• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于混凝土抗压强度预测的机器学习与交互式图形用户界面

Machine learning and interactive GUI for concrete compressive strength prediction.

作者信息

Elshaarawy Mohamed Kamel, Alsaadawi Mostafa M, Hamed Abdelrahman Kamal

机构信息

Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Horus University-Egypt, New Damietta, 34517, Egypt.

Structural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66957-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-66957-3
PMID:39030283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11271522/
Abstract

Concrete compressive strength (CS) is a crucial performance parameter in concrete structure design. Reliable strength prediction reduces costs and time in design and prevents material waste from extensive mixture trials. Machine learning techniques solve structural engineering challenges such as CS prediction. This study used Machine Learning (ML) models to enhance the prediction of CS, analyzing 1030 experimental CS data ranging from 2.33 to 82.60 MPa from previous research databases. The ML models included both non-ensemble and ensemble types. The non-ensemble models were regression-based, evolutionary, neural network, and fuzzy-inference-system. Meanwhile, the ensemble models consisted of adaptive boosting, random forest, and gradient boosting. There were eight input parameters: cement, blast-furnace-slag, aggregates (coarse and fine), fly ash, water, superplasticizer, and curing days, with the CS as the output. Comprehensive performance evaluations include visual and quantitative methods and k-fold cross-validation to assess the study's reliability and accuracy. A sensitivity analysis using Shapley-Additive-exPlanations (SHAP) was conducted to understand better how each input variable affects CS. The findings showed that the Categorical-Gradient-Boosting (CatBoost) model was the most accurate prediction during the testing stage. It had the highest determination-coefficient (R) of 0.966 and the lowest Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE) of 3.06 MPa. The SHAP analysis showed that the age of the concrete was the most critical factor in the predictive accuracy. Finally, a Graphical User Interface (GUI) was offered for designers to predict concrete CS quickly and economically instead of costly computational or experimental tests.

摘要

混凝土抗压强度(CS)是混凝土结构设计中的一个关键性能参数。可靠的强度预测可降低设计成本和时间,并避免因大量配合比试验导致的材料浪费。机器学习技术可解决诸如CS预测等结构工程挑战。本研究使用机器学习(ML)模型来改进CS预测,分析了来自先前研究数据库的1030个抗压强度实验数据,范围为2.33至82.60MPa。ML模型包括非集成和集成类型。非集成模型基于回归、进化、神经网络和模糊推理系统。同时,集成模型由自适应增强、随机森林和梯度增强组成。有八个输入参数:水泥、高炉矿渣、骨料(粗骨料和细骨料)、粉煤灰、水、高效减水剂和养护天数,以CS作为输出。综合性能评估包括可视化和定量方法以及k折交叉验证,以评估研究的可靠性和准确性。使用Shapley-Additive-exPlanations(SHAP)进行敏感性分析,以更好地了解每个输入变量如何影响CS。结果表明,分类梯度增强(CatBoost)模型在测试阶段的预测最为准确。它具有最高的决定系数(R)为0.966和最低的均方根误差(RMSE)为3.06MPa。SHAP分析表明,混凝土龄期是预测准确性的最关键因素。最后,为设计人员提供了一个图形用户界面(GUI),以便他们能够快速且经济地预测混凝土CS,而无需进行成本高昂的计算或实验测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/790f7bd37867/41598_2024_66957_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/035b5e3083f7/41598_2024_66957_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/7a41ad6a69e3/41598_2024_66957_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/794a0473f41e/41598_2024_66957_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/e5f03a81e041/41598_2024_66957_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/899e86c27da2/41598_2024_66957_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/5c689b7364a4/41598_2024_66957_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/2cb98fbffb61/41598_2024_66957_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/03eb4601e5c6/41598_2024_66957_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/ff7d0b9a748b/41598_2024_66957_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/02cb5f572041/41598_2024_66957_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/f5fb6892360d/41598_2024_66957_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/418b10cc26ed/41598_2024_66957_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/99c1630da260/41598_2024_66957_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/92a298909b33/41598_2024_66957_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/48938bd07670/41598_2024_66957_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/80e3432ea341/41598_2024_66957_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/790f7bd37867/41598_2024_66957_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/035b5e3083f7/41598_2024_66957_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/7a41ad6a69e3/41598_2024_66957_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/794a0473f41e/41598_2024_66957_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/e5f03a81e041/41598_2024_66957_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/899e86c27da2/41598_2024_66957_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/5c689b7364a4/41598_2024_66957_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/2cb98fbffb61/41598_2024_66957_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/03eb4601e5c6/41598_2024_66957_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/ff7d0b9a748b/41598_2024_66957_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/02cb5f572041/41598_2024_66957_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/f5fb6892360d/41598_2024_66957_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/418b10cc26ed/41598_2024_66957_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/99c1630da260/41598_2024_66957_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/92a298909b33/41598_2024_66957_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/48938bd07670/41598_2024_66957_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/80e3432ea341/41598_2024_66957_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/11271522/790f7bd37867/41598_2024_66957_Fig17_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning and interactive GUI for concrete compressive strength prediction.用于混凝土抗压强度预测的机器学习与交互式图形用户界面
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66957-3.
2
Application of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods to Estimate the Compressive Strength of Fiber-Reinforced Nano-Silica Modified Concrete.集成机器学习方法在估算纤维增强纳米二氧化硅改性混凝土抗压强度中的应用
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;14(18):3906. doi: 10.3390/polym14183906.
3
Forecasting the strength of preplaced aggregate concrete using interpretable machine learning approaches.使用可解释机器学习方法预测预填骨料混凝土的强度
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;14(1):8381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57896-0.
4
Prediction of Ecofriendly Concrete Compressive Strength Using Gradient Boosting Regression Tree Combined with GridSearchCV Hyperparameter-Optimization Techniques.结合网格搜索交叉验证超参数优化技术的梯度提升回归树用于预测生态友好型混凝土抗压强度
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 23;15(21):7432. doi: 10.3390/ma15217432.
5
In-Depth Analysis of Cement-Based Material Incorporating Metakaolin Using Individual and Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches.使用个体和集成机器学习方法对掺偏高岭土的水泥基材料进行深入分析
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;15(21):7764. doi: 10.3390/ma15217764.
6
Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Concrete at High Temperature.用于预测高温下混凝土抗压强度的监督式机器学习算法的比较研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;14(15):4222. doi: 10.3390/ma14154222.
7
Prediction of Geopolymer Concrete Compressive Strength Using Novel Machine Learning Algorithms.使用新型机器学习算法预测地质聚合物混凝土抗压强度
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 2;13(19):3389. doi: 10.3390/polym13193389.
8
Predicting the Compressive Strength of the Cement-Fly Ash-Slag Ternary Concrete Using the Firefly Algorithm (FA) and Random Forest (RF) Hybrid Machine-Learning Method.使用萤火虫算法(FA)和随机森林(RF)混合机器学习方法预测水泥-粉煤灰-矿渣三元混凝土的抗压强度
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 13;15(12):4193. doi: 10.3390/ma15124193.
9
Prediction of Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Ensemble and Non-Ensemble Machine-Learning Techniques.使用集成和非集成机器学习技术预测粉煤灰/矿渣基地质聚合物混凝土的力学性能
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 12;15(10):3478. doi: 10.3390/ma15103478.
10
Compressive Strength Estimation of Steel-Fiber-Reinforced Concrete and Raw Material Interactions Using Advanced Algorithms.使用先进算法对钢纤维混凝土抗压强度进行估算及原材料相互作用研究
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;14(15):3065. doi: 10.3390/polym14153065.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Numerical and Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Concrete Properties: From Fresh to Long-Term.预测混凝土性能的数值和机器学习方法综述:从新拌状态到长期性能
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;18(15):3718. doi: 10.3390/ma18153718.
2
Compressive strength modelling of cenosphere and copper slag-based geopolymer concrete using deep learning model.基于深度学习模型的漂珠和铜渣基地质聚合物混凝土抗压强度建模
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13176-z.
3
An interpretable deep learning model for the accurate prediction of mean fragmentation size in blasting operations.

