Unger Elizabeth R, Lin Jin-Mann S, Chen Yang, Cornelius Monica E, Helton Britany, Issa Anindita N, Bertolli Jeanne, Klimas Nancy G, Balbin Elizabeth G, Bateman Lucinda, Lapp Charles W, Springs Wendy, Podell Richard N, Fitzpatrick Trisha, Peterson Daniel L, Gottschalk C Gunnar, Natelson Benjamin H, Blate Michelle, Kogelnik Andreas M, Phan Catrina C
Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA.
Institute for Neuro Immune Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA.
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):1369. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051369.
One of the goals of the Multi-site Clinical Assessment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (MCAM) study was to evaluate whether clinicians experienced in diagnosing and caring for patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) recognized the same clinical entity. We enrolled participants from seven specialty clinics in the United States. We used baseline data (n = 465) on standardized questions measuring general clinical characteristics, functional impairment, post-exertional malaise, fatigue, sleep, neurocognitive/autonomic symptoms, pain, and other symptoms to evaluate whether patient characteristics differed by clinic. We found few statistically significant and no clinically significant differences between clinics in their patients' standardized measures of ME/CFS symptoms and function. Strikingly, patients in each clinic sample and overall showed a wide distribution in all scores and measures. Illness heterogeneity may be an inherent feature of ME/CFS. Presenting research data in scatter plots or histograms will help clarify the challenge. Relying on case-control study designs without subgrouping or stratification of ME/CFS illness characteristics may limit the reproducibility of research findings and could obscure underlying mechanisms.
肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征多中心临床评估(MCAM)研究的目标之一是评估在诊断和治疗肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)患者方面经验丰富的临床医生是否认识到相同的临床实体。我们招募了来自美国七家专科诊所的参与者。我们使用关于测量一般临床特征、功能障碍、运动后不适、疲劳、睡眠、神经认知/自主神经症状、疼痛和其他症状的标准化问题的基线数据(n = 465)来评估患者特征是否因诊所而异。我们发现各诊所在其患者的ME/CFS症状和功能的标准化测量方面几乎没有统计学上的显著差异,也没有临床上的显著差异。引人注目的是,每个诊所样本中的患者以及总体患者在所有分数和测量值上都呈现出广泛的分布。疾病异质性可能是ME/CFS的一个固有特征。以散点图或直方图形式呈现研究数据将有助于阐明这一挑战。依赖没有对ME/CFS疾病特征进行亚组划分或分层的病例对照研究设计可能会限制研究结果的可重复性,并可能掩盖潜在机制。