• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合面部损伤(CFI)评分是轻度、中度和重度面部创伤治疗的早期预测指标。

The Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) Score Is an Early Predictor of the Management for Mild, Moderate and Severe Facial Trauma.

作者信息

Canzi Gabriele, Aseni Paolo, De Ponti Elena, Cimbanassi Stefania, Sammartano Fabrizio, Novelli Giorgio, Sozzi Davide

机构信息

Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Emergency, ASST-GOM Niguarda, Niguarda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy.

Department of Emergency, ASST-GOM Niguarda, Niguarda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3281. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123281.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11123281
PMID:35743355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9225200/
Abstract

Identifying groups of patients with homogeneous characteristics and comparable outcomes improves clinical activity, patients' management, and scientific research. This study aims to define mild, moderate, and severe facial trauma by validating two cut-off values of the Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) score and describing their foreseeable clinical needs to create a useful guide in patient management, starting from the first evaluation. The individual CFI score, overall surgical time, and length of hospitalization are calculated for a sample of 1400 facial-injured patients. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and the corresponding Area Under the Curve (AUC) is tested, and a CFI score ≥4 is selected to discriminate patients undergoing surgical management under general anesthesia (Positive Predictive Value, PPV of 91.4%), while a CFI score ≥10 is selected to identify patients undergoing major surgical procedures (Negative Predictive Value, NPV of 91.7%). These results are enhanced by the consensual trend of Length of Stay outcome. The use of the CFI score allows us to distinguish between the "Mild facial trauma" with a low risk of hospitalization for surgical treatment, the "Moderate facial trauma" with a high probability of surgical treatment, and the "Severe facial trauma" that requires long-lasting surgery and hospital stay, with an increased incidence of Intensive Care Unit admission.

