Suppr超能文献

利用单倍型对玉米地方品种衍生群体内部及群体间进行基因组预测。

Genomic prediction within and across maize landrace derived populations using haplotypes.

作者信息

Lin Yan-Cheng, Mayer Manfred, Valle Torres Daniel, Pook Torsten, Hölker Armin C, Presterl Thomas, Ouzunova Milena, Schön Chris-Carolin

机构信息

Chair of Plant Breeding, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.

Bayer CropScience Deutschland GmbH, Borken, Germany.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2024 Mar 22;15:1351466. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1351466. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Genomic prediction (GP) using haplotypes is considered advantageous compared to GP solely reliant on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), owing to haplotypes' enhanced ability to capture ancestral information and their higher linkage disequilibrium with quantitative trait loci (QTL). Many empirical studies supported the advantages of haplotype-based GP over SNP-based approaches. Nevertheless, the performance of haplotype-based GP can vary significantly depending on multiple factors, including the traits being studied, the genetic structure of the population under investigation, and the particular method employed for haplotype construction. In this study, we compared haplotype and SNP based prediction accuracies in four populations derived from European maize landraces. Populations comprised either doubled haploid lines (DH) derived directly from landraces, or gamete capture lines (GC) derived from crosses of the landraces with an inbred line. For two different landraces, both types of populations were generated, genotyped with 600k SNPs and phenotyped as lines per se for five traits. Our study explores three prediction scenarios: (i) within each of the four populations, (ii) across DH and GC populations from the same landrace, and (iii) across landraces using either DH or GC populations. Three haplotype construction methods were evaluated: 1. fixed-window blocks (FixedHB), 2. LD-based blocks (HaploView), and 3. IBD-based blocks (HaploBlocker). In within population predictions, FixedHB and HaploView methods performed as well as or slightly better than SNPs for all traits. HaploBlocker improved accuracy for certain traits but exhibited inferior performance for others. In prediction across populations, the parameter setting from HaploBlocker which controls the construction of shared haplotypes between populations played a crucial role for obtaining optimal results. When predicting across landraces, accuracies were low for both, SNP and haplotype approaches, but for specific traits substantial improvement was observed with HaploBlocker. This study provides recommendations for optimal haplotype construction and identifies relevant parameters for constructing haplotypes in the context of genomic prediction.

摘要

与仅依赖单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的基因组预测(GP)相比,使用单倍型的基因组预测被认为具有优势,这是因为单倍型捕获祖先信息的能力更强,并且与数量性状位点(QTL)的连锁不平衡程度更高。许多实证研究都支持基于单倍型的GP优于基于SNP的方法。然而,基于单倍型的GP的性能可能会因多种因素而有显著差异,这些因素包括所研究的性状、被调查群体的遗传结构以及用于构建单倍型的具体方法。在本研究中,我们比较了源自欧洲玉米地方品种的四个群体中基于单倍型和基于SNP的预测准确性。群体包括直接从地方品种衍生而来的双单倍体系(DH),或从地方品种与自交系杂交产生的配子捕获系(GC)。对于两个不同的地方品种,都产生了这两种类型的群体,用60万个SNP进行基因分型,并针对五个性状对品系本身进行表型分析。我们的研究探索了三种预测场景:(i)在四个群体中的每一个群体内部,(ii)在来自同一地方品种的DH和GC群体之间,以及(iii)使用DH或GC群体在不同地方品种之间。评估了三种单倍型构建方法:1. 固定窗口块(FixedHB),2. 基于连锁不平衡的块(HaploView),以及3. 基于同源性的块(HaploBlocker)。在群体内部预测中,对于所有性状,FixedHB和HaploView方法的表现与SNP相当或略优于SNP。HaploBlocker提高了某些性状的准确性,但在其他性状上表现较差。在群体间预测中,控制群体间共享单倍型构建的HaploBlocker参数设置对于获得最佳结果起着关键作用。当在不同地方品种间进行预测时,SNP和单倍型方法的准确性都很低,但对于特定性状,HaploBlocker观察到了显著的改进。本研究为最佳单倍型构建提供了建议,并确定了在基因组预测背景下构建单倍型的相关参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e826/10995330/64733c808b9a/fpls-15-1351466-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验