Atif Ibtissam, Elamri Nabila, Gantare Abdellah
Hassan First University of Settat, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Laboratory of Health Sciences and Technologies, Settat, Morocco.
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Feb 26;13:47. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_528_23. eCollection 2024.
This study tried to make a quantitative and qualitative review of the scientific production of the mobilization of critical thinking in nursing and midwifery learning.
The search was carried out in the "Web of Science" and "PubMed" databases between 2001 and 2021, resulting in 43 articles using several keywords "critical thinking," "learning", "nursing," "midwifery". The study will be split into two parts: A quantitative review in the form of a bibliometric analysis and a qualitative one in the form of a literature review. The quality of the articles has been verified by assessing the risk of bias (selection bias, detection bias, and interpretation bias) and using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence method.
The selected articles were the subject of a quantitative study leading to several results: chronology of publications, types of publications, number of publications, top journals of publications, etc. The same articles have been processed to produce a full qualitative review of the experimental studies.
The results showed that the total and annual articles need to be higher. Experimental studies, especially quasi-experimental, are far higher than reviews or descriptive studies. The qualitative research showed a controversial relationship between critical thinking and learning improvement.
本研究试图对护理和助产学习中批判性思维培养的科研成果进行定量和定性综述。
于2001年至2021年间在“科学网”和“PubMed”数据库中进行检索，使用“批判性思维”“学习”“护理”“助产”等多个关键词，共检索到43篇文章。该研究将分为两部分：以文献计量分析形式进行的定量综述和以文献综述形式进行的定性综述。通过评估偏倚风险（选择偏倚、检测偏倚和解释偏倚）并使用卓越质量改进报告标准方法对文章质量进行了验证。
所选文章是一项定量研究的主题，得出了几个结果：出版物年代顺序、出版物类型、出版物数量、顶级出版物期刊等。对同一批文章进行处理，以对实验研究进行全面的定性综述。
结果表明，文章总数和年度文章数量都需要增加。实验研究，尤其是准实验研究，远多于综述或描述性研究。定性研究表明批判性思维与学习改进之间存在有争议的关系。
