• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护人员对糖尿病预防项目转诊及招募的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项系统评价方案

Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Haseldine Clair, O'Donoghue Gráinne, Kearney Patricia M, Riordan Fiona, Cotterill Sarah, McHugh Sheena

机构信息

School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2024 Mar 28;6:23. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13702.2. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13702.2
PMID:38601792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11004599/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a growing global health problem. International guidelines recommend identification, screening, and referral to behavioural programmes for those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Diabetes prevention programmes (DPPs) can prevent type 2 diabetes in those at high risk, however many eligible participants are not referred to these programmes. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are pivotal to the referral and recruitment processes. This study aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to DPPs from the perspective of HCWs.

METHODS

A "best fit" framework synthesis method will synthesise qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods evidence on factors that affect HCWs referral and recruitment to DPPs, with the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the framework. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched for primary studies published in English. Year of publication will be restricted to the last 26 years (1997-2023). Quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A mix of deductive coding using the TDF and inductive coding of data that does not fit the TDF will be synthesised into themes representing the whole dataset. The relationships between the final set of themes will be explored to create a new model to understand HCWs' perspectives on referral and recruitment to DPPs. Sensitivity analysis will be carried out on this conceptual model. Confidence in the synthesised findings will be assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. One author will screen, extract, appraise the literature while a second author will independently verify a 20% sample at each stage.

DISCUSSION

Participation in DPPs is key for programme impact. HCWs typically identify those at risk and refer them to DPPs. Understanding HCWs' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment will inform future implementation of DPPs.

摘要

背景

糖尿病是一个日益严重的全球健康问题。国际指南建议对有发展为2型糖尿病高风险的人群进行识别、筛查,并转介至行为干预项目。糖尿病预防项目(DPPs)可以预防高风险人群患2型糖尿病,然而许多符合条件的参与者并未被转介至这些项目。医护人员(HCWs)在转介和招募过程中起着关键作用。本研究旨在从医护人员的角度识别、评估和综合关于糖尿病预防项目转介和招募的障碍及促进因素的证据。

方法

采用“最佳匹配”框架综合法,以理论领域框架(TDF)为框架,综合定性、定量和混合方法的证据来分析影响医护人员将患者转介至糖尿病预防项目并招募其参与的因素。将检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、Web of Science和Scopus数据库,查找以英文发表的原始研究。发表年份限制在过去26年(1997 - 2023年)。将使用混合方法评估工具进行质量评估。将使用TDF进行的演绎编码与不符合TDF的数据的归纳编码相结合,归纳为代表整个数据集的主题。将探索最终主题集之间的关系,以创建一个新模型,来理解医护人员对糖尿病预防项目转介和招募的看法。将对这个概念模型进行敏感性分析。将使用GRADE - CERQual方法评估综合研究结果的可信度。由一位作者进行文献筛选、提取和评估,另一位作者将在每个阶段独立核实20%的样本。

讨论

参与糖尿病预防项目对于项目成效至关重要。医护人员通常负责识别有风险的人群并将他们转介至糖尿病预防项目。了解医护人员对转介和招募的障碍及促进因素的看法,将为未来糖尿病预防项目的实施提供参考。

相似文献

1
Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review protocol.医护人员对糖尿病预防项目转诊及招募的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项系统评价方案
HRB Open Res. 2024 Mar 28;6:23. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13702.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员遵守呼吸道传染病感染预防与控制(IPC)指南的障碍与促进因素:一项快速定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD013582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013582.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of menu labelling interventions to support healthy food choices: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.菜单标签干预措施实施的障碍和促进因素,以支持健康食物选择:一项混合方法系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 23;7(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0752-3.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
A qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) exploring the barriers and facilitators to screening in emergency departments using the theoretical domains framework.一项使用理论领域框架探索急诊科筛查障碍和促进因素的定性证据综合研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):1090. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10027-3.
7
Communication partner training with familiar partners of people with aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of barriers and facilitators to implementation.与失语症患者熟悉伙伴的沟通伙伴培训:实施障碍与促进因素的系统评价与综合分析
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Mar;58(2):601-628. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12805. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of osteoarthritis management programmes in primary or community care settings: a systematic review and qualitative framework synthesis protocol.在初级或社区护理环境中实施骨关节炎管理项目的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述和定性框架综合方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 Sep 17;4:102. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13377.1. eCollection 2021.
9
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare workers' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to referral to type 2 diabetes prevention programmes: a systematic review.医护人员对转诊至2型糖尿病预防项目的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 7;15(3):e090105. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090105.
2
Exploring Determinants of Effective Implementation of an Innovation Within Health Care: Qualitative Insights from Program Champions on Implementing One-at-a-Time Therapy Within Addictions and Mental Health Services in New Brunswick.探索医疗保健领域创新有效实施的决定因素:项目倡导者对新不伦瑞克省成瘾与心理健康服务中一次性治疗实施情况的定性见解
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Nov 23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01423-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Inner and outer setting factors that influence the implementation of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): a qualitative study.运用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)探讨影响国家糖尿病预防计划(National DPP)实施的内部和外部环境因素:一项定性研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 1;3(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00350-x.
2
How do UK general practice staff understand and manage prediabetes? A focus group study.英国全科医疗工作人员如何理解和管理糖尿病前期?一项焦点小组研究。
BJGP Open. 2022 Aug 30;6(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0166. Print 2022 Jun.
3
The English national health service diabetes prevention programme (NHS DPP): A scoping review of existing evidence.英国国家医疗服务体系糖尿病预防计划(NHS DPP):现有证据的范围综述。
Diabet Med. 2022 Jul;39(7):e14855. doi: 10.1111/dme.14855. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
Risks and burdens of incident diabetes in long COVID: a cohort study.长期新冠患者新发糖尿病的风险与负担:一项队列研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 May;10(5):311-321. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00044-4. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Facilitators and barriers for lifestyle change in people with prediabetes: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.糖尿病前期人群生活方式改变的促进因素和障碍:定性研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 21;22(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12885-8.
6
Prevalence, Deaths and Disability-Adjusted-Life-Years (DALYs) Due to Type 2 Diabetes and Its Attributable Risk Factors in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2019: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2019 年全球疾病负担研究:1990 年至 2019 年 204 个国家和地区 2 型糖尿病及其归因风险因素的患病率、死亡率和伤残调整生命年(DALYs)。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 25;13:838027. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.838027. eCollection 2022.
7
Delivering the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Assessment of Enrollment in In-Person and Virtual Organizations.开展国家糖尿病预防计划:评估线下和线上组织的参与情况。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 Feb 1;2022:2942918. doi: 10.1155/2022/2942918. eCollection 2022.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.为初级保健提供者缩写。
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Jan;39(1):14-43. doi: 10.2337/cd21-as01.
10
Prediabetes and What It Means: The Epidemiological Evidence.糖尿病前期及其意义:流行病学证据。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:59-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102644. Epub 2021 Dec 23.