• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用钬:YAG 激光(Cyber Ho)的用于 10 至 20 毫米肾结石的 RIRS 和 MiniPerc 术前规划的数学模型建议:根据大小硬度(SMASH)评分的结石管理。

A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:Yag laser (Cyber Ho): the stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana, Como, Italy.

Department of Urology, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, 22042, San Fermo della Battaglia, Italy.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9
PMID:38565776
Abstract

To evaluate the performance of a mathematical model to drive preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc (MP) for the treatment of renal stones between 10 and 20 mm. Patients with a renal stone between 10 and 20 mm were enrolled. A mathematical model named Stone Management According to Size-Hardness (SMASH) score was calculated: hounsfield units (HU) χ stone maximum size (cm)/100. Patients were divided into 4 groups: RIRS with score < 15 (Group A), RIRS with score ≥ 15 (Group B), MP with score < 15 (Group C), MP with score ≥ 15 (Group D). Cyber Ho device was always used. Stone free rate (SFR) was assessed after 3 months. Complication rate and need for auxiliary procedures were evaluated. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 350 patients were enrolled (87, 88, 82 and 93 in Groups A, B, C and D). Mean stone size was 13.1 vs 13.3 mm in Group A vs B (p = 0.18) and 16.2 vs 18.1 mm in Group C vs D (p = 0.12). SFR was 82%, 61%, 75% and 85% for Groups A, B, C and D. SFR was comparable between Groups C and D (p = 0.32) and Groups A and C (p = 0.22). SFR was significantly higher in Group A over B (p = 0.03) and in Group D over B (p = 0.02). Complication rate was 2.2%, 3.4%, 12.1%, 12.9% for Groups A, B, C, D. RIRS and MP are both safe and effective. The mathematical model with the proposed cut-off allowed a proper allocation of patients between endoscopic and percutaneous approaches.Registration number of the study ISRCTN55546280.

摘要

评估一种数学模型在经尿道输尿管镜碎石术(RIRS)和经皮肾镜取石术(MP)治疗 10-20mm 肾结石中的术前规划效果。纳入 10-20mm 肾结石患者。计算一种名为结石大小硬度管理评分(SMASH 评分)的数学模型:体素值(HU)×结石最大直径(cm)/100。患者分为 4 组:RIRS 组 SMASH 评分<15(A 组)、RIRS 组 SMASH 评分≥15(B 组)、MP 组 SMASH 评分<15(C 组)、MP 组 SMASH 评分≥15(D 组)。始终使用 Cyber Ho 设备。术后 3 个月评估无结石率(SFR)。评估并发症发生率和辅助手术需求。2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月,共纳入 350 例患者(A、B、C、D 组分别为 87、88、82、93 例)。A 组与 B 组结石平均大小分别为 13.1mm 和 13.3mm(p=0.18),C 组与 D 组分别为 16.2mm 和 18.1mm(p=0.12)。A、B、C、D 组 SFR 分别为 82%、61%、75%、85%。C 组与 D 组 SFR 无差异(p=0.32),A 组与 C 组 SFR 无差异(p=0.22)。A 组 SFR 明显高于 B 组(p=0.03),D 组 SFR 明显高于 B 组(p=0.02)。A、B、C、D 组并发症发生率分别为 2.2%、3.4%、12.1%、12.9%。RIRS 和 MP 均安全有效。所提出的截断值的数学模型可实现内镜和经皮方法之间患者的合理分配。研究注册号 ISRCTN55546280。

