• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

角膜交联对经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术后生物力学变化的影响。

Effect of corneal cross-linking on biomechanical changes following transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.

作者信息

Chen Wen, Bao FangJun, Roberts Cynthia J, Zhang Jia, Wang Chong, Li XueFei, Wang JunJie, Abu Said Anas Ziad Masoud, Mayopa Kevin Nguelemo, Chen YaNi, Zheng XiaoBo, Eliasy Ashkan, Elsheikh Ahmed, Chen ShiHao

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

National Engineering Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 15;12:1323612. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1323612. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1323612
PMID:38558790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978754/
Abstract

To evaluate the change in corneal biomechanics in patients with postoperative ectasia risk when combining two common laser vision correction procedures (tPRK and FS-LASIK) with cross-linking (in tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra). The study included 143 eyes of 143 myopic, astigmatic patients that were divided into non-cross-linked refractive surgery groups (non-Xtra groups, tPRK and FS-LASIK) and cross-linked groups (Xtra groups, tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra) according to an ectasia risk scoring system. The eyes were subjected to measurements including the stress-strain index (SSI), the stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), the integrated inverse radius (IIR), the deformation amplitude at apex (DA), and the ratio of deformation amplitude between apex and 2 mm from apex (DARatio2mm). The measurements were taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (pos1m, pos3m, and pos6m). Posterior demarcation line depth from the endothelium (PDLD) and from the ablation surface (DLA) were recorded at pos1m. SP-A1 significantly decreased, while IIR, deformation amplitude, and DARatio2mm increased significantly postoperatively in all four groups ( < 0.01)-all denoting stiffness decreases. In the FS-LASIK group, the changes in IIR, DA, and DARatio2mm were 32.7 ± 15.1%, 12.9 ± 7.1%, and 27.2 ± 12.0% respectively, which were significantly higher ( < 0.05) compared to 20.1 ± 12.8%, 6.4 ± 8.2%, and 19.7 ± 10.4% in the FS-LASIK Xtra group. In the tPRK group, the change in IIR was 27.3 ± 15.5%, significantly larger than 16.9 ± 13.4% in the tPRK Xtra group. The changes of SSI were minimal in the tPRK (-1.5 ± 21.7%, = 1.000), tPRK Xtra (8.4 ± 17.9%, = 0.053), and FS-LASIK Xtra (5.6 ± 12.7%, = 0.634) groups, but was significant in the FS-LASIK group (-12.1 ± 7.9%, < 0.01). After correcting for baseline biomechanical metrics, preoperative bIOP and the change in central corneal thickness (△CCT) from pre to pos6m, the changes in the IIR in both FS-LASIK and tPRK groups, as well as DA, DARatio2mm and SSI in the FS-LASIK group remained statistically greater than their corresponding Xtra groups (all < 0.05). Most importantly, after correcting for these covariates, the changes in DARatio2mm in the FS-LASIK Xtra became statistically smaller than in the tPRK Xtra ( = 0.017). The statistical analysis results indicate that tPRK Xtra and FS-LASIK Xtra effectively reduced the biomechanical losses caused by refractive surgery (tPRK and FS-LASIK). The decrease in corneal overall stiffness was greater in FS-LASIK than in tPRK, and the biomechanical enhancement of CXL was also higher following LASIK than after tPRK.

