• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的实践标准对内布拉斯加州和科罗拉多州实施家庭第一预防服务法案的影响。

Evidence-based practice criteria's effect on the implementation of the Family First Prevention Services Act in Nebraska and Colorado.

机构信息

College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2024 Jun;104:102428. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102428. Epub 2024 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102428
PMID:38564974
Abstract

Child abuse, particularly neglect, is often preventable because many causes of harm stem from poverty, lack of social connections, substance use disorders, mental illness, lack of childcare, and other family support shortages. Prevention of child abuse and neglect starts with family support in these areas. The federal government recognized this need for prevention, and through considerable bipartisan support, passed the Family First Prevention Services Act on February 9, 2018. The Family First Prevention Services Act was designed to divert investment away from long-term foster care and toward programs that prevent unnecessary placement and child protective services interventions. The Family First Prevention Services Act restricts the state's use of federal funds for institutional foster care placements and uses those savings to fund reimbursements for evidence-based family preservation. The requirement for evidence-based prevention is a first in child-welfare federal law, and compliance with this requirement requires public-private partnership with agencies implementing the models, infrastructure, and evaluation standards that most states must build to be eligible for the new funding. This evaluation research analyzed how the stringent guidelines for prevention funding and the requirement of federally approved evidence-based practice programming affect the implementation of the Family First Prevention Services Act in Nebraska and Colorado.

摘要

儿童虐待,尤其是忽视,往往是可以预防的,因为许多伤害的原因都源于贫困、缺乏社会联系、药物使用障碍、精神疾病、缺乏儿童保育以及其他家庭支持的短缺。预防儿童虐待和忽视首先要从家庭支持这些方面入手。联邦政府认识到这一预防需求,通过两党相当大的支持,于 2018 年 2 月 9 日通过了《家庭第一预防服务法案》。《家庭第一预防服务法案》旨在将投资从长期寄养转向预防不必要安置和儿童保护服务干预的项目。《家庭第一预防服务法案》限制了州政府对机构寄养安置的联邦资金使用,并利用这些储蓄为基于证据的家庭保护提供报销资金。基于证据的预防要求是儿童福利联邦法律中的首创,而遵守这一要求需要与实施这些模式、基础设施和评估标准的机构建立公私合作伙伴关系,大多数州必须建立这些以符合新的资金要求。这项评估研究分析了预防资金的严格指导方针以及联邦批准的基于证据的实践方案的要求如何影响《家庭第一预防服务法案》在内布拉斯加州和科罗拉多州的实施。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based practice criteria's effect on the implementation of the Family First Prevention Services Act in Nebraska and Colorado.基于证据的实践标准对内布拉斯加州和科罗拉多州实施家庭第一预防服务法案的影响。
Eval Program Plann. 2024 Jun;104:102428. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102428. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
2
Predictors of family preservation outcomes and child welfare success in Colorado.科罗拉多州家庭保护结果及儿童福利成功的预测因素。
Child Welfare. 2012;91(4):41-59.
3
Reorienting intensive family preservation services in relation to public child welfare practice.
Child Welfare. 1996 Nov-Dec;75(6):667-92.
4
Scaling Up Housing Services Within the Child Welfare System: Policy Insights From Simulation Modeling.扩大儿童福利系统中的住房服务规模:模拟建模的政策见解。
Child Maltreat. 2020 Feb;25(1):51-60. doi: 10.1177/1077559519846431. Epub 2019 May 16.
5
Government leadership to protect children from foster care "drift".政府领导以保护儿童免受寄养“流失”之害。
Child Abuse Negl. 1984;8(3):337-42. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(84)90074-7.
6
The impact of a statewide trauma-informed child welfare initiative on children's permanency and maltreatment outcomes.全州范围创伤知情型儿童福利倡议对儿童安置和虐待问题结果的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Jul;81:149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 May 5.
7
The context of child welfare performance measures.儿童福利绩效衡量的背景。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2013;10(3):147-60. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.788946.
8
Child, Family, and Case Characteristics Associated With Reentry Into Out-of-Home Care Among Children and Youth Involved With Child Protection Services.与儿童保护服务相关的儿童和青少年重新进入家庭外照顾的儿童、家庭和案例特征。
Child Maltreat. 2020 May;25(2):162-171. doi: 10.1177/1077559519869395. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
9
Are Home Evictions Associated with Child Welfare System Involvement? Empirical Evidence from National Eviction Records and Child Protective Services Data.房屋驱逐与儿童福利系统介入有关联吗?来自全国驱逐记录和儿童保护服务数据的实证证据。
Child Maltreat. 2024 Feb;29(1):66-81. doi: 10.1177/10775595221125917. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
10
State Implementation of Congregate Care Reforms for Children in Foster Care.集中护理改革在寄养儿童中的实施状况。
Pediatrics. 2024 Jul 1;154(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-063680.