• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习的预后生物标志物对结直肠癌患者进行风险分层是否具有成本效益?

Is Risk-Stratifying Patients with Colorectal Cancer Using a Deep Learning-Based Prognostic Biomarker Cost-Effective?

机构信息

Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(6):679-691. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01371-1. Epub 2024 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01371-1
PMID:38584239
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Accurate risk stratification of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer (CRC) prior to treatment selection enables limited health resources to be efficiently allocated to patients who are likely to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of a recently developed deep learning-based prognostic method, Histotyping, from the perspective of the Norwegian healthcare system.

METHODS

Two partitioned survival models were developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of Histotyping for two treatment cohorts: patients with CRC stage II and III. For each of the two cohorts, Histotyping was used for risk stratification to assign adjuvant chemotherapy and was compared with the standard of care (SOC) (adjuvant chemotherapy to all patients). Health outcomes measured in the model were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life years (LYs) gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the impact of uncertainty. Scenario analyses were performed to assess the impact of the parameters with the greatest uncertainty.

RESULTS

Risk-stratifying patients with CRC stage II and III using Histotyping was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared to SOC. In patients with CRC stage II, the net monetary benefit of Histotyping was 270,934 Norwegian kroners (NOK) (year of valuation is 2021), and the net health benefit of Histotyping was 0.99. In stage III, the net monetary benefit of Histotyping was 195,419 NOK, and the net health benefit of Histotyping was 0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-stratifying patients with CRC using Histotyping prior to the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective strategy in Norway.

摘要

目的

在选择治疗方案之前,对 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌(CRC)患者进行准确的风险分层,使有限的卫生资源能够有效地分配给可能从辅助化疗中获益的患者。我们旨在从挪威医疗保健系统的角度调查最近开发的基于深度学习的预后方法 Histotyping 的成本效益。

方法

开发了两个分区生存模型来评估 Histotyping 在两个治疗队列中的成本效益:CRC 分期为 II 期和 III 期的患者。对于两个队列中的每一个,Histotyping 用于风险分层以分配辅助化疗,并与标准护理(SOC)(所有患者均接受辅助化疗)进行比较。模型中测量的健康结果是质量调整生命年(QALY)和生命年(LY)。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析以确定不确定性的影响。进行了情景分析以评估具有最大不确定性的参数的影响。

结果

与 SOC 相比,使用 Histotyping 对 CRC 分期 II 期和 III 期患者进行风险分层具有优势(成本更低,效果更好)。在 CRC 分期 II 期患者中,Histotyping 的净货币收益为 270,934 挪威克朗(NOK)(估值年份为 2021 年),Histotyping 的净健康收益为 0.99。在 III 期,Histotyping 的净货币收益为 195,419 NOK,Histotyping 的净健康收益为 0.71。

结论

在挪威,在给予辅助化疗之前使用 Histotyping 对 CRC 患者进行风险分层可能是一种具有成本效益的策略。

相似文献

1
Is Risk-Stratifying Patients with Colorectal Cancer Using a Deep Learning-Based Prognostic Biomarker Cost-Effective?基于深度学习的预后生物标志物对结直肠癌患者进行风险分层是否具有成本效益?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(6):679-691. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01371-1. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
3-month versus 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer: 3-year follow-up of the SCOT non-inferiority RCT.高危 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者的 3 个月与 6 个月辅助化疗:SCOT 非劣效 RCT 的 3 年随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(64):1-88. doi: 10.3310/hta23640.
3
Cost-Utility of a Prognostic Test Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.一项指导早期非小细胞肺癌辅助化疗决策的预后测试的成本效益分析
Oncologist. 2016 Feb;21(2):196-204. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0162. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
4
A retrospective analysis using deep-learning models for prediction of survival outcome and benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III colorectal cancer.使用深度学习模型对 II/III 期结直肠癌的生存结局和辅助化疗获益进行预测的回顾性分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug;148(8):1955-1963. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03976-5. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Identification and Construction of Combinatory Cancer Hallmark-Based Gene Signature Sets to Predict Recurrence and Chemotherapy Benefit in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.基于组合癌症特征的基因签名集的鉴定和构建,以预测 II 期结直肠癌的复发和化疗获益。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):37-45. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3413.
6
Cost-effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy Versus No Consolidation Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.度伐利尤单抗巩固治疗与放化疗后不巩固治疗用于意大利国家卫生服务体系中 III 期非小细胞肺癌的成本效果和净货币收益。
Clin Ther. 2020 May;42(5):830-847. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
A clinical decision support system optimising adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancers by integrating deep learning and pathological staging markers: a development and validation study.通过深度学习和病理分期标志物整合优化结直肠癌辅助化疗的临床决策支持系统:一项开发和验证研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Sep;23(9):1221-1232. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00391-6. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
8
Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Targeted Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for Early Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Based on Biomarker Profiles.基于生物标志物特征的早期结直肠腺癌靶向手术和内镜治疗的成本效益评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e1919963. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19963.
9
Survival and costs of colorectal cancer treatment and effects of changing treatment strategies: a model approach.结直肠癌治疗的生存和成本以及治疗策略变化的影响:一种模型方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Apr;21(3):321-334. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01130-6. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
SCOT: a comparison of cost-effectiveness from a large randomised phase III trial of two durations of adjuvant Oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.SCOT:一项比较两种奥沙利铂联合辅助化疗持续时间的大型随机 III 期临床试验的成本效益的研究。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Nov;119(11):1332-1338. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0319-z. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
A clinical decision support system optimising adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancers by integrating deep learning and pathological staging markers: a development and validation study.通过深度学习和病理分期标志物整合优化结直肠癌辅助化疗的临床决策支持系统:一项开发和验证研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Sep;23(9):1221-1232. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00391-6. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
CDX2 Biomarker Testing and Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: An Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.CDX2生物标志物检测与II期结肠癌辅助治疗:一项探索性成本效益分析
Value Health. 2022 Mar;25(3):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Circulating Tumour DNA as a Potential Cost-Effective Biomarker to Reduce Adjuvant Chemotherapy Overtreatment in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.
循环肿瘤 DNA 作为一种潜在的具有成本效益的生物标志物,可减少 II 期结直肠癌的辅助化疗过度治疗。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Aug;39(8):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01047-0. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
4
Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.结肠癌临床实践指南(2021 年第 2 版),NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Mar 2;19(3):329-359. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012.
5
Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.局限性结肠癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1291-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
Till death do us part: the effect of marital status on health care utilization and costs at end-of-life. A register study on all colorectal cancer decedents in Norway between 2009 and 2013.至死不渝:婚姻状况对终末期卫生保健利用和成本的影响。一项针对 2009 年至 2013 年期间所有在挪威去世的结直肠癌患者的登记研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 13;20(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4794-6.
7
Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study.深度学习预测结直肠癌结局:一项探索性和验证性研究。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 1;395(10221):350-360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32998-8.
8
Survival and costs of colorectal cancer treatment and effects of changing treatment strategies: a model approach.结直肠癌治疗的生存和成本以及治疗策略变化的影响:一种模型方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Apr;21(3):321-334. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01130-6. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
9
Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: A systematic literature review.癌症患者生命质量与生存时间考量的系统文献回顾。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jul;28(7):1367-1380. doi: 10.1002/pon.5054. Epub 2019 May 15.
10
Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications.人工智能在癌症成像中的应用:临床挑战与应用
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Mar;69(2):127-157. doi: 10.3322/caac.21552. Epub 2019 Feb 5.