Department of Urology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana, Como, Italy.
Department of Urology, Sant'Anna Hospital, Via Ravona 20, 22042, San Fermo della Battaglia, Italy.
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9.
To evaluate the performance of a mathematical model to drive preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc (MP) for the treatment of renal stones between 10 and 20 mm. Patients with a renal stone between 10 and 20 mm were enrolled. A mathematical model named Stone Management According to Size-Hardness (SMASH) score was calculated: hounsfield units (HU) χ stone maximum size (cm)/100. Patients were divided into 4 groups: RIRS with score < 15 (Group A), RIRS with score ≥ 15 (Group B), MP with score < 15 (Group C), MP with score ≥ 15 (Group D). Cyber Ho device was always used. Stone free rate (SFR) was assessed after 3 months. Complication rate and need for auxiliary procedures were evaluated. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 350 patients were enrolled (87, 88, 82 and 93 in Groups A, B, C and D). Mean stone size was 13.1 vs 13.3 mm in Group A vs B (p = 0.18) and 16.2 vs 18.1 mm in Group C vs D (p = 0.12). SFR was 82%, 61%, 75% and 85% for Groups A, B, C and D. SFR was comparable between Groups C and D (p = 0.32) and Groups A and C (p = 0.22). SFR was significantly higher in Group A over B (p = 0.03) and in Group D over B (p = 0.02). Complication rate was 2.2%, 3.4%, 12.1%, 12.9% for Groups A, B, C, D. RIRS and MP are both safe and effective. The mathematical model with the proposed cut-off allowed a proper allocation of patients between endoscopic and percutaneous approaches.Registration number of the study ISRCTN55546280.
评估一种数学模型在经尿道输尿管镜碎石术(RIRS)和经皮肾镜取石术(MP)治疗 10-20mm 肾结石中的术前规划效果。纳入 10-20mm 肾结石患者。计算一种名为结石大小硬度管理评分(SMASH 评分)的数学模型:体素值(HU)×结石最大直径(cm)/100。患者分为 4 组:RIRS 组 SMASH 评分<15(A 组)、RIRS 组 SMASH 评分≥15(B 组)、MP 组 SMASH 评分<15(C 组)、MP 组 SMASH 评分≥15(D 组)。始终使用 Cyber Ho 设备。术后 3 个月评估无结石率(SFR)。评估并发症发生率和辅助手术需求。2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月,共纳入 350 例患者(A、B、C、D 组分别为 87、88、82、93 例)。A 组与 B 组结石平均大小分别为 13.1mm 和 13.3mm(p=0.18),C 组与 D 组分别为 16.2mm 和 18.1mm(p=0.12)。A、B、C、D 组 SFR 分别为 82%、61%、75%、85%。C 组与 D 组 SFR 无差异(p=0.32),A 组与 C 组 SFR 无差异(p=0.22)。A 组 SFR 明显高于 B 组(p=0.03),D 组 SFR 明显高于 B 组(p=0.02)。A、B、C、D 组并发症发生率分别为 2.2%、3.4%、12.1%、12.9%。RIRS 和 MP 均安全有效。所提出的截断值的数学模型可实现内镜和经皮方法之间患者的合理分配。研究注册号 ISRCTN55546280。