Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, 142 Flagg Road, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.
American Institutes for Research, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2022 Dec;31(12):3483-3499. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03199-8. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
To evaluate the psychometric properties of the patient-reported outcome measurement information system® (PROMIS) short forms for assessing sleep disturbance, sleep-related impairment, pain interference, and pain behavior, among adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
Data came from the Multi-Site ME/CFS study conducted between 2012 and 2020 at seven ME/CFS specialty clinics across the USA. Baseline and follow-up data from ME/CFS and healthy control (HC) groups were used to examine ceiling/floor effects, internal consistency reliability, differential item functioning (DIF), known-groups validity, and responsiveness.
A total of 945 participants completed the baseline assessment (602 ME/CFS and 338 HC) and 441 ME/CFS also completed the follow-up. The baseline mean T-scores of PROMIS sleep and pain measures ranged from 57.68 to 62.40, about one standard deviation above the national norm (T-score = 50). All four measures showed high internal consistency (ω = 0.92 to 0.97) and no substantial floor/ceiling effects. No DIF was detected by age or sex. Known-groups comparisons among ME/CFS groups with low, medium, and high functional impairment showed significant small-sized differences in scores (η = 0.01 to 0.05) for the two sleep measures and small-to-medium-sized differences (η = 0.01 to 0.15) for the two pain measures. ME/CFS participants had significantly worse scores than HC (η = 0.35 to 0.45) for all four measures. Given the non-interventional nature of the study, responsiveness was evaluated as sensitivity to change over time and the pain interference measure showed an acceptable sensitivity.
The PROMIS sleep and pain measures demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties supporting their use in ME/CFS research and clinical practice.
评估患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)短式量表评估肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)成人睡眠障碍、睡眠相关损伤、疼痛干扰和疼痛行为的心理测量特性。
数据来自于 2012 年至 2020 年期间在美国七个 ME/CFS 专科诊所进行的多中心 ME/CFS 研究。使用 ME/CFS 和健康对照组(HC)的基线和随访数据来评估天花板/地板效应、内部一致性可靠性、差异项目功能(DIF)、已知群体有效性和反应性。
共有 945 名参与者完成了基线评估(602 名 ME/CFS 和 338 名 HC),441 名 ME/CFS 也完成了随访。PROMIS 睡眠和疼痛测量的基线平均 T 分数范围为 57.68 至 62.40,略高于全国平均值(T 分数=50)。所有四项措施的内部一致性均较高(ω=0.92 至 0.97),无明显的天花板/地板效应。未通过年龄或性别检测到 DIF。在 ME/CFS 功能障碍程度低、中、高的三组之间进行的已知群体比较显示,在两项睡眠测量中,评分差异较小(η=0.01 至 0.05),在两项疼痛测量中,评分差异较小至中等(η=0.01 至 0.15)。与 HC 相比,ME/CFS 参与者的所有四项测量评分均明显更差(η=0.35 至 0.45)。鉴于研究的非干预性质,反应性被评估为随时间的变化敏感性,且疼痛干扰测量显示出可接受的敏感性。
PROMIS 睡眠和疼痛测量具有令人满意的心理测量特性,支持其在 ME/CFS 研究和临床实践中的应用。