• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚太骨科协会会员对脆性骨折管理的认知和态度调查。

Survey of awareness and attitudes to the management of fragility fractures among the membership of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association.

机构信息

Beacon Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.

School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Apr 2;19(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01375-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11657-024-01375-6
PMID:38565791
Abstract

UNLABELLED

A survey of awareness and attitudes to the management of fragility fractures among the membership of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association conducted in 2022 found considerable variation in care across the region. A Call to Action is proposed to improve acute care, rehabilitation and secondary fracture prevention across Asia Pacific.

PURPOSE

Fragility fractures impose a substantial burden on older people and their families, healthcare systems and national economies. The current incidence of hip and other fragility fractures across the Asia Pacific region is enormous and set to escalate rapidly in the coming decades. This publication describes findings of a survey of awareness and attitudes to the management of fragility fractures among the membership of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association (APOA) conducted in 2022.

METHODS

The survey was developed as a collaboration between the Asia Pacific Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture Society and the Asia Pacific Fragility Fracture Alliance, and included questions relating to aspects of care upon presentation, during surgery and mobilisation, secondary fracture prevention, and access to specific services.

RESULTS

In total, 521 APOA members completed the survey and marked variation in delivery of care was evident. Notable findings included: Fifty-nine percent of respondents indicated that analgesia was routinely initiated in transit (by paramedics) or within 30 minutes of arrival in the Emergency Department. One-quarter of respondents stated that more than 80% of their patients underwent surgery within 48 hours of admission. One-third of respondents considered non-hip, non-vertebral fractures to merit assessment of future fracture risk. One-third of respondents reported the presence of an Orthogeriatric Service in their hospital, and less than a quarter reported the presence of a Fracture Liaison Service.

CONCLUSION

A Call to Action for all National Orthopaedic Associations affiliated with APOA is proposed to improve the care of fragility fracture patients across the region.

摘要

目的

脆性骨折给老年人及其家庭、医疗保健系统和国家经济带来了巨大负担。目前,整个亚太地区髋部和其他脆性骨折的发病率非常高,并将在未来几十年迅速上升。本出版物描述了对 2022 年亚太骨科协会(APOA)会员对脆性骨折管理的认识和态度进行的一项调查的结果。

方法

该调查是由亚太骨质疏松症和脆性骨折学会以及亚太脆性骨折联盟合作开发的,包括与就诊时、手术期间和活动期间护理的各个方面、二级骨折预防以及特定服务的获取相关的问题。

结果

共有 521 名 APOA 成员完成了调查,明显存在护理提供方面的差异。值得注意的发现包括:59%的受访者表示,在转运(由护理人员)或到达急诊科后 30 分钟内常规开始使用止痛药。四分之一的受访者表示,超过 80%的患者在入院后 48 小时内接受了手术。三分之一的受访者认为非髋部、非椎体骨折值得评估未来的骨折风险。三分之一的受访者报告其所在医院有矫形骨科服务,不到四分之一的受访者报告有骨折联络服务。

结论

建议所有与 APOA 相关的国家骨科协会采取行动,以改善该地区脆性骨折患者的护理。

相似文献

1
Survey of awareness and attitudes to the management of fragility fractures among the membership of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association.亚太骨科协会会员对脆性骨折管理的认知和态度调查。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Apr 2;19(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01375-6.
2
Quality improvement initiatives in the care and prevention of fragility fractures in the Asia Pacific region.亚太地区脆性骨折护理和预防的质量改进措施。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Aug 20;17(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01153-2.
3
Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative.亚太地区脆性骨折的二级预防:一项教育举措。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 May;31(5):805-826. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05197-y. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
4
Fracture liaison services for osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region: current unmet needs and systematic literature review.亚太地区骨质疏松性骨折联络服务:当前未满足的需求和系统文献回顾。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):779-792. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4347-y. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Experience of a systematic approach to care and prevention of fragility fractures in New Zealand.新西兰系统护理和预防脆性骨折的经验。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Aug 2;17(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01138-1.
6
Quality Improvement Initiatives in Fragility Fracture Care and Prevention.脆性骨折护理与预防中的质量改进措施。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019 Dec;17(6):510-520. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00544-8.
7
Osteoporotic Fracture Program management: who should be in charge? A comparative survey of knowledge in orthopaedic surgeons and internists.骨质疏松性骨折项目管理:应由谁负责?骨科医生和内科医生知识的比较调查。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Oct;99(6):723-30. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
8
A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures.改善脆性骨折患者护理的全球行动呼吁。
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1393-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
9
Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture.椎体骨折后骨质疏松症的筛查和治疗率。
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Fragility Fracture Systems: International Perspectives - Asia & Australia.脆性骨折系统:国际视角——亚洲与澳大利亚
OTA Int. 2022 Jun 9;5(3 Suppl):e195. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000195. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The global burden of fragility fractures - what are the differences, and where are the gaps.脆性骨折的全球负担——差异何在,差距在哪。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Sep;36(3):101777. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101777. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Quality improvement initiatives in the care and prevention of fragility fractures in the Asia Pacific region.亚太地区脆性骨折护理和预防的质量改进措施。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Aug 20;17(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01153-2.
3
An 11-year review of hip fracture hospitalisations, health outcomes, and predictors of access to in-hospital rehabilitation for adults ≥ 65 years living with and without dementia: a population-based cohort study.
一项针对≥65 岁患有和不患有痴呆症的成年人髋关节骨折住院、健康结局以及住院康复机会预测因素的 11 年回顾性研究:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Mar;31(3):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05260-8. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
4
Prescription practices of anti-osteoporosis medication among Thai orthopedic surgeons (PAMOS study) in osteoporotic hip fracture.泰国骨科医生治疗骨质疏松性髋部骨折的抗骨质疏松药物处方习惯(PAMOS 研究)
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Jun 18;14(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0616-z.
5
Dementia is Associated with an Increased Risk of Hip Fractures: A Nationwide Analysis in Korea.痴呆症与髋部骨折风险增加有关:韩国的一项全国性分析
J Clin Neurol. 2019 Apr;15(2):243-249. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.2.243.
6
An updated hip fracture projection in Asia: The Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies study.亚洲髋部骨折最新预测:亚洲骨质疏松症协会联合会研究
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018 Mar;4(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
The Sensitivity of Orthopaedic Surgeons to the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures.骨科医生对脆性骨折二级预防的敏感性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 19;100(24):e153. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01297.
8
A global call to action to improve the care of people with fragility fractures.改善脆性骨折患者护理的全球行动呼吁。
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1393-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
9
Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.关注(治疗)差距:关于预防脆性骨折的当前及未来策略的全球视角
Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1507-1529. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3894-y. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
10
Orthopedic surgeons' attitudes to osteoporosis investigation and management after minimal trauma fracture (MTF).骨科医生对轻微创伤骨折(MTF)后骨质疏松症调查与管理的态度。
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 Dec;12(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0296-x. Epub 2016 Dec 21.