• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解全面面部损伤(CFI)评分的相关性:整体手术时间和住院时间结果的统计分析。

Understanding the relevance of comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score: Statistical analysis of overall surgical time and length of stay outcomes.

机构信息

Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, ASST-GOM Niguarda, Niguarda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.

Department of Medical Physics, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1456-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.005
PMID:31375397
Abstract

Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score is a powerful and extremely simple scale used to grade the clinical severity of all facial injuries, and is expressed in terms of the overall surgical time needed for definitive treatment. Its statistical validation was previously reported in 2019. The aim of this study was to investigate further the link with duration of surgery, applying the score to a larger sample of patients, and to evaluate the relationship between CFI score and other extremely relevant dependent variables: length of stay (LOS) in high care units (HCU) and in intensive care units (ICU). 1406 patients with diagnosis of at least one facial bone fracture, and treated by the same team in two highly specialized trauma centers, were studied. For each patient a specific CFI score is assigned and overall surgical time, length of stay, and presence of associated injuries were recorded. Data were divided into six clusters according to CFI score: (1) 0-5, (2) 6-10, (3) 11-15, (4) 16-20, (5) 21-25, and (6) >25. Regressions between CFI clusters and duration of surgery (minutes), LOS in ICU (days), and in HCU (days) were established. In addition, the presence of associated head and/or somatovisceral injuries was analyzed and related to CFI score. Statistical analysis confirmed linear regression existing between each CFI cluster and overall surgical time (p < 0.00001), with improved significance of the results using median values of surgical duration for each cluster (p = 0.0001). It also demonstrated the existence of linear regression between all CFI clusters and LOS in HCU (p = 0.0001) and between CFI clusters 3-6 and median values of LOS in ICU (p = 0.0001). Finally, associated injuries were observed to be more frequent in high CFI score clusters, occurring in around 90% of patients with a CFI score >25 (p < 0.00001). Association of head and facial injuries play a major role in high LOS in ICU values, whereas coexistence of facial, head and somatovisceral involvement increases LOS in ICU to over twice that for single association. Surgical time and length of stay are outcomes traditionally used to assess the statistical significance of many new proposed trauma score. The strong correlation demonstrated between CFI score and each of these variables confirms its value and reliability. CFI score is proven to be an ideal, simple, informative, and reproducible tool for measuring severity of facial injuries and their clinical impact. It allows correlation with associated head and somatovisceral injuries, focusing attention on the interesting field of reciprocal influences in simultaneous, multidistrectual involvement. None of the previously proposed facial injury severity scales have offered such informative and statistically significant features.

摘要

全面面部损伤 (CFI) 评分是一种强大且极其简单的量表,用于评估所有面部损伤的临床严重程度,并以明确治疗所需的整体手术时间来表示。其统计验证已于 2019 年报告。本研究的目的是进一步研究与手术时间的关系,将该评分应用于更大的患者样本,并评估 CFI 评分与其他极其相关的因变量之间的关系:高护理单元 (HCU) 和重症监护病房 (ICU) 的住院时间 (LOS)。研究了在两个高度专业化的创伤中心由同一团队治疗的至少有一个面部骨折诊断的 1406 名患者。为每位患者分配特定的 CFI 评分,并记录总体手术时间、住院时间和伴随损伤的情况。根据 CFI 评分将数据分为六个聚类:(1) 0-5,(2) 6-10,(3) 11-15,(4) 16-20,(5) 21-25,和 (6) >25。建立了 CFI 聚类与手术时间(分钟)、ICU 住院时间(天)和 HCU 住院时间(天)之间的回归关系。此外,还分析了伴随的头部和/或躯体内脏损伤的存在情况,并将其与 CFI 评分相关联。统计分析证实,每个 CFI 聚类与整体手术时间之间存在线性回归关系(p<0.00001),使用每个聚类的手术持续时间中位数时,结果的显著性得到改善(p=0.0001)。它还表明,所有 CFI 聚类与 HCU 住院时间(p=0.0001)和 CFI 聚类 3-6 与 ICU 住院时间中位数(p=0.0001)之间存在线性回归关系。最后,观察到高 CFI 评分聚类中更频繁地发生伴随的头部和面部损伤,约 90%的 CFI 评分>25 的患者发生这种情况(p<0.00001)。头部和面部损伤的关联在 ICU 中 LOS 值较高的情况下起着重要作用,而面部、头部和躯体内脏同时受累的共存使 ICU 中的 LOS 增加到两倍以上。手术时间和住院时间是传统上用于评估许多新提出的创伤评分统计意义的结果。CFI 评分与这些变量中的每一个之间的强烈相关性证实了其价值和可靠性。CFI 评分被证明是一种理想的、简单的、信息丰富的、可重复的工具,用于衡量面部损伤的严重程度及其临床影响。它允许与伴随的头部和躯体内脏损伤相关联,将注意力集中在同时多区域受累的相互影响这一有趣领域。以前提出的任何面部损伤严重程度评分都没有提供如此信息丰富和具有统计学意义的特征。

