Suppr超能文献

胸椎旁神经阻滞联合前锯肌平面阻滞在非气管插管自主呼吸电视辅助胸腔镜手术中的有效性:一项回顾性病例对照研究

Effectiveness of Combining Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Non-Intubated Spontaneous-Ventilation Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Shi Zhengyuan, Shao Gang, Zhang Xiajun, Shi Yuchen, Rong Guoxiang, Xu Dandan, Zhu Huaili, Yin Danqin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Danyang, Affiliated Danyang Hospital of Nantong University, Danyang, Jiangsu Province, 212300, People's Republic of China.

Medical Laboratory, The People's Hospital of Danyang, Affiliated Danyang Hospital of Nantong University, Danyang, Jiangsu Province, 212300, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Inflamm Res. 2025 Aug 14;18:11125-11137. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S526948. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thoracic paravertebral nerve block (TPNB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) are commonly used regional anesthesia techniques for pain management after thoracic surgery. Non-intubated spontaneous-ventilation video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) poses unique challenges in managing postoperative pain and ensuring rapid recovery. We hypothesize that in non-intubated spontaneous VATS, combining TPNB and SAPB may offer enhance pain relief and improve patient prognosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 315 patients undergoing non-intubated VATS between March 2019 and December 2024, divided into three groups: 98 cases in the TPNB (T Group), 113 cases in the SAPB (S Group), and 104 cases in the combination of TPNB and SAPB (TS Group). The propensity score matching method was used to match the initial data in a 1:1:1 ratio, resulting in the T group (70 cases), S group (70 cases), and TS group (70 cases). Postoperative pain control, analgesic consumption and inflammatory markers were assessed in the matched three groups using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

Compared with the T and S groups, the pain control of patients in the TS group was significantly better. At 12 hours, the visual analog scale (VAS) of the T group (5.27 ± 0.57) and the S group (5.09 ± 0.49) were significantly higher than those of the TS group (2.51 ± 0.36) (P<0.05); At 48 hours, both T group (2.87 ± 0.52) and S group (2.63 ± 0.49) were significantly higher than TS group (1.56 ± 0.24) (P<0.05). Compared with the T and S groups, patients in the TS group had a reduced consumption of analgesics. The average consumption of oxycodone in the T group was (49.65 ± 0.71) mg, slightly higher than that in the S group (45.42 ± 0.51) mg and the TS group (30.26 ± 0.53) mg (P<0.05). Compared with the T and S groups, the postoperative recovery quality of patients in the TS group was better. The total score of the QoR-15 scale in the TS group was (120.41 ± 7.75), which was significantly better than that in the T group (113.42 ± 7.65) and S group (112.95 ± 7.56) (P<0.05). Compared with the T and S groups, the inflammatory markers in the TS group were significantly reduced. For IL-1 β, the TS group showed a significant decrease at T1 [(15.33 ± 0.41) pg/mL] and T2 [(13.45 ± 0.71) pg/mL] (P<0.05); For TNF - α, the TS group also showed a significant decrease at T1 [(20.12 ± 1.66) pg/mL] and T2 [(18.42 ± 1.03) pg/mL] (P<0.05). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and dizziness, as well as complications such as atelectasis, hypoxemia, and pulmonary infection, were lower in the TS group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combined use of TPNB and SAPB in non-intubated VATS substantially improves pain management, reduces opioid consumption and minimizes inflammation and postoperative complications compared to the use of individual blocks. These findings advocate for the broader adoption of combined nerve block techniques to enhance patient outcomes in VATS procedures.

摘要

背景

胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPNB)和前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)是胸外科手术后常用的区域麻醉技术,用于疼痛管理。非插管自主通气电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)在术后疼痛管理和确保快速恢复方面带来了独特的挑战。我们假设在非插管自主通气VATS中,联合使用TPNB和SAPB可能会增强疼痛缓解效果并改善患者预后。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了2019年3月至2024年12月期间接受非插管VATS的315例患者,分为三组:TPNB组98例(T组)、SAPB组113例(S组)、TPNB与SAPB联合组104例(TS组)。采用倾向评分匹配法按1:1:1的比例对初始数据进行匹配,得到T组(70例)、S组(70例)和TS组(70例)。使用标准统计方法对匹配后的三组患者的术后疼痛控制、镇痛药物消耗和炎症指标进行评估。

结果

与T组和S组相比,TS组患者的疼痛控制明显更好。术后12小时,T组(5.27±0.57)和S组(5.09±0.49)的视觉模拟评分(VAS)显著高于TS组(2.51±0.36)(P<0.05);术后48小时,T组(2.87±0.52)和S组(2.63±0.49)均显著高于TS组(1.56±0.24)(P<0.05)。与T组和S组相比,TS组患者的镇痛药物消耗量减少。T组羟考酮的平均消耗量为(49.65±0.71)mg,略高于S组(45.42±0.51)mg和TS组(30.26±0.53)mg(P<0.05)。与T组和S组相比,TS组患者术后恢复质量更好。TS组QoR-15量表的总分是(120.41±7.75),显著优于T组(113.42±7.65)和S组(112.95±7.56)(P<0.05)。与T组和S组相比,TS组的炎症指标显著降低。对于白细胞介素-1β,TS组在T1期[(15.33±0.41)pg/mL]和T2期[(13.45±0.71)pg/mL]显著下降(P<0.05);对于肿瘤坏死因子-α,TS组在T1期[(20.12±1.66)pg/mL]和T2期[(18.42±1.03)pg/mL]也显著下降(P<0.05)。此外,TS组恶心、呕吐、头晕等不良反应以及肺不张、低氧血症、肺部感染等并发症的发生率较低(P<0.05)。

结论

在非插管VATS中联合使用TPNB和SAPB与单独使用阻滞相比,可显著改善疼痛管理,减少阿片类药物消耗,并将炎症和术后并发症降至最低。这些发现支持更广泛地采用联合神经阻滞技术以改善VATS手术患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9532/12361353/dd8902a17560/JIR-18-11125-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验