Suppr超能文献

欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会肺量计标准和种族中性方程在 COPDGene 研究中的应用。

Application of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Spirometry Standards and Race-Neutral Equations in the COPDGene Study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Channing Division of Network Medicine and.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec 1;210(11):1317-1328. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2145OC.

Abstract

For spirometry interpretation, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommend using -scores, and the ATS has recommended using Global Lung Initiative (GLI) "Global" race-neutral reference equations. However, these recommendations have been variably implemented, and the impact has not been widely assessed in clinical or research settings. To evaluate the ERS/ATS classification of airflow obstruction severity. In COPDGene (Genetic Epidemiology of COPD Study) ( = 10,108), airflow obstruction has been defined by an FEV/FVC ratio <0.70, with spirometric severity graded from class 1 to class 4 based on race-specific percent predicted (pp) FEV cutoff points as recommended by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). We compared the GOLD approach, using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III race-specific equations, versus the application of GLI Global equations using the ERS/ATS definition of airflow obstruction as an FEV/FVC ratio below the lower limit of normal and z-score-based FEV cutoff points of -1.645, -2.5, and -4 ("zGLI Global"). We tested the four-tier severity scheme for association with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes. The lowest agreement between ERS/ATS with zGLI Global and the GOLD classification was observed in individuals with milder disease (56.9% and 42.5% in GOLD stages 1 and 2, respectively), and race was a major determinant of redistribution. After adjustment for relevant covariates, zGLI Global distinguished all-cause mortality risk between normal spirometry and the first grade of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.44;  = 0.014) and showed a linear increase in exacerbation rates with increasing disease severity in comparison with GOLD. The zGLI Global severity classification outperformed the GOLD criteria in the discrimination of survival, exacerbations, and imaging characteristics.

摘要

对于肺量计解读,欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)和美国胸科学会(ATS)建议使用 Z 评分,ATS 建议使用全球肺倡议(GLI)“全球”不分种族的参考方程。然而,这些建议的实施情况各不相同,其在临床或研究环境中的影响尚未得到广泛评估。

评估 ERS/ATS 气流阻塞严重程度分类。在 COPDGene(COPD 遗传流行病学研究)( = 10108)中,气流阻塞通过 FEV/FVC 比值<0.70 定义,根据全球倡议慢性阻塞性肺疾病(GOLD)建议的种族特异性预测值(pp)FEV 截断点,将肺量计严重程度从 1 级到 4 级分级。我们比较了 GOLD 方法,使用国家健康和营养检查调查 III 种族特异性方程,与使用 ERS/ATS 气流阻塞定义(FEV/FVC 比值低于正常值下限和基于 z 分数的 FEV 截断点-1.645、-2.5 和-4 的 zGLI 全球)的 GLI 全球方程的应用。我们测试了四级严重程度方案与慢性阻塞性肺疾病结局的关联。

在疾病较轻的个体中,ERS/ATS 与 zGLI Global 之间的最低一致性观察到(GOLD 1 期和 2 期分别为 56.9%和 42.5%),种族是再分配的主要决定因素。在调整相关协变量后,zGLI Global 区分了正常肺量计和慢性阻塞性肺疾病 1 级之间的全因死亡率风险(风险比,1.23;95%置信区间,1.04-1.44; = 0.014),并且与 GOLD 相比,随着疾病严重程度的增加,恶化率呈线性增加。与 GOLD 标准相比,zGLI Global 严重程度分类在生存、恶化和影像学特征的区分方面表现更好。

相似文献

2
Changes in Spirometry Interpretative Strategies: Implications for Classifying COPD and Predicting Exacerbations.
Chest. 2024 Aug;166(2):294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.034. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
5
Effects of Adoption of Race-Neutral Predictive Equations on Spirometry Results in Children With Sickle Cell Disease.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2025 Aug;72(8):e31825. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31825. Epub 2025 May 27.
6
Prevalence of Bronchodilator Responsiveness: A Comparison of Old Versus New Criteria.
Respir Care. 2024 Sep 26;69(10):1266-1274. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11603.
7
Phenotypes and Trajectories of Tobacco-exposed Persons with Preserved Spirometry: Insights from Lung Volumes.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Apr;22(4):494-505. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202405-527OC.
8
Self-management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub4.
9
Comparison of Race-Neutral versus Race-Specific Spirometry Equations for Evaluation of Child Asthma.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):464-476. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202407-1288OC.
10
Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Evidence From the NHANES III and 2007-2012.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Jan 30;20:217-229. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S497634. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular and Functional Consequences of Lung Function Impairment in Northern Thai Agricultural Workers.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;22(8):1168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081168.
5
Race-Neutral -Score Classification of Airflow Obstruction: A Measured Step Forward.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec 1;210(11):1287-1289. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202404-0873ED.

本文引用的文献

1
Early Evidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Obscured by Race-Specific Prediction Equations.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;209(1):59-69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0444OC.
2
FEV/FVC Severity Stages for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 15;208(6):676-684. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0450OC.
3
Race-Specific Interpretation of Spirometry: Impact on the Lung Allocation Score.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Oct;20(10):1408-1415. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202212-1004OC.
4
Use of the Spirometric "Fixed-Ratio" Underdiagnoses COPD in African-Americans in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(13):2988-2997. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08185-5. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Race and Ethnicity in Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation: An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 15;207(8):978-995. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202302-0310ST.
6
Implications of the new ERS/ATS standards on the interpretation of lung function tests.
Eur Respir J. 2023 Mar 16;61(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02348-2022. Print 2023 Mar.
7
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 1;207(7):819-837. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202301-0106PP.
8
Spirometry in 2022: Is a Single Set of Prediction Equations for All the Best Path Forward?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 15;207(6):659-661. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202211-2181ED.
9
A Race-neutral Approach to the Interpretation of Lung Function Measurements.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 15;207(6):768-774. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202205-0963OC.
10
ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests.
Eur Respir J. 2022 Jul 13;60(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01499-2021. Print 2022 Jul.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验