摘要

识别具有同质特征和可比结果的患者群体可改善临床活动、患者管理和科学研究。本研究旨在通过验证综合面部损伤(CFI)评分的两个临界值来定义轻度、中度和重度面部创伤,并描述其可预见的临床需求,以便从首次评估开始,为患者管理创建一个有用的指南。计算了1400例面部受伤患者样本的个体CFI评分、总体手术时间和住院时间。进行了受试者操作特征(ROC)分析并测试了相应的曲线下面积(AUC),选择CFI评分≥4来区分接受全身麻醉手术治疗的患者(阳性预测值,PPV为91.4%),而选择CFI评分≥10来识别接受大型外科手术的患者(阴性预测值,NPV为91.7%)。住院时间结果的一致趋势进一步强化了这些结果。CFI评分的使用使我们能够区分手术治疗住院风险低的“轻度面部创伤”、手术治疗可能性高的“中度面部创伤”以及需要长期手术和住院、重症监护病房入院率增加的“重度面部创伤”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/523a154bcc18/jcm-11-03281-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/23d46a6a9a5a/jcm-11-03281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/d0d1a8486fd4/jcm-11-03281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/0f9953138ef3/jcm-11-03281-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/560955c7726a/jcm-11-03281-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/523a154bcc18/jcm-11-03281-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/23d46a6a9a5a/jcm-11-03281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/d0d1a8486fd4/jcm-11-03281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/0f9953138ef3/jcm-11-03281-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/560955c7726a/jcm-11-03281-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/776a/9225200/523a154bcc18/jcm-11-03281-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) Score Is an Early Predictor of the Management for Mild, Moderate and Severe Facial Trauma.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分是轻度、中度和重度面部创伤治疗的早期预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3281. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123281.
2
Understanding the relevance of comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score: Statistical analysis of overall surgical time and length of stay outcomes.理解全面面部损伤(CFI)评分的相关性:整体手术时间和住院时间结果的统计分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1456-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Are severity and location of facial trauma risk factors for cervical spine injuries? 10-year analysis based on the use of the AO spine injury classification and the comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score.面部创伤的严重程度和部位是否是颈椎损伤的危险因素?基于使用 AO 脊柱损伤分类和综合面部损伤(CFI)评分的 10 年分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):198-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08037-0. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
Comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score as a predictor of surgical time, length of hospital stay, and head injury? Our experience at level I trauma center.综合面部损伤(CFI)评分能否作为手术时间、住院时间和头部损伤的预测指标?我们在一级创伤中心的经验。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan-Apr;13(1):32-38. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_306_21. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
The CFI score: Validation of a new comprehensive severity scoring system for facial injuries.CFI 评分:一种新的全面面部损伤严重程度评分系统的验证。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
6
Validation of the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage Score in Injured Pediatric Patients.验证小儿生理与解剖分诊评分在受伤小儿患者中的应用。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):363-369. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004552. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
The burden of facial trauma on mortality in patients with multiple injuries: A single-center analysis of 1862 motorcycle accidents.多发伤患者面部创伤对死亡率的影响:1862 例摩托车事故的单中心分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Feb;50(2):146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
8
[Establishment of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome early warning score in patients with severe trauma and its clinical significance: a multicenter study].[严重创伤患者多器官功能障碍综合征预警评分的建立及其临床意义:一项多中心研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jan;30(1):41-46. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.01.008.
9
Early versus delayed repair of facial fractures in the multiply injured patient.多发伤患者面部骨折的早期修复与延迟修复
Am Surg. 1999 Aug;65(8):790-3.
10
Application of a facial injury severity scale in craniomaxillofacial trauma.面部损伤严重程度量表在颅颌面创伤中的应用。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Mar;64(3):408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the correlation of epidemiological and clinical factors with facial injury severity scores in maxillofacial trauma: a comprehensive analysis.探索颌面创伤中流行病学和临床因素与面部损伤严重程度评分的相关性:一项综合分析。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Feb 17;6:1532133. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1532133. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of quality of life in patients with surgically treated maxillofacial fractures.评估手术治疗颌面骨折患者的生活质量。
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 6;12:483. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129579.2. eCollection 2023.
3
Correlation between Malocclusion and Mandibular Fractures: An Experimental Study Comparing Dynamic Finite Element Models and Clinical Case Studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Different Safety Devices in the Prevention of Motorcycle-Related Craniofacial Trauma - A Retrospective Study.不同安全装置预防摩托车相关颅面创伤的分析——一项回顾性研究
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jul-Dec;11(2):293-297. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_203_21. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Correlating the Bony Facial Trauma Score with Clinical Outcomes.将面部骨创伤评分与临床结果相关联。
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2023 Jan-Feb;25(1):16-21. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0322. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
3
The burden of facial trauma on mortality in patients with multiple injuries: A single-center analysis of 1862 motorcycle accidents.
错颌畸形与下颌骨骨折的相关性:一项比较动态有限元模型与临床病例研究的实验性研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;11(3):274. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030274.
4
Repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology of facial fractures: a retrospective cohort study.2019冠状病毒病大流行对面部骨折流行病学的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;28(2):945-955. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01200-3. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
多发伤患者面部创伤对死亡率的影响:1862 例摩托车事故的单中心分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Feb;50(2):146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Classifying and standardizing panfacial trauma according to anatomic categories and Facial Injury Severity Scale: a 10-year retrospective study.根据解剖部位和面部损伤严重程度评分对全颜面创伤进行分类和标准化:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Nov 1;21(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01900-w.
5
Epidemiology of Maxillo-Facial Trauma During COVID-19 Lockdown: Reports From the Trauma Center in Milan.新冠疫情封锁期间颌面创伤的流行病学:来自米兰创伤中心的报告
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021 Dec;14(4):277-283. doi: 10.1177/1943387520983119. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
Understanding the relevance of comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score: Statistical analysis of overall surgical time and length of stay outcomes.理解全面面部损伤(CFI)评分的相关性:整体手术时间和住院时间结果的统计分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;47(9):1456-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
7
The CFI score: Validation of a new comprehensive severity scoring system for facial injuries.CFI 评分:一种新的全面面部损伤严重程度评分系统的验证。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;47(3):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
Can a Facial Injury Severity Scale Be Used to Predict the Need for Surgical Intervention and Time of Hospitalization?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;76(6):1280.e1-1280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
9
Maxillofacial trauma scoring systems.
Injury. 2016 Jul;47(7):1388-92. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Role of maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in determining the economic burden to maxillofacial trauma patients in India.颌面创伤评分系统在确定印度颌面创伤患者经济负担中的作用。
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Apr;7(4):38-43.