相似文献

1
A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:Yag laser (Cyber Ho): the stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score.一种使用钬:YAG 激光(Cyber Ho)的用于 10 至 20 毫米肾结石的 RIRS 和 MiniPerc 术前规划的数学模型建议:根据大小硬度(SMASH)评分的结石管理。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9.
2
A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial.钬激光光纤碎石术(Fiber Dust)与微创经皮肾镜取石术(min iPerc)治疗 10~20mm 肾结石的随机对照研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2555-2560. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04133-w. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
3
Risk of bleeding after retrograde intrarenal surgery vs miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 10-20 mm renal stones: a not so different safety profile.逆行性肾内手术与小型化经皮肾镜取石术治疗10 - 20毫米肾结石后的出血风险:安全概况并无太大差异。
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):497-501. doi: 10.1111/bju.16585. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
4
Endoscopic treatment of renal and ureteral stones using the new Cyber Ho generator with Magneto technology: the first clinical experience from a multicenter study.使用具有磁技术的新型赛博 Ho 发生器进行肾和输尿管结石的内镜治疗:多中心研究的首例临床经验。
World J Urol. 2025 Apr 15;43(1):224. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05603-7.
5
Do Hounsfield Units have any significance in predicting intra- and postoperative outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery using Holmium and Thulium fiber laser? Results from the FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR).钬激光和铥光纤激光逆行肾内手术中亨氏单位对预测围手术期结局是否有意义?来自 Flex 输尿管镜手术结果登记处(FLEXOR)的研究结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):2881-2888. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04362-7. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
6
Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.钬激光与铥光纤激光治疗输尿管镜碎石术的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验的结果。
Eur Urol. 2022 Jul;82(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
7
Initial clinical experience with the pulsed solid-state thulium YAG laser from Dornier during RIRS: first 25 cases.在 RIRS 中使用 Dornier 公司的脉冲固态钬 YAG 激光的初步临床经验:前 25 例。
World J Urol. 2023 Aug;41(8):2119-2125. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04501-0. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
8
[Mini-PCNL, micro-PCNL or RIRS: comparative efficacy and safety in renal stones up to 2 cm].[微创经皮肾镜取石术、微通道经皮肾镜取石术或逆行肾盂内切开术:2厘米以下肾结石的疗效与安全性比较]
Urologiia. 2023 Sep(4):98-104.
9
Assessment of Factors Responsible for Stone-Free Status After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.逆行性肾内手术结石清除状态相关因素的评估
Cureus. 2024 Jul 1;16(7):e63627. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63627. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Outcome of Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones in Infants and Preschool Children: A Prospective Study.婴幼儿及学龄前儿童肾结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术结果:一项前瞻性研究
Urology. 2015 Nov;86(5):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-access mini-PCNL with flexible cystoscopy vs. multi-access mini-PCNL for complex renal stones in prospective study.前瞻性研究中,单通道微创经皮肾镜取石术联合软性膀胱镜与多通道微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂性肾结石的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15887-9.
2
A comparison on safety and efficacy between 24 Fr versus 18 Fr pneumatic balloon dilators for percutaneous treatment of renal stones between 10 and 20 mm: results from a contemporary cohort.24 Fr与18 Fr气动球囊扩张器经皮治疗10至20毫米肾结石的安全性和疗效比较:当代队列研究结果
World J Urol. 2025 Jan 20;43(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05445-3.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial.钬激光光纤碎石术(Fiber Dust)与微创经皮肾镜取石术(min iPerc)治疗 10~20mm 肾结石的随机对照研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2555-2560. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04133-w. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Optimization of shockwave lithotripsy use for single medium sized hard renal stone with stone density ≥ 1000 HU. A prospective study.优化冲击波碎石术治疗单个中等大小、结石密度≥1000 HU 的肾结石:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):243-250. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03807-1. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
3
Factors associated with the stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery in children.
儿童逆行性肾盂内手术后结石清除状态的相关因素。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14667. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14667. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
Application of S.T.O.N.E. Nephrolithometry Score for Prediction of Stone-Free Status and Complication Rates in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Nephrolitotomy for Renal Stone.应用 S.T.O.N.E. 肾结石评分预测行经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石患者的无石状态和并发症发生率。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Apr;32(4):372-377. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0197. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Role of Preoperative Renal Stone Complexity Assessment by Guy's Stone Score as a Predictor of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes.Guy's 结石评分评估术前肾结石复杂性作为经皮肾镜取石术结果的预测因子的作用。
Urol Int. 2021;105(7-8):548-553. doi: 10.1159/000505979. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
6
Novel prediction scoring system for simple assessment of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy: T.O.HO. score.新型预测评分系统,用于灵活输尿管镜碎石术后简单评估结石清除状态:T.O.HO. 评分。
Int J Urol. 2020 Sep;27(9):742-747. doi: 10.1111/iju.14289. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
7
Comparison of STONE score, Guy's stone score and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) score as predictive tools for percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcome: a prospective study.比较 STONE 评分、Guy 结石评分和临床研究办公室的腔内泌尿外科学会 (CROES) 评分作为经皮肾镜取石术结果的预测工具:一项前瞻性研究。
BJU Int. 2020 Oct;126(4):494-501. doi: 10.1111/bju.15130. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis.逆行肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗>2 cm 肾结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Aug;72(4):441-450. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03721-2. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
9
Evaluation of Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.评估肾结石评分系统以预测逆行性肾内手术的结果。
Urol J. 2020 Jun 23;17(4):352-357. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5256.
10
The R.I.R.S. scoring system: An innovative scoring system for predicting stone-free rate following retrograde intrarenal surgery.R.I.R.S.评分系统:一种用于预测逆行性肾内手术后结石清除率的创新评分系统。
BMC Urol. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0297-0.