Suppr超能文献

比较 STONE 评分、Guy 结石评分和临床研究办公室的腔内泌尿外科学会 (CROES) 评分作为经皮肾镜取石术结果的预测工具:一项前瞻性研究。

Comparison of STONE score, Guy's stone score and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) score as predictive tools for percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcome: a prospective study.

机构信息

Urology Department, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2020 Oct;126(4):494-501. doi: 10.1111/bju.15130. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate which among the three scoring systems used to predict stone-free status (SFS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), namely Guy's stone score (GSS), STONE nephrolithometry score and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nephrolithometry nomogram, is the most accurate predictor of SFS.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

We prospectively included all patients who underwent PCNL (tract size >24 F) at our hospital between July 2017 and January 2019. All demographic and peri-operative data were tabulated including calculation of GSS, STONE score and CROES nomogram score using preoperative computed tomography. Comparison of the 'stone-free' group and 'residual-stone' group was carried out using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients were enrolled. The mean GSS, STONE score and CROES score in the stone-free group was 1.60, 6.98 and 212.27, respectively, and in the residual stone group group it was 2.93, 8.98 and 129.89, respectively (P < 0.001 in each). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that all three scoring systems had similar predictive accuracy for post-PCNL SFS, with STONE score having the highest area under the ROC curve value (0.852). GSS was significantly associated with operating time, estimated blood loss (EBL) and length of hospital stay (LOS; P < 0.001 in each). STONE score and CROES score were both significantly associated with EBL (P = 0.029 and 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

All three scoring systems are equally predictive of post-PCNL SFS. EBL is significantly associated with all three scoring systems, while GSS is also associated with operating time and LOS.

摘要

目的

评估三种用于预测经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后结石无残留状态(SFS)的评分系统(Guy 结石评分(GSS)、STONE 肾结石测量评分和临床研究办公室的腔内泌尿外科学会(CROES)肾结石测量列线图)中,哪一种是预测 SFS 的最准确方法。

方法与材料

我们前瞻性地纳入了 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 1 月期间在我院接受 PCNL(通道大小>24F)的所有患者。所有人口统计学和围手术期数据均被制表,包括使用术前计算机断层扫描计算 GSS、STONE 评分和 CROES 列线图评分。使用标准统计学方法比较“结石无残留”组和“结石残留”组。

结果

共纳入 252 例患者。结石无残留组的平均 GSS、STONE 评分和 CROES 评分分别为 1.60、6.98 和 212.27,结石残留组分别为 2.93、8.98 和 129.89,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线显示,三种评分系统对 PCNL 后 SFS 的预测准确性相似,其中 STONE 评分的 ROC 曲线下面积最高(0.852)。GSS 与手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)和住院时间(LOS)显著相关(P<0.001)。STONE 评分和 CROES 评分均与 EBL 显著相关(P=0.029 和 0.001)。

结论

三种评分系统对 PCNL 后 SFS 的预测能力相当。EBL 与三种评分系统均显著相关,而 GSS 还与手术时间和 LOS 相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验