Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB) and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug 26;25(9):1197-1205. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae093.
We aimed to test the hypothesis if combining coronary artery calcium score (Ca-score) as a quantitative anatomical marker of coronary atherosclerosis with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin as a quantitative biochemical marker of myocardial injury provided incremental value in the detection of functionally relevant coronary artery disease (fCAD) and risk stratification.
Consecutive patients undergoing myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) without prior CAD were enrolled. The diagnosis of fCAD was based on the presence of ischaemia on MPS and coronary angiography; fCAD was centrally adjudicated in the diagnostic and prognostic domain. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). The composite of cardiovascular death and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 730 days was the primary prognostic endpoint. Among 1715 patients eligible for the diagnostic analysis, 399 patients had fCAD. The combination of Ca-score and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) had good diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of fCAD (AUC 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.81), but no incremental value compared with the Ca-score alone (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.81, P = 0.965). Similar results were observed using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.77-0.82) instead of hs-cTnT. Among 1709 patients (99.7%) with available follow-up, 59 patients (3.5%) suffered the composite primary prognostic endpoint (non-fatal AMI, n = 34; CV death, n = 28). Both Ca-score and hs-cTnT had independent prognostic value. Increased risk was restricted to patients with elevation in both markers.
The combination of the Ca-score with hs-cTnT increases the prognostic accuracy for future events but does not provide incremental value vs. the Ca-score alone for the diagnosis of fCAD.
Clinical trial registration: NCT00470587.
我们旨在验证一个假设,如果将冠状动脉钙评分(Ca-score)作为冠状动脉粥样硬化的定量解剖学标志物,与高敏心肌肌钙蛋白作为心肌损伤的定量生化标志物相结合,是否能提高功能性相关冠状动脉疾病(fCAD)的检出率和风险分层能力。
连续纳入了接受心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(MPS)且无 CAD 病史的患者。fCAD 的诊断基于 MPS 和冠状动脉造影的缺血表现;fCAD 在诊断和预后领域由中心裁决。使用接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估诊断准确性。730 天内心血管死亡和非致死性急性心肌梗死(AMI)的复合终点是主要预后终点。在 1715 名符合诊断分析条件的患者中,有 399 名患者患有 fCAD。Ca-score 和高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T(hs-cTnT)联合具有良好的 fCAD 诊断准确性(AUC 为 0.79,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.77-0.81),但与单独使用 Ca-score 相比没有增量价值(AUC 为 0.79,95%CI 为 0.77-0.81,P = 0.965)。使用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 I(AUC 为 0.80,95%CI 为 0.77-0.82)代替 hs-cTnT 也得到了相似的结果。在 1709 名(99.7%)有随访资料的患者中,有 59 名(3.5%)发生了主要复合预后终点(非致死性 AMI,n = 34;心血管死亡,n = 28)。Ca-score 和 hs-cTnT 均具有独立的预后价值。风险增加仅限于两个标志物均升高的患者。
Ca-score 与 hs-cTnT 联合使用可提高未来事件的预后准确性,但与单独使用 Ca-score 相比,在诊断 fCAD 方面没有额外价值。
临床试验注册:NCT00470587。