Rehman Muhammad Ali, Abd Rahman Norinah, Ibrahim Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi, Kamal Norashikin Ahmad, Ahmad Asmadi
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Smart and Sustainable Township Research Centre, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, UKM, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 29;10(7):e28854. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28854. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
Soil erodibility (K) is an essential component in estimating soil loss indicating the soil's susceptibility to detach and transport. Data Computing and processing methods, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and multiple linear regression (MLR), have proven to be helpful in the development of predictive models for natural hazards. The present case study aims to assess the efficiency of MLR and ANN models to forecast soil erodibility in Peninsular Malaysia. A total of 103 samples were collected from various sites and K values were calculated using the Tew equation developed for Malaysian soil. From several extracted parameters, the outcomes of correlation and principal component analysis (PCA) revealed the influencing factors to be used in the development of ANN and MLR models. Based on the correlation and PCA results, two sets of influencing factors were employed to develop predictive models. Two MLR (MLR-1 and MLR-2) models and four neural networks (NN-1, NN-2, NN-3, and NN-4) optimized using Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and scaled conjugate gradient (SCG) were developed and evaluated. The model performance validation was conducted using the coefficient of determination (R), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE). The analysis showed that ANN models outperformed MLR models. The R values of 0.446 (MLR-1), 0.430 (MLR-2), 0.894 (NN-1), 0.855 (NN-2), 0.940 (NN-3), and 0.826 (NN-4); MSE values of 0.0000306 (MLR-1), 0.0000315 (MLR-2), 0.0000158 (NN-1), 0.0000261 (NN-2), 0.0000318 (NN-3), and 0.0000216 (NN-4) suggested the higher accuracy and lower modelling error of ANN models as compared with MLR. This study could provide an empirical basis and methodological support for K factor estimation in the region.
土壤可蚀性(K)是估算土壤流失的一个重要组成部分,它表明了土壤被侵蚀和搬运的易感性。数据计算和处理方法,如人工神经网络(ANN)和多元线性回归(MLR),已被证明有助于开发自然灾害预测模型。本案例研究旨在评估MLR和ANN模型预测马来西亚半岛土壤可蚀性的效率。从不同地点总共采集了103个样本,并使用为马来西亚土壤开发的Tew方程计算了K值。从几个提取的参数中,相关性和主成分分析(PCA)的结果揭示了用于开发ANN和MLR模型的影响因素。基于相关性和PCA结果,采用两组影响因素来开发预测模型。开发并评估了两个MLR(MLR-1和MLR-2)模型以及四个使用Levenberg-Marquardt(LM)和缩放共轭梯度(SCG)优化的神经网络(NN-1、NN-2、NN-3和NN-4)。使用决定系数(R)、均方误差(MSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)和Nash-Sutcliffe效率系数(NSE)对模型性能进行验证。分析表明,ANN模型优于MLR模型。MLR-1的R值为0.446、MLR-2的R值为0.430、NN-1的R值为0.894、NN-2的R值为0.855、NN-3的R值为0.940、NN-4的R值为0.826;MLR-1的MSE值为0.0000306、MLR-2的MSE值为0.0000315、NN-1的MSE值为0.0000158、NN-2的MSE值为0.0000261、NN-3的MSE值为0.0000318、NN-4的MSE值为0.0000216,这表明与MLR相比,ANN模型具有更高的准确性和更低的建模误差。本研究可为该地区K因子估算提供实证依据和方法支持。