• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可解释机器学习方法预测预填骨料混凝土的强度

Forecasting the strength of preplaced aggregate concrete using interpretable machine learning approaches.

作者信息

Javed Muhammad Faisal, Fawad Muhammad, Lodhi Rida, Najeh Taoufik, Gamil Yaser

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Swabi, 23640, Pakistan.

Silesian University of Technology Poland, Gliwice, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;14(1):8381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57896-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-57896-0
PMID:38600161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11006863/
Abstract

Preplaced aggregate concrete (PAC) also known as two-stage concrete (TSC) is widely used in construction engineering for various applications. To produce PAC, a mixture of Portland cement, sand, and admixtures is injected into a mold subsequent to the deposition of coarse aggregate. This process complicates the prediction of compressive strength (CS), demanding thorough investigation. Consequently, the emphasis of this study is on enhancing the comprehension of PAC compressive strength using machine learning models. Thirteen models are evaluated with 261 data points and eleven input variables. The result depicts that xgboost demonstrates exceptional accuracy with a correlation coefficient of 0.9791 and a normalized coefficient of determination (R) of 0.9583. Moreover, Gradient boosting (GB) and Cat boost (CB) also perform well due to its robust performance. In addition, Adaboost, Voting regressor, and Random forest yield precise predictions with low mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) values. The sensitivity analysis (SA) reveals the significant impact of key input parameters on overall model sensitivity. Notably, gravel takes the lead with a substantial 44.7% contribution, followed by sand at 19.5%, cement at 15.6%, and Fly ash and GGBS at 5.9% and 5.1%, respectively. The best fit model i.e., XG-Boost model, was employed for SHAP analysis to assess the relative importance of contributing attributes and optimize input variables. The SHAP analysis unveiled the water-to-binder (W/B) ratio, superplasticizer, and gravel as the most significant factors influencing the CS of PAC. Furthermore, graphical user interface (GUI) have been developed for practical applications in predicting concrete strength. This simplifies the process and offers a valuable tool for leveraging the model's potential in the field of civil engineering. This comprehensive evaluation provides valuable insights to researchers and practitioners, empowering them to make informed choices in predicting PAC compressive strength in construction projects. By enhancing the reliability and applicability of predictive models, this study contributes to the field of preplaced aggregate concrete strength prediction.

