Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 4;14(1):7923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58408-w.
Stress arousal reappraisal (SAR) and stress-is-enhancing (SIE) mindset interventions aim to promote a more adaptive stress response by educating individuals about the functionality of stress. As part of this framework, an adaptive stress response is coupled with improved performance on stressful tasks. The goal of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on task performance. The literature search yielded 44 effect sizes, and a random-effects model with Knapp-Hartung adjustment was used to pool them. The results revealed an overall small significant improvement in task performance (d = 0.23, p < 0.001). The effect size was significantly larger for mixed interventions (i.e., SAR/SIE mindset instructions combined with additional content, k = 5, d = 0.45, p = 0.004) than SAR-only interventions (k = 33, d = 0.22, p < 0.001) and SIE mindset-only interventions (k = 6, d = 0.18, p = 0.22) and tended to be larger for public performance tasks than cognitive written tasks (k = 14, d = 0.34, p < 0.001 vs. k = 30, d = 0.20, p = 0.002). Although SAR and SIE mindset interventions are not "silver bullets", they offer a promising cost-effective low-threshold approach to improve performance across various domains.
应激唤醒再评价 (SAR) 和应激增强 (SIE) 思维模式干预旨在通过教育个体了解应激的功能,促进更适应的应激反应。作为该框架的一部分,适应性应激反应与在应激任务上表现的提高相关联。本荟萃分析的目的是评估这些干预措施对任务表现的有效性。文献检索产生了 44 个效应量,并使用带有 Knapp-Hartung 调整的随机效应模型对它们进行了汇总。结果显示,任务表现总体上有微小但显著的提高(d=0.23,p<0.001)。混合干预(即 SAR/SIE 思维模式指导与其他内容相结合)的效应量显著大于 SAR 单一干预(k=5,d=0.45,p=0.004)和 SIE 思维模式单一干预(k=6,d=0.18,p=0.22),且在公开表现任务中比在认知书面任务中更倾向于更大(k=14,d=0.34,p<0.001 与 k=30,d=0.20,p=0.002)。尽管 SAR 和 SIE 思维模式干预不是“灵丹妙药”,但它们提供了一种有前途的、具有成本效益的低门槛方法,可以提高各种领域的表现。