Lacy-Nichols Jennifer, Nandi Sulakshana, Mialon Melissa, McCambridge Jim, Lee Kelley, Jones Alexandra, Gilmore Anna B, Galea Sandro, de Lacy-Vawdon Cassandra, de Carvalho Camila Maranha Paes, Baum Fran, Moodie Rob
Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Public Health Resource Network, Chhattisgarh, India; People's Health Movement, New Delhi, India.
Lancet. 2023 Apr 8;401(10383):1214-1228. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00012-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Most public health research on the commercial determinants of health (CDOH) to date has focused on a narrow segment of commercial actors. These actors are generally the transnational corporations producing so-called unhealthy commodities such as tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed foods. Furthermore, as public health researchers, we often discuss the CDOH using sweeping terms such as private sector, industry, or business that lump together diverse entities whose only shared characteristic is their engagement in commerce. The absence of clear frameworks for differentiating among commercial entities, and for understanding how they might promote or harm health, hinders the governance of commercial interests in public health. Moving forward, it is necessary to develop a nuanced understanding of commercial entities that goes beyond this narrow focus, enabling the consideration of a fuller range of commercial entities and the features that characterise and distinguish them. In this paper, which is the second of three papers in a Series on commercial determinants of health, we develop a framework that enables meaningful distinctions among diverse commercial entities through consideration of their practices, portfolios, resources, organisation, and transparency. The framework that we develop permits fuller consideration of whether, how, and to what extent a commercial actor might influence health outcomes. We discuss possible applications for decision making about engagement; managing and mitigating conflicts of interest; investment and divestment; monitoring; and further research on the CDOH. Improved differentiation among commercial actors strengthens the capacity of practitioners, advocates, academics, regulators, and policy makers to make decisions about, to better understand, and to respond to the CDOH through research, engagement, disengagement, regulation, and strategic opposition.
迄今为止,大多数关于健康的商业决定因素(CDOH)的公共卫生研究都集中在一小部分商业行为主体上。这些行为主体通常是生产烟草、酒精和超加工食品等所谓不健康商品的跨国公司。此外,作为公共卫生研究人员,我们在讨论CDOH时,经常使用一些笼统的术语,如私营部门、行业或企业,这些术语将各种不同的实体归为一类,它们唯一的共同特征就是从事商业活动。缺乏区分商业实体的明确框架,以及理解它们如何促进或损害健康,阻碍了公共卫生领域商业利益的治理。展望未来,有必要对商业实体形成更细致入微的理解,超越这种狭隘的关注范围,以便能够考虑更广泛的商业实体及其特征和区别特征。在本文中,这是关于健康的商业决定因素系列三篇论文中的第二篇,我们开发了一个框架,通过考虑不同商业实体的实践、业务组合、资源、组织和透明度,实现有意义的区分。我们开发的框架允许更全面地考虑商业行为主体是否、如何以及在多大程度上可能影响健康结果。我们讨论了在参与决策、管理和缓解利益冲突、投资和撤资、监测以及对CDOH的进一步研究方面的可能应用。改善商业行为主体之间的区分,增强了从业者、倡导者、学者、监管者和政策制定者通过研究、参与、脱离、监管和战略反对来就CDOH做出决策、更好地理解并做出回应的能力。