Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education,, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Graduate Research Apprentice, Post grad, Northeastern university, Boston, USA.
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 6;12:483. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129579.2. eCollection 2023.
: The complex nature of maxillofacial injuries can affect the surgical treatment outcomes and general well-being of the patient. To evaluate the efficiency of the surgical treatment, assessment of the quality of life (QOL) of the patients is of vital importance. Due to the absence of an exclusive QOL assessment tool for maxillofacial fractures, we introduce the 'Twenty-point quality of life assessment in facial trauma patients in Indian population'. The aim of this study was to assess and evaluate the QOL following surgical management of maxillofacial trauma patients based on the severity of the injury. : The study consisted of 182 subjects divided into two groups of 91 each (Group A: severe facial injury and Group B: mild to moderate facial injury). The Facial Injury Severity Scale (FISS) was used to determine the severity of facial fractures and injuries. The twenty-point quality of life assessment tool includes Zone 1 (Psychosocial impact) and Zone 2 (Functional and aesthetic impact), with ten domains each to assess QOL. : In Zone 1, the mean scores for Group A and Group B were 38.6 and 39.26, respectively. In Zone 2, Group B (44.56) had higher mean scores compared to Group A (32.92) (p< 0.001). Group B (83.8) had higher mean scores compared to Group A (71.58) when the total of both Zone 1 and Zone 2 were taken into consideration (p<0,001). In Group A, 9 out of 91 patients had a total score of 81- 100 compared to 68 in the same range in Group B. : Proper surgical management with adequate care to the hard and soft tissues can improve the QOL by reducing postoperative psychosocial and functional complications. Aesthetic outcomes play an important role in determining the QOL. Mild/ Moderate injuries show better QOL compared to severe maxillofacial injuries.
: 颌面损伤的复杂性可能会影响手术治疗效果和患者的整体健康状况。为了评估手术治疗的效果,评估患者的生活质量(QOL)至关重要。由于缺乏专门用于评估颌面骨折的 QOL 评估工具,我们引入了“印度人群中颌面创伤患者的 20 分生活质量评估”。本研究的目的是根据损伤严重程度评估和评估颌面创伤患者手术后的生活质量。 : 该研究包括 182 名患者,分为两组,每组 91 人(A 组:严重面部损伤,B 组:轻度至中度面部损伤)。面部损伤严重程度评分(FISS)用于确定面部骨折和损伤的严重程度。20 分生活质量评估工具包括 1 区(心理社会影响)和 2 区(功能和美学影响),每个区有 10 个领域来评估 QOL。 : 在 1 区,A 组和 B 组的平均得分为 38.6 和 39.26。在 2 区,B 组(44.56)的平均得分高于 A 组(32.92)(p<0.001)。当考虑到 1 区和 2 区的总分时,B 组(83.8)的平均得分高于 A 组(71.58)(p<0.001)。在 A 组中,91 名患者中有 9 名患者的总分为 81-100,而 B 组中有 68 名患者在同一范围内。 : 适当的手术治疗和对软硬组织的充分护理可以减少术后心理社会和功能并发症,从而提高生活质量。美学结果在确定生活质量方面起着重要作用。轻度/中度损伤的生活质量优于严重颌面损伤。