相似文献

1
Understanding the relevance of comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score: Statistical analysis of overall surgical time and length of stay outcomes.理解全面面部损伤(CFI)评分的相关性:整体手术时间和住院时间结果的统计分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1456-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
2
The CFI score: Validation of a new comprehensive severity scoring system for facial injuries.CFI 评分:一种新的全面面部损伤严重程度评分系统的验证。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
3
Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score as a predictor of surgical time, length of hospital stay, and head injury? Our experience at level I trauma center.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分能否作为手术时间、住院时间和头部损伤的预测指标?我们在一级创伤中心的经验。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan-Apr;13(1):32-38. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_306_21. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
Utilization of tracheostomy in craniomaxillofacial trauma at a level-1 trauma center.一级创伤中心中气管切开术在颅颌面创伤中的应用
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):2005-10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.019.
5
Are severity and location of facial trauma risk factors for cervical spine injuries? 10-year analysis based on the use of the AO spine injury classification and the comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score.面部创伤的严重程度和部位是否是颈椎损伤的危险因素?基于使用 AO 脊柱损伤分类和综合面部损伤(CFI)评分的 10 年分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):198-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08037-0. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
6
Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.急诊科创伤主治医生应对新创伤分诊规则的验证
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00022.
7
The Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) Score Is an Early Predictor of the Management for Mild, Moderate and Severe Facial Trauma.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分是轻度、中度和重度面部创伤治疗的早期预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3281. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123281.
8
The burden of facial trauma on mortality in patients with multiple injuries: A single-center analysis of 1862 motorcycle accidents.多发伤患者面部创伤对死亡率的影响:1862 例摩托车事故的单中心分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Feb;50(2):146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
9
Do facial fractures protect the brain or are they a marker for severe head injury?面部骨折是对大脑起到保护作用,还是严重头部损伤的一个标志?
Am Surg. 2002 May;68(5):477-81.
10
The new injury severity score is a better predictor of extended hospitalization and intensive care unit admission than the injury severity score in patients with multiple orthopaedic injuries.对于多发骨科损伤患者,新损伤严重程度评分比损伤严重程度评分更能预测延长住院时间和入住重症监护病房的情况。
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Aug;17(7):508-12. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of quality of life in patients with surgically treated maxillofacial fractures.评估手术治疗颌面骨折患者的生活质量。
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 6;12:483. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129579.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Correlation between Malocclusion and Mandibular Fractures: An Experimental Study Comparing Dynamic Finite Element Models and Clinical Case Studies.错颌畸形与下颌骨骨折的相关性:一项比较动态有限元模型与临床病例研究的实验性研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;11(3):274. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030274.
3
Pressure Garment Therapy with Custom Facial Mask in Complex and Traumatic Facial Wounds: Case Series.
定制面罩压力衣疗法治疗复杂创伤性面部伤口:病例系列
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2023 Apr-Jun;16(2):156-158. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_106_22.
4
The Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) Score Is an Early Predictor of the Management for Mild, Moderate and Severe Facial Trauma.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分是轻度、中度和重度面部创伤治疗的早期预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3281. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123281.
5
Analysis of Different Safety Devices in the Prevention of Motorcycle-Related Craniofacial Trauma - A Retrospective Study.不同安全装置预防摩托车相关颅面创伤的分析——一项回顾性研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jul-Dec;11(2):293-297. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_203_21. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
"6 Anatomical Landmarks" Technique for Satisfactory Free-Hand Orbital Reconstruction With Standard Preformed Titanium Mesh.采用标准预制钛网的“6个解剖标志”技术实现满意的徒手眼眶重建。
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2022 Mar;15(1):51-57. doi: 10.1177/19433875211007614. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
7
Classifying and standardizing panfacial trauma according to anatomic categories and Facial Injury Severity Scale: a 10-year retrospective study.根据解剖部位和面部损伤严重程度评分对全颜面创伤进行分类和标准化:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Nov 1;21(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01900-w.
8
Epidemiology of Maxillo-Facial Trauma During COVID-19 Lockdown: Reports From the Trauma Center in Milan.新冠疫情封锁期间颌面创伤的流行病学:来自米兰创伤中心的报告
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021 Dec;14(4):277-283. doi: 10.1177/1943387520983119. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
Microbiological Characteristics and Surgical Management of Animal-Bite-Related Oral & Maxillofacial Injuries: A Single Center's Experience.动物咬伤相关口腔颌面部损伤的微生物学特征及外科治疗:单中心经验
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;10(8):998. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10080998.
10
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma in Dogs-Part I: Fracture Location, Morphology and Etiology.犬颅颌面创伤 - 第一部分:骨折部位、形态学及病因学
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Apr 28;7:241. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00241. eCollection 2020.