Moss S, Ibbotson B, Prosser H, Goldberg D, Patel P, Simpson N
Hester Adrian Reserach Centre, University of Manchester, UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;32(6):344-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00805440.
The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adults with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) is a semi-structured interview for use with respondents who have learning disability and for key informants. This report investigates the ability of the instrument to detect symptoms that had been found to exist during routine clinical assessment of the patients. Field trials involved 95 referred patients with learning disability and a key informant for each sample member. Clinical opinions of the referring psychiatrists were sought using a symptom checklist. Referrer checklist symptoms and PAS-ADD data were both factor analysed. Validity testing involved (a) computation of correlations between PAS-ADD factors and checklist data and (b) comparison of PAS-ADD and referrers' diagnoses. Results indicated good validity for the PAS-ADD in relation to psychotic symptoms and depressive symptoms. Anxiety symptom identification was not well validated, probably due to small numbers. Expansive mood identified by the referrers was not detected by the PAS-ADD because there is currently no corresponding section in the interview. Where the PAS-ADD produced a diagnosis (in 58 members of the sample), 44 were in agreement with the referrer. Probability of diagnosis by PAS-ADD increased with the number of relevant active symptoms identified by the referrer. The PAS-ADD has been shown in a previous report to have the sensitivity to detect mental disorders not known to psychiatric services. For psychotic and depressive conditions, our results showed that symptom detection was in good agreement with the information provided by the referring psychiatrists on their patients. The PAS-ADD needs a section on hypomania and further investigation of its detection of anxiety disorders.
《发育障碍成人精神科评估量表》(PAS - ADD)是一种半结构化访谈工具,用于有学习障碍的受访者及关键 informant。本报告调查了该工具检测在患者常规临床评估中已发现症状的能力。现场试验涉及95名转诊的有学习障碍患者以及每个样本成员的一名关键 informant。使用症状清单征求转诊精神科医生的临床意见。对转诊医生清单症状和PAS - ADD数据都进行了因子分析。效度测试包括:(a)计算PAS - ADD因子与清单数据之间的相关性;(b)比较PAS - ADD与转诊医生的诊断。结果表明,PAS - ADD在检测精神病性症状和抑郁症状方面效度良好。焦虑症状识别未得到充分验证,可能是因为样本数量少。转诊医生识别出的夸大情绪未被PAS - ADD检测到,因为访谈中目前没有相应部分。当PAS - ADD得出诊断结果时(样本中的58名成员),44例与转诊医生的诊断一致。PAS - ADD诊断的概率随转诊医生识别出的相关活动症状数量增加而增加。在之前的一份报告中已表明PAS - ADD有能力检测精神科服务机构未知的精神障碍。对于精神病性和抑郁性疾病,我们的结果表明症状检测与转诊精神科医生提供的关于其患者的信息高度一致。PAS - ADD需要增加一个关于轻躁狂的部分,并进一步研究其对焦虑症的检测能力。