摘要

为评估在有术后扩张风险的患者中,将两种常见的激光视力矫正手术(经上皮准分子原位角膜磨镶术[tPRK]和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术[FS-LASIK])与交联术(tPRK Xtra和FS-LASIK Xtra中的交联术)联合应用时角膜生物力学的变化。该研究纳入了143例近视、散光患者的143只眼,根据扩张风险评分系统将其分为非交联屈光手术组(非Xtra组,tPRK和FS-LASIK)和交联组(Xtra组,tPRK Xtra和FS-LASIK Xtra)。对这些眼睛进行了多项测量,包括应力应变指数(SSI)、首次压平处的刚度参数(SP-A1)、综合逆半径(IIR)、顶点处的变形幅度(DA)以及顶点与距顶点2mm处的变形幅度之比(DARatio2mm)。测量在术前以及术后1个月、3个月和6个月(术后1个月[pos1m]、术后3个月[pos3m]和术后6个月[pos6m])进行。在术后1个月记录从内皮到后分界线的深度(PDLD)以及从消融表面到后分界线的深度(DLA)。在所有四组中,术后SP-A1显著降低,而IIR、变形幅度和DARatio2mm显著增加(<0.01),所有这些都表明刚度降低。在FS-LASIK组中,IIR、DA和DARatio2mm的变化分别为32.7±15.1%、12.9±7.1%和27.2±12.0%,与FS-LASIK Xtra组的20.1±12.8%、6.4±8.2%和19.7±10.4%相比显著更高(<0.05)。在tPRK组中,IIR的变化为27.3±15.5%,显著大于tPRK Xtra组的16.9±13.4%。在tPRK组(-1.5±21.7%,P = 1.000)、tPRK Xtra组(8.4±17.9%,P = 0.053)和FS-LASIK Xtra组(5.6±12.7%,P = 0.634)中,SSI的变化最小,但在FS-LASIK组中显著(-12.1±7.9%,P<0.01)。在校正基线生物力学指标、术前眼压(bIOP)以及术前至术后6个月中央角膜厚度的变化(△CCT)后,FS-LASIK组和tPRK组中IIR的变化,以及FS-LASIK组中DA、DARatio2mm和SSI的变化在统计学上仍大于其相应的Xtra组(均P<0.05)。最重要的是,在校正这些协变量后,FS-LASIK Xtra组中DARatio2mm的变化在统计学上变得小于tPRK Xtra组(P = 0.017)。统计分析结果表明,tPRK Xtra和FS-LASIK Xtra有效减少了屈光手术(tPRK和FS-LASIK)导致的生物力学损失。FS-LASIK中角膜整体刚度的降低大于tPRK,并且交联术(CXL)在LASIK术后的生物力学增强也高于tPRK术后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/a0fe12c007d2/fbioe-12-1323612-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/ff1306c0243a/fbioe-12-1323612-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/7e4ff6079b5d/fbioe-12-1323612-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/88e1ef8a949a/fbioe-12-1323612-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/4c97fa6986a3/fbioe-12-1323612-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/7ada376d1b86/fbioe-12-1323612-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/828dc77a1615/fbioe-12-1323612-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/a0fe12c007d2/fbioe-12-1323612-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/ff1306c0243a/fbioe-12-1323612-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/7e4ff6079b5d/fbioe-12-1323612-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/88e1ef8a949a/fbioe-12-1323612-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/4c97fa6986a3/fbioe-12-1323612-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/7ada376d1b86/fbioe-12-1323612-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/828dc77a1615/fbioe-12-1323612-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3c2/10978754/a0fe12c007d2/fbioe-12-1323612-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of corneal cross-linking on biomechanical changes following transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK.角膜交联对经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术后生物力学变化的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 15;12:1323612. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1323612. eCollection 2024.
2
Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea.全准分子激光角膜表面切削术、飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术和全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术对角膜的生物力学影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 31;10:834270. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.834270. eCollection 2022.
3
Effect of fluence levels on prophylactic corneal cross-linking for laser in situ keratomileusis and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.光密度对 LASIK 和经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术预防性角膜交联的影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar;101(2):e185-e196. doi: 10.1111/aos.15230. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Response to Three Different Laser Corneal Refractive Surgeries.三种不同激光角膜屈光手术对活体角膜生物力学的影响。
J Refract Surg. 2024 May;40(5):e344-e352. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240322-01. Epub 2024 May 1.
5
Corneal Epithelial Remodeling in a 6-Month Follow-up Period in Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgeries.近视眼角膜屈光手术后 6 个月的角膜上皮重塑。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Mar;39(3):187-196. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230113-02. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
Changes in Intraocular Pressure after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis.经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术和飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后眼压的变化
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 10;2021:5592195. doi: 10.1155/2021/5592195. eCollection 2021.
7
Regional Changes in Posterior Corneal Surface During a 6-Month Follow-up Period After tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE.经 tPRK、FS-LASIK 和 SMILE 治疗后 6 个月的后角膜表面的区域变化。
J Refract Surg. 2022 Nov;38(11):708-715. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20221005-02. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Effectiveness of 4 tonometers in measuring IOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE, and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.4种眼压计在飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术、全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术和经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术后测量眼压的有效性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jul;46(7):967-974. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000204.
9
Corneal curvature, asphericity, and aberrations after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted keratomileusis for myopia: A prospective comparative study.经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与飞秒激光辅助角膜磨镶术治疗近视的角膜曲率、非球性和像差:一项前瞻性对比研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2945-2949. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1106_20.
10
Postoperative corneal biomechanics and influencing factors during femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for high myopia.飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)和激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗高度近视术后角膜生物力学及其影响因素。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Oct;36(8):1709-1717. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03320-2. Epub 2021 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Combined with Prophylactic Corneal Cross-Linking for Correction of Myopia: Regional Analysis of Corneal Morphology.准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)联合预防性角膜交联术矫正近视:角膜形态的区域分析
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1423-1439. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00510-1. Epub 2022 May 9.
2
Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties in PRK Followed by Two Accelerated CXL Energy Doses in Rabbit Eyes.PRK 术后角膜生物力学特性的变化及两种加速交联能量剂量在兔眼的应用。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Dec;37(12):853-860. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210830-03. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Incidence of Ectasia After SMILE From a High-Volume Refractive Surgery Center in India.
印度一家高容量屈光手术中心的 SMILE 后扩张症发生率。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Dec;37(12):800-808. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210812-03. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Comparison of safety and efficiency of corneal topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and combined with crosslinking in myopic correction: An 18-month follow-up.角膜地形引导光折射性角膜切削术与联合交联治疗近视的安全性和疗效比较:18 个月随访。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 15;100(2):e23769. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023769.
5
Individualized Corneal Cross-linking With Riboflavin and UV-A in Ultrathin Corneas: The Sub400 Protocol.超薄角膜中核黄素与紫外线A的个体化角膜交联:Sub400方案
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;224:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
6
Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea.角膜的生物力学诊断
Eye Vis (Lond). 2020 Feb 5;7:9. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-0174-x. eCollection 2020.
7
Similar Biomechanical Cross-linking Effect After SMILE and PRK in Human Corneas in an Ex Vivo Model for Postoperative Ectasia.SMILE 和 PRK 术后角膜扩张的离体模型中,人眼角膜的相似生物力学交联效应。
J Refract Surg. 2020 Jan 1;36(1):49-54. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20191211-01.
8
Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术与飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术、准分子原位角膜磨镶术、准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术或准分子激光角膜表面切削术术后角膜生物力学特性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1165-3.
9
Determination of Corneal Biomechanical Behavior for Healthy Eyes Using CorVis ST Tonometry: Stress-Strain Index.使用CorVis ST眼压计测定健康眼睛的角膜生物力学行为:应力应变指数
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 May 16;7:105. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00105. eCollection 2019.
10
Evaluation of corneal elastic modulus based on Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology.基于角膜可视化 Scheimpflug 技术的角膜弹性模量评估。
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Apr 4;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0662-1.