• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化美国残疾人群体的积极出行。

Quantifying active travel among people with disabilities in the US.

机构信息

Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois- Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1640 Roosevelt Road, Chicago, 60608, United States.

Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois- Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1640 Roosevelt Road, Chicago, 60608, United States; College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, 412 S. Peoria St., Chicago, 60607, United States.

出版信息

Disabil Health J. 2024 Jul;17(3):101615. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101615. Epub 2024 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101615
PMID:38565481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11194152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with disabilities have higher rates of physical inactivity than people without. Active travel (e.g., walking/wheeling to nearby destinations or transit) is a recommended approach to increasing total physical activity (PA) but limited research has examined active travel among people with disabilities.

OBJECTIVE

To describe active travel among a nationally representative sample of people with disabilities, analyze variation between sub-groups, and examine factors associated with active travel.

METHODS

Using the 2017 National Household Travel Survey, our cross-sectional analysis summarized counts and duration of walking/wheeling trips for people with four different types of disabilities. We examined which factors were associated with doing any active travel and the duration of active travel, using zero inflated negative binomial regression models.

RESULTS

Our analysis identified that 14.55% of people with disabilities took a mean of 2.56 (95%CI = 2.42-2.69) walking/wheeling trips per day. Compared to non-active travelers, a higher proportion of active travelers were low-income, lived alone, had no-vehicle, and were Black or Hispanic. For active travelers, daily walking minutes, on average, were 46.41 (95%CI = 40.25-52.57) among people who used ambulatory devices, 41.55 (95%CI = 24.61-58.49) among people who were blind/low-vision, 39.93 (95%CI = 35.41-44.45) among people who used no device, and 29.58 (95%CI = 23.53-35.64) among people who used chair devices. Our analysis identified individual, household, and community factors associated with the likelihood and duration of walking/wheeling for travel and variation across disability types.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the multiple identities of active travelers with disabilities can inform walking/wheeling intervention strategies. Infrastructure improvements that support less reliance on automobiles could increase active travel among people with disabilities.

摘要

背景

残疾人士的身体活动水平高于非残疾人士。积极出行(例如,步行/轮椅前往附近目的地或公共交通)是增加总体身体活动(PA)的推荐方法,但针对残疾人士的积极出行的研究有限。

目的

描述具有代表性的残疾人士样本中的积极出行情况,分析亚组之间的差异,并探讨与积极出行相关的因素。

方法

我们使用 2017 年全国家庭出行调查,对四种不同类型残疾人士的步行/轮椅出行次数和时长进行了横断面分析。我们使用零膨胀负二项回归模型,检验了哪些因素与任何积极出行以及积极出行的时长相关。

结果

我们的分析发现,14.55%的残疾人士每天平均进行 2.56 次(95%CI=2.42-2.69)步行/轮椅出行。与非积极出行者相比,更多的积极出行者收入较低、独居、无交通工具且为非裔或西班牙裔。对于积极出行者,使用助行器的人群每天步行分钟数平均为 46.41(95%CI=40.25-52.57),盲人/低视力人群为 41.55(95%CI=24.61-58.49),无使用任何装置的人群为 39.93(95%CI=35.41-44.45),使用轮椅的人群为 29.58(95%CI=23.53-35.64)。我们的分析确定了与步行/轮椅出行的可能性和时长以及残疾类型差异相关的个体、家庭和社区因素。

结论

了解残疾积极出行者的多重身份可以为步行/轮椅出行干预策略提供信息。支持减少对汽车依赖的基础设施改善可以增加残疾人士的积极出行。

相似文献

1
Quantifying active travel among people with disabilities in the US.量化美国残疾人群体的积极出行。
Disabil Health J. 2024 Jul;17(3):101615. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101615. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
7
Exercise interventions for cerebral palsy.脑瘫的运动干预
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD011660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011660.pub2.
8
Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.预防 5 至 11 岁儿童肥胖的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 20;5(5):CD015328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015328.pub2.
9
Reading aids for adults with low vision.针对视力低下成年人的阅读辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD003303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub4.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Physical Activity and Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.体力活动与抑郁风险的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 1;79(6):550-559. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609.
2
Lifestyle physical activity in manual wheelchair users - an overlooked public health opportunity.手动轮椅使用者的生活方式体力活动——一个被忽视的公共卫生机遇。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Feb;60(2):190-192. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00729-y. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
A double jeopardy: COVID-19 impacts on the travel behavior and community living of people with disabilities.双重困境:新冠疫情对残疾人出行行为和社区生活的影响
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2022 Feb;156:24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour over adulthood in relation to all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review of analytic strategies and study findings.成年期的身体活动和久坐行为与全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率的关系:分析策略和研究结果的系统综述
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 May 9;51(2):641-667. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab181.
5
Moving Toward Physical Activity Targets by Walking to Transit: National Household Transportation Survey, 2001-2017.迈向通过步行到达公交站点的身体活动目标:2001-2017 年全国家庭交通调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Sep;59(3):e115-e123. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 May 16.
6
The association between physical activity with incident obesity, coronary heart disease, diabetes and hypertension in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies published after 2012.体力活动与成年人肥胖、冠心病、糖尿病和高血压发病风险的关系:2012 年后发表的纵向研究系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 19;20(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08715-4.
7
Differences in perceived neighborhood environmental supports and barriers for walking between US adults with and without a disability.美国残疾与非残疾成年人对步行环境支持和障碍感知的差异。
Prev Med. 2020 May;134:106065. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106065. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
8
Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults - United States, 2016.残疾状况和类型对美国成年人残疾和医疗保健获取的影响:2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 17;67(32):882-887. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6732a3.
9
Does the built environment moderate the relationship between having a disability and lower levels of physical activity? A systematic review.建筑环境是否会缓和残疾与身体活动水平较低之间的关系?一项系统综述。
Prev Med. 2017 Feb;95S:S75-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
Importance of proximity to resources, social support, transportation and neighborhood security for mobility and social participation in older adults: results from a scoping study.资源 proximity、社会支持、交通和社区安全对老年人行动能力和社会参与的重要性:一项范围界定研究的结果
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 23;15:503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1824-0.