Ayer Miller Vanessa, Marks Timothy, Thompson Dorothea K
Department of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, South College School of Pharmacy, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2025 Apr 24;26(1):e0020324. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00203-24. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
Interest in virtual laboratory simulations as a pedagogical tool continues to grow, given the advantages of flexibility, scalability, technology integration, and interactive visualizations. We developed a laboratory model that integrates virtual lab simulations (VLS) and traditional in-person (IP) lab experiences for targeted skill development. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of VLS versus IP labs in the promotion of procedural, conceptual, and critical thinking levels of understanding. A second research objective was to explore students' perceptions in using VLS compared to IP labs in an undergraduate microbiology course. Study participants comprised students ( = 49) enrolled in a foundational microbiology course at a private university in the Fall semesters of 2022 and 2023. Identical quizzes were administered to assess learning performance of students who received the VLS first and those who completed the IP lab first. Focus group discussions were conducted, and participant responses were audio recorded for accuracy purposes, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using open and axial coding. The results indicated differences in performance scores between the VLS and IP groups were not statistically significant, suggesting both lab modalities are effective in enhancing learning. Overall, students expressed positive perceptions of VLS, noting detailed explanations, repetition, time management, and visual learning as primary benefits. Furthermore, students indicated an interest in using VLS in a hybrid structure as either a pre-laboratory exercise or a supplemental lab. These findings support the utility of a hybrid laboratory model in a foundational microbiology course for training pre-clinical students.
鉴于虚拟实验室模拟在灵活性、可扩展性、技术整合和交互式可视化方面的优势,其作为一种教学工具的受关注程度持续上升。我们开发了一种实验室模式,将虚拟实验室模拟(VLS)与传统的面对面(IP)实验室体验相结合,以实现有针对性的技能培养。在本研究中,我们旨在比较VLS实验室与IP实验室在促进程序理解、概念理解和批判性思维理解水平方面的有效性。第二个研究目标是探讨在本科微生物学课程中,与IP实验室相比,学生使用VLS的看法。研究参与者包括在2022年和2023年秋季学期就读于一所私立大学基础微生物学课程的学生(n = 49)。对首先接受VLS的学生和首先完成IP实验室的学生进行了相同的测验,以评估他们的学习表现。进行了焦点小组讨论,并为确保准确性对参与者的回答进行了录音、转录,并使用开放式编码和轴心式编码进行了主题分析。结果表明,VLS组和IP组之间的成绩差异没有统计学意义,这表明两种实验室模式在促进学习方面都是有效的。总体而言,学生对VLS表达了积极的看法,指出详细的解释、重复、时间管理和视觉学习是主要优点。此外,学生表示有兴趣在混合结构中使用VLS,作为课前实验练习或补充实验。这些发现支持了混合实验室模式在基础微生物学课程中对临床前学生培训的实用性。