From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA (Upfill-Brown, Shi, Mooney, Chiou, Brodke, Shah, Kelley, Mayer, Devana, Lee, and SooHoo).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun 15;32(12):550-557. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00771. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
The management of elderly acetabular fractures is complex, with high rates of conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), but potentially higher rates of complications after acute THA.
The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database was queried between 2010 and 2017 for all patients aged 60 years or older who sustained a closed, isolated acetabular fracture and underwent ORIF, THA, or a combination. Chi-square tests and Student t tests were used to identify demographic differences between groups. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate predictors of 30-day readmission and 90-day complications. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the revision surgery-free survival (revision-free survival [RFS]), with revision surgery defined as conversion THA, revision ORIF, or revision THA.
A total of 2,184 surgically managed acetabular fractures in elderly patients were identified, with 1,637 (75.0%) undergoing ORIF and 547 (25.0%) undergoing THA with or without ORIF. Median follow-up was 295 days (interquartile range, 13 to 1720 days). 99.4% of revisions following ORIF were for conversion arthroplasty. Unadjusted KM analysis showed no difference in RFS between ORIF and THA (log-rank test P = 0.27). RFS for ORIF patients was 95.1%, 85.8%, 78.3%, and 71.4% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. RFS for THA patients was 91.6%, 88.9%, 87.2%, and 78.8% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. Roughly 50% of revisions occurred within the first year postoperatively (49% for ORIF, 52% for THA). In propensity score-matched analysis, there was no difference between RFS on KM analysis ( P = 0.22).
No difference was observed in medium-term RFS between acute THA and ORIF for elderly acetabular fractures in California. Revision surgeries for either conversion or revision THA were relatively common in both groups, with roughly half of all revisions occurring within the first year postoperatively.
III.
老年人髋臼骨折的治疗较为复杂,切开复位内固定(ORIF)后行全髋关节置换术(THA)的转化率较高,但急性 THA 后并发症的潜在风险更高。
2010 年至 2017 年,加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划和发展办公室数据库检索所有年龄在 60 岁及以上的闭合性、孤立性髋臼骨折患者,这些患者接受了 ORIF、THA 或两者联合治疗。采用卡方检验和学生 t 检验比较两组之间的人口统计学差异。采用多变量回归分析评估 30 天再入院和 90 天并发症的预测因素。采用 Kaplan-Meier(KM)生存分析和 Cox 比例风险模型估计无翻修手术的生存率(无翻修生存率[RFS]),翻修手术定义为转换 THA、翻修 ORIF 或转换 THA。
共纳入 2184 例老年髋臼骨折患者,其中 1637 例(75.0%)接受 ORIF 治疗,547 例(25.0%)接受 THA 治疗,其中部分患者同时接受 ORIF 治疗。中位随访时间为 295 天(四分位间距 13 至 1720 天)。ORIF 后 99.4%的翻修是为了进行关节置换。未调整的 KM 分析显示 ORIF 和 THA 之间的 RFS 无差异(对数秩检验 P=0.27)。ORIF 患者的 RFS 分别为术后 6、12、24 和 60 个月时的 95.1%、85.8%、78.3%和 71.4%。THA 患者的 RFS 分别为术后 6、12、24 和 60 个月时的 91.6%、88.9%、87.2%和 78.8%。大约 50%的翻修发生在术后 1 年内(ORIF 为 49%,THA 为 52%)。在倾向评分匹配分析中,KM 分析的 RFS 无差异( P=0.22)。
在加利福尼亚州,对于老年髋臼骨折患者,急性 THA 与 ORIF 治疗的中期 RFS 无差异。两组患者中,无论是转换 THA 还是再翻修 THA,翻修手术都比较常见,大约一半的翻修手术发生在术后 1 年内。
III。