Choi Joon Young, Rhee Chin Kook, Jo Yong Suk, Khor Yet Hong
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04653-6.
Pulmonary function interpretation is key to the diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) introduced the race-specific reference equations for spirometry in 2012, with subsequent development of the race-neutral reference equations in 2022. This study examined the effects of transitioning from the race-specific 2012-GLI to the race-neutral 2022-GLI reference equations on spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asians. Spirometric data of 10,030 adults from the KoGES cohort were used to derive percent-predicted values using both GLI reference equations. The prevalence of lung function impairment and medical disability, associations of FEV and FVC percent-predicted with respiratory symptoms, and lung function trajectories were determined. Agreement between the two GLI reference equations for lung function impairment and medical disability classification were moderate to almost perfect. The use of the race-neutral 2022-GLI reference equations reclassified 48.9% and 39.9% of patients as having normal lung physiology or less severe medical disability. Associations between lower FEV₁ percent-predicted and worsening respiratory symptoms remained consistent across both reference equations. However, there was more rapid longitudinal decline in FEV (p < 0.001) and FVC (p < 0.001) using the race-neutral reference equations, compared to race-specific reference equations. The shift to race-neutral 2022 GLI reference equations reduces the prevalence of lung function impairment and medical disability classifications with different rates of lung function decline in Northeast Asians, despite consistent relationships with respiratory symptoms. Caution is needed when switching pulmonary function interpretation approaches, in particular the differential effects across race and ethnicity.
肺功能解读是呼吸系统疾病诊断和管理的关键。全球肺功能倡议(GLI)于2012年推出了针对肺活量测定的种族特异性参考方程,并于2022年随后开发了种族中性参考方程。本研究探讨了从种族特异性的2012-GLI参考方程过渡到种族中性的2022-GLI参考方程对东北亚人肺活量测定解读的影响。来自KoGES队列的10030名成年人的肺活量测定数据被用于使用两个GLI参考方程得出预测值百分比。确定了肺功能损害和医疗残疾的患病率、FEV和FVC预测值百分比与呼吸道症状的关联以及肺功能轨迹。两个GLI参考方程在肺功能损害和医疗残疾分类方面的一致性从中度到几乎完美。使用种族中性的2022-GLI参考方程将48.9%和39.9%的患者重新分类为具有正常肺生理或较轻的医疗残疾。在两个参考方程中,预测的较低FEV₁与呼吸道症状恶化之间的关联保持一致。然而,与种族特异性参考方程相比,使用种族中性参考方程时FEV(p < 0.001)和FVC(p < 0.001)的纵向下降更快。转向种族中性的2022 GLI参考方程降低了东北亚人肺功能损害和医疗残疾分类的患病率,尽管肺功能下降率不同,但与呼吸道症状的关系一致。在切换肺功能解读方法时需要谨慎,特别是不同种族和民族之间的差异影响。