• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2004 年至 2017 年,65 岁及以上同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划(Medicare)和仅参加医疗保险的受益人的死亡率和住院率。

Mortality and Hospitalizations for Dually Enrolled and Nondually Enrolled Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older, 2004 to 2017.

机构信息

Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA. 2020 Mar 10;323(10):961-969. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1021.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.1021
PMID:32154858
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7064881/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Medicare beneficiaries who are also enrolled in Medicaid (dually enrolled beneficiaries) have drawn the attention of policy makers because they comprise the poorest subset of the Medicare population; however, it is unclear how their outcomes have changed over time compared with those only enrolled in Medicare (nondually enrolled beneficiaries).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate annual changes in all-cause mortality, hospitalization rates, and hospitalization-related mortality among dually enrolled beneficiaries and nondually enrolled beneficiaries.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Serial cross-sectional study of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older between January 2004 and December 2017. The final date of follow-up was September 30, 2018.

EXPOSURES

Dual vs nondual enrollment status.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Annual all-cause mortality rates; all-cause hospitalization rates; and in-hospital, 30-day, 1-year hospitalization-related mortality rates.

RESULTS

There were 71 017 608 unique Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older (mean age, 75.6 [SD, 9.2] years; 54.9% female) enrolled in Medicare for at least 1 month from 2004 through 2017. Of these beneficiaries, 11 697 900 (16.5%) were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid for at least 1 month. After adjusting for age, sex, and race, annual all-cause mortality rates declined from 8.5% (95% CI, 8.45%-8.56%) in 2004 to 8.1% (95% CI, 8.05%-8.13%) in 2017 among dually enrolled beneficiaries and from 4.1% (95% CI, 4.08%-4.13%) in 2004 to 3.8% (95% CI, 3.76%-3.79%) in 2017 among nondually enrolled beneficiaries. The difference in annual all-cause mortality between dually and nondually enrolled beneficiaries increased between 2004 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.09 [95% CI, 2.08-2.10]) and 2017 (adjusted odds ratio, 2.22 [95% CI, 2.21-2.23]) (P < .001 for interaction between dual enrollment status and time). All-cause hospitalizations per 100 000 beneficiary-years declined from 49 888 in 2004 to 41 121 in 2017 among dually enrolled beneficiaries (P < .001) and from 29 000 in 2004 to 22 601 in 2017 among nondually enrolled beneficiaries (P < .001); however, the difference between these groups widened between 2004 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.71-1.73]) and 2017 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.82-1.83]) (P < .001 for interaction). Among hospitalized beneficiaries, the risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rates declined from 10.3% (95% CI, 10.22%-10.33%) in 2004 to 10.1% (95% CI, 10.02%-10.20%) in 2017 among dually enrolled beneficiaries and from 8.5% (95% CI, 8.50%-8.56%) in 2004 to 8.1% (95% CI, 8.06%-8.13%) in 2017 among nondually enrolled beneficiaries. In contrast, 1-year mortality increased among hospitalized beneficiaries from 23.1% (95% CI, 23.05%-23.20%) in 2004 to 26.7% (95% CI, 26.58%-26.84%) in 2017 among dually enrolled beneficiaries and from 18.1% (95% CI, 18.11%-18.17%) in 2004 to 20.3% (95% CI, 20.21%-20.31%) in 2017 among nondually enrolled beneficiaries. The difference in hospitalization-related outcomes between dually and nondually enrolled beneficiaries persisted during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older, dually enrolled beneficiaries had higher annual all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, and hospitalization-related mortality compared with nondually enrolled beneficiaries. Between 2004 and 2017, these differences did not decrease.

摘要

重要性

同时参加医疗保险(双重参保受益人的 Medicare 受保人)和医疗补助计划的 Medicare 受保人引起了政策制定者的关注,因为他们构成了 Medicare 人群中最贫困的一部分;然而,目前尚不清楚与仅参加 Medicare(非双重参保受益人的 Medicare 受保人)的受保人相比,他们的预后在过去几年中是如何变化的。

目的

评估双重参保受益人和非双重参保受益人在全因死亡率、住院率和与住院相关的死亡率方面的年度变化。

设计、地点和参与者:2004 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间 Medicare 按服务收费计划中年龄在 65 岁或以上的 Medicare 受益人的一系列横断面研究。最后随访日期为 2018 年 9 月 30 日。

