• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症患者的最佳血糖目标:一项更新的网状Meta分析。

The optimal glycemic target in critically ill patients: an updated network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tanaka Aiko, Yatabe Tomoaki, Suhara Tomohiro, Egi Moritoki

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, University of Fukui Hospital, 23-3 Matsuoka Shimoaizuki, Eiheiji-Cho, Yoshida, Fukui, 910-1193, Japan.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2024 Apr 14;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00728-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40560-024-00728-0
PMID:38616264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11017653/
Abstract

Acute glycemic control significantly affects the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. This updated network meta-analysis examines the benefits and harms of four target blood glucose levels (< 110, 110-144, 144-180, and > 180 mg/dL). Analyzing data of 27,541 patients from 37 trials, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve for mortality and hypoglycemia was highest at a target blood glucose level of 144-180 mg/dL, while for infection and acute kidney injury at 110-144 mg/dL. Further evidence is needed to determine whether 110-144 or 144-180 mg/dL is superior as an optimal glucose target, considering prioritized outcomes.

摘要

急性血糖控制显著影响危重症患者的临床结局。这项更新的网状荟萃分析探讨了四个目标血糖水平(<110、110 - 144、144 - 180和>180mg/dL)的利弊。分析来自37项试验的27541例患者的数据,死亡率和低血糖累积排名曲线下面积在目标血糖水平为144 - 180mg/dL时最高,而感染和急性肾损伤在110 - 144mg/dL时最高。考虑到优先结局,需要进一步的证据来确定110 - 144mg/dL还是144 - 180mg/dL作为最佳血糖目标更具优势。

相似文献

1
The optimal glycemic target in critically ill patients: an updated network meta-analysis.危重症患者的最佳血糖目标:一项更新的网状Meta分析。
J Intensive Care. 2024 Apr 14;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00728-0.
2
The optimal target for acute glycemic control in critically ill patients: a network meta-analysis.危重症患者急性血糖控制的最佳目标:网状荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):16-28. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4558-2. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
3
Glycemic control, mortality, and hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.危重症患者的血糖控制、死亡率和低血糖:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4523-0. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
4
Glycemic control in acute illness.急性疾病中的血糖控制。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Dec;70(6):591-595. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.6.591. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
5
Glycemic control in critically ill patients with or without diabetes.危重症患者合并或不合并糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 16;22(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01769-4.
6
Glycemic control in critically ill patients.危重症患者的血糖控制
World J Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb 4;1(1):31-9. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v1.i1.31.
7
[The optimal blood glucose target in critically ill patient: comparison of two intensive insulin therapy protocols].[重症患者的最佳血糖目标:两种强化胰岛素治疗方案的比较]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Mar 4;142(5):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2012.11.032. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Individualizing Glycemic Control in the Critically Ill.危重症患者的血糖控制个体化
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2020 Jan/Mar;43(1):14-27. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000288.
9
Poor glycemic control is associated with increased mortality in critically ill trauma patients.血糖控制不佳与重症创伤患者死亡率增加相关。
Am Surg. 2007 May;73(5):454-60. doi: 10.1177/000313480707300507.
10
Diabetic status and the relation of the three domains of glycemic control to mortality in critically ill patients: an international multicenter cohort study.糖尿病状态及血糖控制的三个领域与危重症患者死亡率的关系:一项国际多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 1;17(2):R37. doi: 10.1186/cc12547.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of comorbidities on the prognosis of patients with septic arthritis.合并症对脓毒性关节炎患者预后的影响。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 18;12:1567229. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1567229. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing palliative care practices in intensive care units and interpreting them using the lens of appropriate care concepts. An umbrella review.评估重症监护病房的姑息治疗实践,并使用适当护理概念的视角来解释这些实践。一项伞式综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep;50(9):1438-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07565-7. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Tight Blood-Glucose Control without Early Parenteral Nutrition in the ICU.重症监护病房内不早期给予肠外营养的严格血糖控制。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Sep 28;389(13):1180-1190. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304855.
2
The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020).《2020年日本脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理临床实践指南》(J-SSCG 2020)
J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 25;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00555-7.
3
ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit.ESPEN 重症监护病房临床营养指南。
Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):48-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
4
The optimal target for acute glycemic control in critically ill patients: a network meta-analysis.危重症患者急性血糖控制的最佳目标:网状荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):16-28. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4558-2. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Dysglycaemia in the critically ill and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality.危重症患者的血糖异常和慢性与急性血糖交互作用与死亡率的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):973-80. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3287-7. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
6
The interaction of chronic and acute glycemia with mortality in critically ill patients with diabetes.慢性和急性血糖与糖尿病危重症患者死亡率的相互作用。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):105-11. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feb5ea.
7
Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.危重症患者强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810625. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
8
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU.医学重症监护病房中的强化胰岛素治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 2;354(5):449-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052521.
9
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.危重症患者的强化胰岛素治疗
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1359-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011300.