本文引用的文献

1
Unboxing machine learning models for concrete strength prediction using XAI.使用可解释人工智能(XAI)开启用于混凝土强度预测的机器学习模型
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 14;13(1):19892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47169-7.
2
Prediction of soil salinity in the Upputeru river estuary catchment, India, using machine learning techniques.利用机器学习技术预测印度乌普特鲁河口集水区的土壤盐度。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jul 28;195(8):1006. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11613-y.
3
Research on prediction of compressive strength of fly ash and slag mixed concrete based on machine learning.
一种用于精确预测爆破作业中平均破碎粒度的可解释深度学习模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96005-7.
4
Prediction of ultimate strength and strain in FRP wrapped oval shaped concrete columns using machine learning.基于机器学习的纤维增强复合材料(FRP)包裹椭圆形混凝土柱极限强度和应变预测
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 28;15(1):10724. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95272-8.
5
Predicting the compressive strength of polymer-infused bricks: A machine learning approach with SHAP interpretability.预测聚合物注入砖的抗压强度:一种具有SHAP可解释性的机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):8090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89606-9.
基于机器学习的粉煤灰和矿渣混合混凝土抗压强度预测研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 27;17(12):e0279293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279293. eCollection 2022.
4
Predicting the Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash Using ANN and GEP Models.使用人工神经网络(ANN)和基因表达式编程(GEP)模型预测含粉煤灰和稻壳灰混凝土的抗压强度
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;15(21):7713. doi: 10.3390/ma15217713.
5
Predicting the Compressive Strength of the Cement-Fly Ash-Slag Ternary Concrete Using the Firefly Algorithm (FA) and Random Forest (RF) Hybrid Machine-Learning Method.使用萤火虫算法(FA)和随机森林(RF)混合机器学习方法预测水泥-粉煤灰-矿渣三元混凝土的抗压强度
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 13;15(12):4193. doi: 10.3390/ma15124193.
6
High-Performance Concrete Strength Prediction Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的高性能混凝土强度预测
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 28;2022:5802217. doi: 10.1155/2022/5802217. eCollection 2022.
7
Granite Powder vs. Fly Ash for the Sustainable Production of Air-Cured Cementitious Mortars.用于气硬性水泥砂浆可持续生产的花岗岩粉与粉煤灰对比
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 4;14(5):1208. doi: 10.3390/ma14051208.
8
Prediction of Compressive Strength of Fly Ash Based Concrete Using Individual and Ensemble Algorithm.基于个体和集成算法的粉煤灰基混凝土抗压强度预测
Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 8;14(4):794. doi: 10.3390/ma14040794.
9
Mechanical properties of concrete containing a high volume of tire-rubber particles.含有大量轮胎橡胶颗粒的混凝土的力学性能
Waste Manag. 2008 Dec;28(12):2472-82. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 Mar 26.