暴露

双重与非双重参保状况。

主要结局和测量

全因死亡率年度比率;全因住院率;以及住院、30 天、1 年与住院相关的死亡率。

结果

2004 年至 2017 年期间,有 71017608 名年龄在 65 岁或以上的 Medicare 受益人为 Medicare 至少有 1 个月的服务(平均年龄为 75.6[SD,9.2]岁;54.9%为女性)。其中,11697900(16.5%)的受益人至少有 1 个月同时参加了 Medicare 和医疗补助计划。在调整年龄、性别和种族后,2004 年至 2017 年期间,双重参保受益人的全因死亡率从 8.5%(95%CI,8.45%-8.56%)降至 8.1%(95%CI,8.05%-8.13%),而非双重参保受益人的全因死亡率从 4.1%(95%CI,4.08%-4.13%)降至 3.8%(95%CI,3.76%-3.79%)。2004 年(调整后的优势比,2.09[95%CI,2.08-2.10])和 2017 年(调整后的优势比,2.22[95%CI,2.21-2.23])之间,双重和非双重参保受益人的全因死亡率差异均有所增加(P<0.001,双重参保状况与时间的交互作用)。2004 年至 2017 年期间,双重参保受益人的每 100000 名受益人的全因住院人数从 49888 降至 41121(P<0.001),而非双重参保受益人的全因住院人数从 29000 降至 22601(P<0.001);然而,2004 年(调整后的风险比,1.72[95%CI,1.71-1.73])和 2017 年(调整后的风险比,1.83[95%CI,1.82-1.83])之间,这两组之间的差异有所扩大(P<0.001,双重参保状况与时间的交互作用)。在住院受益人中,30 天的风险调整死亡率从 2004 年的 10.3%(95%CI,10.22%-10.33%)降至 2017 年的 10.1%(95%CI,10.02%-10.20%),而非双重参保受益人的死亡率从 2004 年的 8.5%(95%CI,8.50%-8.56%)降至 2017 年的 8.1%(95%CI,8.06%-8.13%)。相比之下,2004 年至 2017 年期间,住院受益人的 1 年死亡率从 23.1%(95%CI,23.05%-23.20%)上升至 26.7%(95%CI,26.58%-26.84%),而非双重参保受益人的死亡率从 18.1%(95%CI,18.11%-18.17%)上升至 20.3%(95%CI,20.21%-20.31%)。2004 年至 2017 年期间,住院相关结局的双重和非双重参保受益人的差异持续存在。

结论和相关性

在 65 岁或以上的 Medicare 按服务收费计划的受益人中,双重参保受益人的全因死亡率、全因住院率和与住院相关的死亡率均高于非双重参保受益人的 Medicare 受保人。2004 年至 2017 年期间,这些差异并未缩小。

