• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测死亡率和住院入院情况的急诊护理数据集(ECDS)呈现代码的价值

The Value of Emergency Care Data Set (ECDS) Presentation Codes for Predicting Mortality and Inpatient Admission.

作者信息

Teresa Betsy, Subhi Mohammed, Boyle Adrian, Kark Wayne

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, GBR.

General Practice, Staploe Medical Centre, Cambridge, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 13;16(3):e56083. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56083. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.56083
PMID:38618345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11011239/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early identification of patients at higher risk of death and hospital admission is an important problem in Emergency Departments (ED). Most triage scales were developed before current electronic healthcare records were developed. The implementation of a national Emergency Care Data Set (ECDS) allows for the standardised recording of presenting complaints and the use of Electronic Patient Records (EPR) offers the potential for automated triage. The mortality risk and need for hospital admission associated with the different presenting complaints in a standardised national data set has not been previously reported. This study aimed to quantify the risks of death and hospitalisation from presenting complaints. This would be valuable in developing automated triage tools and decision support software.

METHODS

We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study on patients who visited a single ED in 2021. The presenting complaints related to subsequent attendances were excluded. This patient list was then manually matched with a routinely collected list of deaths. All deaths that occurred within 30 days of attendance were included.

RESULTS

Data was collected from 84,999 patients, of which 1,159 people died within 30 days of attendance. The mortality rate was the highest in cardiac arrest [32 (78.1%)], cardiac arrest due to trauma [2(50%)] and respiratory arrest [3(50%)]. Drowsy [17(12%)], hypothermia [3(13%)] and cyanosis [1(10%)] were also high-risk categories. Chest pain [34(0.6%)] was not a high-risk presenting complaint.

CONCLUSION

The initial presenting complaint in ECDS may be useful to identify people at higher and lower risk of death. This information is useful for building automated triage models.

摘要

背景

早期识别死亡和住院风险较高的患者是急诊科的一个重要问题。大多数分诊量表是在当前电子健康记录出现之前制定的。国家急诊护理数据集(ECDS)的实施允许对就诊主诉进行标准化记录,而电子病历(EPR)的使用为自动分诊提供了可能性。此前尚未有关于标准化国家数据集中不同就诊主诉相关的死亡风险和住院需求的报道。本研究旨在量化就诊主诉导致的死亡和住院风险。这对于开发自动分诊工具和决策支持软件将具有重要价值。

方法

我们对2021年就诊于单一急诊科的患者进行了一项观察性回顾性队列研究。排除与后续就诊相关的就诊主诉。然后将该患者名单与常规收集的死亡名单进行人工匹配。纳入所有在就诊后30天内发生的死亡病例。

结果

收集了84999名患者的数据,其中1159人在就诊后30天内死亡。心脏骤停[32例(78.1%)]、创伤性心脏骤停[2例(50%)]和呼吸骤停[3例(50%)]的死亡率最高。嗜睡[17例(12%)]、体温过低[3例(13%)]和发绀[1例(10%)]也是高风险类别。胸痛[34例(0.6%)]并非高风险就诊主诉。

结论

ECDS中的初始就诊主诉可能有助于识别死亡风险较高和较低的人群。该信息对于构建自动分诊模型很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11011239/fd6fdf47ee36/cureus-0016-00000056083-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11011239/94e4442df018/cureus-0016-00000056083-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11011239/fd6fdf47ee36/cureus-0016-00000056083-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11011239/94e4442df018/cureus-0016-00000056083-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470d/11011239/fd6fdf47ee36/cureus-0016-00000056083-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
The Value of Emergency Care Data Set (ECDS) Presentation Codes for Predicting Mortality and Inpatient Admission.用于预测死亡率和住院入院情况的急诊护理数据集(ECDS)呈现代码的价值
Cureus. 2024 Mar 13;16(3):e56083. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56083. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
3
Who is less likely to die in association with improved National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) compliance for emergency admissions in a tertiary referral hospital?在一家三级转诊医院中,哪些人因改善国家紧急入院准入目标(NEAT)合规性而死亡的可能性较低?
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Apr;40(2):149-154. doi: 10.1071/AH14242.
4
[Standardized collection of presenting complaints in the emergency room : Integration of coded presenting complaints into the electronic medical record system of an emergency department and their value for health care research].[急诊室现存主诉的标准化收集:将编码后的现存主诉整合到急诊科电子病历系统及其对医疗保健研究的价值]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Mar;113(2):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s00063-017-0286-9. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
5
Elderly patients with non-specific complaints at the emergency department have a high risk for admission and 30-days mortality.急诊科有非特异性主诉的老年患者有较高的住院风险和 30 天死亡率。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04621-7.
6
National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and 3-level triage scale as risk predictors in frail older adults in the emergency department.国家早期预警评分 2 版(NEWS2)和 3 级分诊量表在急诊科虚弱老年人中的风险预测作用。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 28;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00379-y.
7
Novel model for predicting inpatient mortality after emergency admission to hospital in Singapore: retrospective observational study.新加坡急诊住院患者死亡的预测新模型:回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e031382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031382.
8
Prognostic accuracy of emergency department triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19: the PRIEST observational cohort study.成人疑似 COVID-19 患者的急诊科分诊工具的预后准确性:PRIEST 观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Aug;38(8):587-593. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210783. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
Mortality risk for different presenting complaints amongst older patients assessed with the Manchester triage system.不同主诉的老年患者使用曼彻斯特分诊系统评估的死亡率风险。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Apr;13(2):323-328. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00568-3. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Identifying the Sickest During Triage: Using Point-of-Care Severity Scores to Predict Prognosis in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Sepsis.在分诊中识别最病重的患者:使用床边严重程度评分预测疑似脓毒症的急诊科患者的预后。
J Hosp Med. 2021 Aug;16(8):453-461. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3642.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of digital early warning score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study.数字早期预警评分(NEWS2)在心脏专科环境中的表现:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 13;13(3):e066131. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066131.
2
Investigation into the predictive capability for mortality and the trigger points of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) in emergency department patients.调查国家早期预警评分 2(NEWS2)在急诊科患者中的死亡率预测能力和触发点。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Sep;39(9):685-690. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210190. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Machine learning-based models to support decision-making in emergency department triage for patients with suspected cardiovascular disease.
基于机器学习的模型在急诊科分诊疑似心血管疾病患者中的决策支持。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jan;145:104326. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104326. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Diagnosis and risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department: focus on acute coronary syndromes. A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association.急诊科胸痛患者的诊断和风险分层:重点关注急性冠状动脉综合征。急性心血管护理协会的立场文件。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Feb;9(1):76-89. doi: 10.1177/2048872619885346. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
5
Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.分诊系统在急诊护理中的应用效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e026471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471.
6
Combination of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and inflammatory biomarkers for early risk stratification in emergency department patients: results of a multinational, observational study.国家早期预警评分(NEWS)与炎症生物标志物联合用于急诊科患者的早期风险分层:一项多中心观察性研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024636.
7
Triage Performance in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review.急诊医学分诊性能:系统评价。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;74(1):140-152. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
Decision support system for triage management: A hybrid approach using rule-based reasoning and fuzzy logic.分诊管理决策支持系统:基于规则推理和模糊逻辑的混合方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jun;114:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
9
A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester Triage System.关于急诊科分诊量表——曼彻斯特分诊系统的有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jul;51(7):1062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
10
Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients.急诊拥挤对住院患者结局的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):605-611.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Dec 6.