Hahad Omar, Döge Julia, Bahr-Hamm Katharina, Beutel Manfred E, Kontohow-Beckers Konstantin, Schuster Alexander K, Keller Karsten, Hobohm Lukas, Schmitt Volker H, Gianicolo Emilio, Lackner Karl J, Daiber Andreas, Wild Philipp S, Hackenberg Berit, Münzel Thomas
Department of Cardiology - Cardiology I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):118-123. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00668-9. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
The pathophysiology of tinnitus is not yet fully understood. Although there is a large amount of evidence associating traffic noise exposure with non-auditory health outcomes, there is no evidence regarding the impact of noise annoyance on auditory disorders such as tinnitus.
Thus, we aimed to investigate the association between noise annoyance due to different sources and tinnitus presence and distress in the general population.
Data of 6813 participants from a large German population-based cohort were used (Gutenberg Health Study). Participants were asked about the presence of tinnitus and how much they were bothered by it. In addition, information on annoyance from road traffic, aircraft, railways, industrial, and neighborhood noise during the day and sleep was collected through validated questionnaires.
The prevalence of tinnitus was 27.3%, and the predominant sources of noise annoyance in these subjects were aircraft, neighborhood, and road traffic noise. Overall, logistic regression results demonstrated consistent positive associations between annoyance due to different noise sources and prevalent risk of tinnitus with increases in odds ratios ranging from 4 to 11% after adjustment for sex, age, and socioeconomic status. Likewise, consistent increases in odds ratios were observed for tinnitus distress in subjects with prevalent tinnitus. For instance, neighborhood noise annoyance during the sleep was associated with a 26% increase in tinnitus distress (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13; 1.39).
This is the first study investigating the association between noise annoyance and tinnitus presence and distress in a large cohort of the general population. Our results indicate consistent and positive associations between various sources of noise annoyance and tinnitus. These unprecedented findings are highly relevant as noise annoyance and tinnitus are widespread. The precise etiology and locus of tinnitus remain unknown, but excessive noise exposure is thought to be among the major causes. This study suggests that transportation and neighborhood noise levels thought merely to contribute to annoyance and non-auditory health effects may be sufficient to cause or exacerbate tinnitus.
耳鸣的病理生理学尚未完全明了。尽管有大量证据表明接触交通噪音与非听觉健康结果相关,但尚无证据表明噪音烦恼对耳鸣等听觉障碍有何影响。
因此,我们旨在调查不同来源的噪音烦恼与普通人群中耳鸣的存在及困扰之间的关联。
使用了来自德国一项大型基于人群队列研究(古登堡健康研究)的6813名参与者的数据。参与者被问及是否存在耳鸣以及耳鸣对其困扰程度。此外,通过经过验证的问卷收集了有关白天和睡眠期间道路交通、飞机、铁路、工业和邻里噪音造成的烦恼信息。
耳鸣患病率为27.3%,这些受试者中主要的噪音烦恼来源是飞机、邻里和道路交通噪音。总体而言,逻辑回归结果表明,在对性别、年龄和社会经济地位进行调整后,不同噪音源造成的烦恼与耳鸣的患病风险之间存在一致的正相关,优势比增加范围为4%至11%。同样,在患有耳鸣的受试者中,耳鸣困扰的优势比也持续增加。例如,睡眠期间的邻里噪音烦恼与耳鸣困扰增加26%相关(优势比1.26,95%置信区间1.13;1.39)。
这是第一项在一大群普通人群中调查噪音烦恼与耳鸣存在及困扰之间关联的研究。我们的结果表明,各种来源的噪音烦恼与耳鸣之间存在一致的正相关。这些前所未有的发现具有高度相关性,因为噪音烦恼和耳鸣非常普遍。耳鸣的确切病因和部位尚不清楚,但过度接触噪音被认为是主要原因之一。这项研究表明,通常认为仅会导致烦恼和非听觉健康影响的交通和邻里噪音水平可能足以引发或加重耳鸣。