相似文献

1
Mortality and Hospitalizations for Dually Enrolled and Nondually Enrolled Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older, 2004 to 2017.2004 年至 2017 年,65 岁及以上同时参加医疗保险和医疗补助计划(Medicare)和仅参加医疗保险的受益人的死亡率和住院率。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 10;323(10):961-969. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1021.
2
Mortality, Hospitalizations, and Expenditures for the Medicare Population Aged 65 Years or Older, 1999-2013.1999 - 2013年65岁及以上医疗保险人群的死亡率、住院率和费用支出
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):355-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8035.
3
Spending differences associated with the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration.与 Medicare 医师团体执业示范项目相关的支出差异。
JAMA. 2012 Sep 12;308(10):1015-23. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.10812.
4
Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.1999 - 2014年美国医疗保险人群中的颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1035-1046. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12882.
5
Trends in 10-Year Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Who Survived an Acute Myocardial Infarction.在急性心肌梗死存活的 Medicare 受益人中,10 年结局的趋势。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jun 1;7(6):613-622. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0662.
6
Association of Diagnosis Coding With Differences in Risk-Adjusted Short-term Mortality Between Critical Access and Non-Critical Access Hospitals.诊断编码与危急症救治医院和非危急症救治医院之间风险调整短期死亡率差异的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 4;324(5):481-487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.9935.
7
Association Between Treatment by Fraud and Abuse Perpetrators and Health Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.欺诈和滥用药行为者的治疗与医疗保险受益人健康结果之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jan 1;180(1):62-69. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4771.
8
Disabled Medicare beneficiaries by dual eligible status: California, 1996-2001.按双重资格状态划分的残疾医疗保险受益人:加利福尼亚州,1996 - 2001年
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Summer;28(4):57-67.
9
National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Acute Hypertension Among Medicare Beneficiaries (1999-2019).医保受益人群中急性高血压住院治疗的全国趋势和差异(1999-2019 年)。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 23;144(21):1683-1693. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057056. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
10
Twenty-Year Trends in Outcomes for Older Adults With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States.美国老年人急性心肌梗死 20 年转归趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1938.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Medicare's Chronic Condition Files and Disparities in Dementia Identification.医疗保险慢性病档案的变化与痴呆症识别方面的差异。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Sep 3:105857. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105857.
2
Ambulatory care for individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.为同时符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的个人提供的门诊护理。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 31;3(8):qxaf148. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf148. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Frequent seizure and epilepsy-related emergency department visits in the United States: A retrospective cohort study.美国频繁癫痫发作及与癫痫相关的急诊科就诊情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1111/epi.18525.
4
Incidence, Prevalence, and Trends in Mortality and Stroke Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation: 2013 to 2019.2013年至2019年医疗保险受益人心房颤动患者的发病率、患病率、死亡率及中风趋势
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 May;18(5):e011365. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011365. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
5
Social Vulnerability and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes After COVID-19 Hospitalization: An Analysis of the American Heart Association COVID-19 Registry Linked With Medicare Claims Data.新冠病毒感染住院后的社会脆弱性与长期心血管结局:一项对与医疗保险理赔数据相关联的美国心脏协会新冠病毒感染登记处的分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr;14(7):e038073. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038073. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
6
Growth Of Chronic Condition Special Needs Plans Among Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries, 2011-24.2011 - 2024年双重资格受益人群中慢性病特殊需求计划的发展情况
Health Aff (Millwood). 2025 Mar;44(3):304-312. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00651.
7
Cardiovascular Hospitalizations Among Older Adults in the US and Denmark.美国和丹麦老年人的心血管住院情况。
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 1;10(4):351-358. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.5303.
8
Association between governmental spending on social services and health care use among low-income older adults.政府社会服务支出与低收入老年人医疗保健使用之间的关联。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 10;3(1):qxae181. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae181. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Race and Ethnicity, Neighborhood Social Deprivation and Medicare Home Health Agency Quality for Persons Living With Serious Illness.种族与族裔、社区社会剥夺与重症患者的医疗保险家庭健康机构质量
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 27:10499091251316309. doi: 10.1177/10499091251316309.
10
THE ROLE OF HEALTH POLICY IN IMPROVING HEALTH OUTCOMES AND HEALTH EQUITY.卫生政策在改善健康结果和健康公平中的作用。
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2024;134:200-213.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study.美国医院获得性条件减少计划实施处罚后医院安全状况的变化:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 3;366:l4109. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4109.
2
Assessment of Strategies for Managing Expansion of Diagnosis Coding Using Risk-Adjustment Methods for Medicare Data.使用风险调整方法对医疗保险数据管理诊断编码扩展策略的评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1287-1290. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1005.
3
The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program - Time for a Reboot.医院再入院率降低计划——是时候重启了。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2289-2291. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1901225. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
Association of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities With Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia: An Analysis of Within- and Between-Hospital Variation.种族和社会经济差异与急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭和肺炎住院患者结局的关联:医院内和医院间变异的分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2044.
5
Characteristics And Spending Patterns Of Persistently High-Cost Medicare Patients.持续性高额医保患者的特征和支出模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):107-114. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05160.
6
Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, and Pneumonia.医院再入院率降低计划与医疗保险受益人因心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死和肺炎住院的死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 25;320(24):2542-2552. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19232.
7
Persistence and Drivers of High-Cost Status Among Dual-Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries: An Observational Study.双重资格的医疗保险和医疗补助受益人中高成本状况的持续存在及其驱动因素:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 16;169(8):528-534. doi: 10.7326/M18-0085. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
8
Financial Incentives and Vulnerable Populations - Will Alternative Payment Models Help or Hurt?经济激励与弱势群体——替代支付模式是福是祸?
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 15;378(11):977-979. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1715455.
9
The Value-Based Payment Modifier: Program Outcomes and Implications for Disparities.基于价值的支付调整因子:项目结果及其对差异的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):255-265. doi: 10.7326/M17-1740. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
10
Association of Practice-Level Social and Medical Risk With Performance in the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program.医疗保险医师价值导向支付调整计划中实践层面社会和医疗风险与绩效的关联
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):453-461. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9643.