• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CFI 评分:一种新的全面面部损伤严重程度评分系统的验证。

The CFI score: Validation of a new comprehensive severity scoring system for facial injuries.

机构信息

Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, ASST-GOM Niguarda, Niguarda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.

Department of Physical Medicine, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.004
PMID:30709761
Abstract

At the time of writing there is no measuring scale for the severity of facial trauma that can effectively summarize its clinical relevance, and can therefore be proposed as a definitive tool in trauma center decision making. This paper introduces a new, simple, comprehensive, and reproducible score for facial trauma, in which its severity is expressed in relation to the surgical duration necessary for definitive treatment. This parameter is identified as the most significant in expressing the commitment of care required. Statistical validation of this comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score involved a sample of 1050 patients, treated by the same team in two highly specialized trauma centers. It demonstrated a linear regression between CFI score and surgical duration, and a high degree of accuracy in forecasting overall surgical time for each type of facial injury. The descriptive capacity of CFI score, and its extremely simple use, make it a perfect tool for widespread application and for facilitating communication inside trauma centers. It also allows the classification of homogeneous groups of patients - a prerequisite for benchmarking and effective analysis of results. The CFI model is definitively proposed for the classification of facial injuries, and therefore for the integration of maxillofacial skills, within the trauma team.

摘要

在撰写本文时,还没有一种能够有效总结其临床相关性的面部创伤严重程度的衡量标准,因此无法作为创伤中心决策的明确工具。本文介绍了一种新的、简单的、全面的、可重复的面部创伤评分方法,其中严重程度与确定性治疗所需的手术时间相关。该参数被确定为表达所需护理承诺的最重要因素。该综合面部损伤(CFI)评分的统计验证涉及到 1050 名患者的样本,这些患者由两个高度专业化的创伤中心的同一团队进行治疗。结果表明,CFI 评分与手术时间之间存在线性回归关系,并且能够非常准确地预测每种类型面部损伤的总手术时间。CFI 评分的描述能力和极其简单的使用使其成为广泛应用和促进创伤中心内部沟通的理想工具。它还允许对同质患者群体进行分类——这是基准测试和有效分析结果的前提。CFI 模型明确用于面部损伤的分类,因此用于创伤团队中颌面技能的整合。

相似文献

1
The CFI score: Validation of a new comprehensive severity scoring system for facial injuries.CFI 评分:一种新的全面面部损伤严重程度评分系统的验证。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
2
Understanding the relevance of comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score: Statistical analysis of overall surgical time and length of stay outcomes.理解全面面部损伤(CFI)评分的相关性:整体手术时间和住院时间结果的统计分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1456-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Are severity and location of facial trauma risk factors for cervical spine injuries? 10-year analysis based on the use of the AO spine injury classification and the comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score.面部创伤的严重程度和部位是否是颈椎损伤的危险因素?基于使用 AO 脊柱损伤分类和综合面部损伤(CFI)评分的 10 年分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):198-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08037-0. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
Characteristics of maxillofacial injuries and safety of in-theater facial fracture repair in severe combat trauma.严重战斗创伤中颌面损伤的特点及战地面部骨折修复的安全性
Mil Med. 2015 Mar;180(3):315-20. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00345.
5
Maxillofacial injuries in multiply injured patients.多发伤患者的颌面损伤
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Aug;34(4):303-8. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(96)90007-8.
6
Facial fractures and concomitant injuries in trauma patients.创伤患者的面部骨折及合并伤
Laryngoscope. 2003 Jan;113(1):102-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200301000-00019.
7
The design and implementation of chinese maxillofacial trauma registry, analysis and injury severity score system.中国颌面创伤登记、分析及损伤严重度评分系统的设计与实施
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):1024-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31809fea9b.
8
Validation of Clinical Criteria for Obtaining Maxillofacial Computed Tomography in Patients With Trauma.创伤患者获取颌面计算机断层扫描临床标准的验证
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1199-202. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001712.
9
Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score as a predictor of surgical time, length of hospital stay, and head injury? Our experience at level I trauma center.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分能否作为手术时间、住院时间和头部损伤的预测指标?我们在一级创伤中心的经验。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan-Apr;13(1):32-38. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_306_21. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
The Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) Score Is an Early Predictor of the Management for Mild, Moderate and Severe Facial Trauma.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分是轻度、中度和重度面部创伤治疗的早期预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3281. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123281.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of quality of life in patients with surgically treated maxillofacial fractures.评估手术治疗颌面骨折患者的生活质量。
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 6;12:483. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129579.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Correlation between Malocclusion and Mandibular Fractures: An Experimental Study Comparing Dynamic Finite Element Models and Clinical Case Studies.错颌畸形与下颌骨骨折的相关性:一项比较动态有限元模型与临床病例研究的实验性研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;11(3):274. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030274.
3
Can an App-Based Maxillofacial Trauma Score Predict the Operative Time, ICU Need and Length of Stay?
基于应用程序的颌面创伤评分能否预测手术时间、重症监护需求和住院时间?
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2022 Dec;15(4):332-339. doi: 10.1177/19433875211055598. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score as a predictor of surgical time, length of hospital stay, and head injury? Our experience at level I trauma center.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分能否作为手术时间、住院时间和头部损伤的预测指标?我们在一级创伤中心的经验。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan-Apr;13(1):32-38. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_306_21. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
The Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) Score Is an Early Predictor of the Management for Mild, Moderate and Severe Facial Trauma.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分是轻度、中度和重度面部创伤治疗的早期预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3281. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123281.
6
Analysis of Different Safety Devices in the Prevention of Motorcycle-Related Craniofacial Trauma - A Retrospective Study.不同安全装置预防摩托车相关颅面创伤的分析——一项回顾性研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jul-Dec;11(2):293-297. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_203_21. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
"6 Anatomical Landmarks" Technique for Satisfactory Free-Hand Orbital Reconstruction With Standard Preformed Titanium Mesh.采用标准预制钛网的“6个解剖标志”技术实现满意的徒手眼眶重建。
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2022 Mar;15(1):51-57. doi: 10.1177/19433875211007614. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
Classifying and standardizing panfacial trauma according to anatomic categories and Facial Injury Severity Scale: a 10-year retrospective study.根据解剖部位和面部损伤严重程度评分对全颜面创伤进行分类和标准化:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Nov 1;21(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01900-w.
9
Epidemiology of Maxillo-Facial Trauma During COVID-19 Lockdown: Reports From the Trauma Center in Milan.新冠疫情封锁期间颌面创伤的流行病学:来自米兰创伤中心的报告
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021 Dec;14(4):277-283. doi: 10.1177/1943387520983119. Epub 2020 Dec 23.