摘要

预填集料混凝土(PAC)也称为两阶段混凝土(TSC),在建筑工程中有广泛的应用。为了生产PAC,在粗集料沉积之后,将波特兰水泥、沙子和外加剂的混合物注入模具中。这个过程使得抗压强度(CS)的预测变得复杂,需要进行深入研究。因此,本研究的重点是使用机器学习模型来提高对PAC抗压强度的理解。使用261个数据点和11个输入变量对13个模型进行了评估。结果表明,XGBoost表现出卓越的准确性,相关系数为0.9791,归一化决定系数(R)为0.9583。此外,梯度提升(GB)和Catboost(CB)由于其强大的性能也表现良好。此外,Adaboost、投票回归器和随机森林以低平均绝对误差(MAE)和均方根误差(RMSE)值产生精确的预测。敏感性分析(SA)揭示了关键输入参数对整体模型敏感性的重大影响。值得注意的是,砾石的贡献最大,为44.7%,其次是沙子,为19.5%,水泥为15.6%,粉煤灰和粒化高炉矿渣分别为5.9%和5.1%。采用最佳拟合模型即XG-Boost模型进行SHAP分析,以评估贡献属性的相对重要性并优化输入变量。SHAP分析揭示了水胶比(W/B)、高效减水剂和砾石是影响PAC抗压强度的最重要因素。此外,还开发了图形用户界面(GUI)用于预测混凝土强度的实际应用。这简化了过程,并为在土木工程领域利用该模型的潜力提供了一个有价值的工具。这种全面的评估为研究人员和从业者提供了有价值的见解,使他们能够在建筑项目中预测PAC抗压强度时做出明智的选择。通过提高预测模型的可靠性和适用性,本研究为预填集料混凝土强度预测领域做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/4eb6aa872e53/41598_2024_57896_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/9aee21ed2cc3/41598_2024_57896_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/1f7bf67155de/41598_2024_57896_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/6e3e2ee7645a/41598_2024_57896_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/d998f393bb58/41598_2024_57896_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/1191af1b1ce0/41598_2024_57896_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/02df61eb974f/41598_2024_57896_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/d9f6bcfd58c0/41598_2024_57896_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/8f2456f8d684/41598_2024_57896_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/de378375e39e/41598_2024_57896_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/697eeeaad9fd/41598_2024_57896_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/a565e3720c75/41598_2024_57896_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/8525b8dd6417/41598_2024_57896_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/71a49d0bc7c2/41598_2024_57896_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/e08e504ebaad/41598_2024_57896_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/f748cce34a6c/41598_2024_57896_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/bb89557b9873/41598_2024_57896_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/e12f94340b71/41598_2024_57896_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/aa3b7612c8a2/41598_2024_57896_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/91bc548e44ea/41598_2024_57896_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/4eb6aa872e53/41598_2024_57896_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/9aee21ed2cc3/41598_2024_57896_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/1f7bf67155de/41598_2024_57896_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/6e3e2ee7645a/41598_2024_57896_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/d998f393bb58/41598_2024_57896_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/1191af1b1ce0/41598_2024_57896_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/02df61eb974f/41598_2024_57896_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/d9f6bcfd58c0/41598_2024_57896_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/8f2456f8d684/41598_2024_57896_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/de378375e39e/41598_2024_57896_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/697eeeaad9fd/41598_2024_57896_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/a565e3720c75/41598_2024_57896_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/8525b8dd6417/41598_2024_57896_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/71a49d0bc7c2/41598_2024_57896_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/e08e504ebaad/41598_2024_57896_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/f748cce34a6c/41598_2024_57896_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/bb89557b9873/41598_2024_57896_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/e12f94340b71/41598_2024_57896_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/aa3b7612c8a2/41598_2024_57896_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/91bc548e44ea/41598_2024_57896_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bf0/11006863/4eb6aa872e53/41598_2024_57896_Fig20_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Forecasting the strength of preplaced aggregate concrete using interpretable machine learning approaches.使用可解释机器学习方法预测预填骨料混凝土的强度
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;14(1):8381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57896-0.
2
Application of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods to Estimate the Compressive Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Nano-Silica Modified Concrete.集成机器学习方法在估算纤维增强纳米二氧化硅改性混凝土抗压强度中的应用
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;14(18):3906. doi: 10.3390/polym14183906.
3
Machine learning and interactive GUI for concrete compressive strength prediction.用于混凝土抗压强度预测的机器学习与交互式图形用户界面
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66957-3.
4
Comparison of Prediction Models Based on Machine Learning for the Compressive Strength Estimation of Recycled Aggregate Concrete.基于机器学习的再生骨料混凝土抗压强度估计预测模型比较
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 10;15(10):3430. doi: 10.3390/ma15103430.
5
Use of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Parameters of Sustainable Concrete and Raw Ingredient Effects and Interactions.利用人工智能预测可持续混凝土的参数以及原材料的影响和相互作用。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;15(15):5207. doi: 10.3390/ma15155207.
6
Compressive Strength Evaluation of Ultra-High-Strength Concrete by Machine Learning.基于机器学习的超高强混凝土抗压强度评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 13;15(10):3523. doi: 10.3390/ma15103523.
7
Estimation of compressive strength of waste concrete utilizing fly ash/slag in concrete with interpretable approaches: optimization and graphical user interface (GUI).采用可解释方法利用混凝土中的粉煤灰/矿渣估算废弃混凝土抗压强度:优化与图形用户界面(GUI)
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 26;14(1):4598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54513-y.
8
Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Concrete at High Temperature.用于预测高温下混凝土抗压强度的监督式机器学习算法的比较研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;14(15):4222. doi: 10.3390/ma14154222.
9
Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate the Compressive Property of High Strength Fiber Reinforced Concrete.使用机器学习算法估算高强度纤维增强混凝土的抗压性能。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 24;15(13):4450. doi: 10.3390/ma15134450.
10
Predicting the Compressive Strength of Sustainable Portland Cement-Fly Ash Mortar Using Explainable Boosting Machine Learning Techniques.使用可解释的机器学习技术预测可持续波特兰水泥-粉煤灰砂浆的抗压强度。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;17(19):4744. doi: 10.3390/ma17194744.

引用本文的文献

1
Presenting a model for estimating the cube compressive strength of self-compacting concrete in cast in-situ piles using GEP.提出一种使用基因表达式编程(GEP)估算灌注桩中自密实混凝土立方体抗压强度的模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 28;14(1):25842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75608-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting compressive strength of eco-friendly plastic sand paver blocks using gene expression and artificial intelligence programming.利用基因表达和人工智能编程预测环保型塑料砂铺地砖的抗压强度。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39349-2.
2
Evaluating the effectiveness of waste glass powder for the compressive strength improvement of cement mortar using experimental and machine learning methods.采用实验和机器学习方法评估废玻璃粉对水泥砂浆抗压强度提升的有效性。
Heliyon. 2023 May 13;9(5):e16288. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16288. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Prediction of Compressive Strength of Fly Ash Based Concrete Using Individual and Ensemble Algorithm.
基于个体和集成算法的粉煤灰基混凝土抗压强度预测
Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 8;14(4):794. doi: 10.3390/ma14040794.
4
CatBoost for big data: an interdisciplinary review.用于大数据的CatBoost:跨学科综述
J Big Data. 2020;7(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40537-020-00369-8. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
5
Prediction of mechanical properties of green concrete incorporating waste foundry sand based on gene expression programming.基于基因表达编程的废弃铸造砂再生混凝土力学性能预测。
J Hazard Mater. 2020 Feb 15;384:121322. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121322. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
6
Univariate and multivariate skewness and kurtosis for measuring nonnormality: Prevalence, influence and estimation.单变量和多变量偏度和峰度测量非正态性:流行率、影响和估计。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1716-1735. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0814-1.
7
An overview of statistical learning theory.统计学习理论概述。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1999;10(5):988-99. doi: 10.1109/72.788640.
8
Joint analysis of two microarray gene-expression data sets to select lung adenocarcinoma marker genes.联合分析两个微阵列基因表达数据集以选择肺腺癌标记基因。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 24;5:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-81.
9
Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.随机森林:一种用于化合物分类和定量构效关系建模的分类与回归工具。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003 Nov-Dec;43(6):1947-58. doi: 10.1021/ci034160g.