Research and Development Department, Volodalen, Chavéria, France.
Research and Development Department, Volodalen SwissSportLab, Aigle, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 3;19(4):e0300108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300108. eCollection 2024.
Delving into the complexities of embodied cognition unveils the intertwined influence of mind, body, and environment. The connection of physical activity with cognition sparks a hypothesis linking motion and personality traits. Hence, this study explored whether personality traits could be linked to biomechanical variables characterizing running forms. To do so, 80 runners completed three randomized 50-m running-trials at 3.3, 4.2, and 5m/s during which their running biomechanics [ground contact time (tc), flight time (tf), duty factor (DF), step frequency (SF), leg stiffness (kleg), maximal vertical ground reaction force (Fmax), and maximal leg compression of the spring during stance (ΔL)] was evaluated. In addition, participants' personality traits were assessed through the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) test. The MBTI classifies personality traits into one of two possible categories along four axes: extraversion-introversion; sensing-intuition; thinking-feeling; and judging-perceiving. This exploratory study offers compelling evidence that personality traits, specifically sensing and intuition, are associated with distinct running biomechanics. Individuals classified as sensing demonstrated a more grounded running style characterized by prolonged tc, shorter tf, higher DF, and greater ΔL compared to intuition individuals (p≤0.02). Conversely, intuition runners exhibited a more dynamic and elastic running style with a shorter tc and higher kleg than their sensing counterparts (p≤0.02). Post-hoc tests revealed a significant difference in tc between intuition and sensing runners at all speeds (p≤0.02). According to the definition of each category provided by the MBTI, sensing individuals tend to focus on concrete facts and physical realities while intuition individuals emphasize abstract concepts and patterns of information. These results suggest that runners with sensing and intuition personality traits differ in their ability to use their lower limb structures as springs. Intuition runners appeared to rely more in the stretch-shortening cycle to energetically optimize their running style while sensing runners seemed to optimize running economy by promoting more forward progression than vertical oscillations. This study underscores the intriguing interplay between personality traits of individuals and their preferred movement patterns.
深入研究体现认知,揭示了思维、身体和环境的相互交织影响。身体活动与认知的联系激发了一个假设,即运动与个性特征有关。因此,本研究探讨了个性特征是否可以与表征跑步形式的生物力学变量相关联。为此,80 名跑步者在 3.3、4.2 和 5m/s 三个随机的 50m 跑步试验中完成了 3 次跑步,在此期间评估了他们的跑步生物力学(地面接触时间 (tc)、腾空时间 (tf)、动作系数 (DF)、步频 (SF)、腿部刚度 (kleg)、最大垂直地面反作用力 (Fmax) 和站立时的腿部最大压缩弹簧长度(ΔL))。此外,参与者的个性特征通过 Myers-Briggs 类型指标(MBTI)测试进行评估。MBTI 沿四个轴将个性特征分为两种可能的类别:外向-内向;感觉-直觉;思维-感觉;判断-感知。这项探索性研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明个性特征,特别是感觉和直觉,与独特的跑步生物力学相关。与直觉个体相比,被归类为感觉的个体表现出更接地的跑步风格,其 tc 更长,tf 更短,DF 更高,ΔL 更大(p≤0.02)。相反,直觉跑步者表现出更具活力和弹性的跑步风格,其 tc 更短,kleg 更高(p≤0.02)。事后检验表明,在所有速度下,直觉和感觉跑步者之间的 tc 存在显著差异(p≤0.02)。根据 MBTI 提供的每个类别的定义,感觉个体倾向于关注具体事实和物理现实,而直觉个体则强调抽象概念和信息模式。这些结果表明,具有感觉和直觉个性特征的跑步者在利用下肢结构作为弹簧的能力上存在差异。直觉跑步者似乎更依赖于拉伸-缩短周期来使他们的跑步风格更具活力,而感觉跑步者则似乎通过促进向前推进而不是垂直振动来优化跑步经济性。这项研究强调了个人个性特征和他们喜欢的运动模式之间的有趣互动。