Suppr超能文献

“浪潮”:通过一个(尤其)有争议的隐喻将新冠疫情概念化为一个事件。

The "Waves:" Conceptualizing Covid-19 as an Event Through One (Particularly) Contested Metaphor.

作者信息

Rekenthaler Nick

机构信息

New York University, Department of Sociology.

出版信息

Poetics (Amst). 2023 Jun 27:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101808.

Abstract

This paper bridges scholarship on events with that on metaphors, positing metaphors as a proxy for competing "forms of eventfulness." Focusing specifically on the "wave" metaphor, I draw from 471 Governor's Covid-19 Briefing transcripts across ten governors-five Democratic, five Republican-from the year 2020 to identify two competing forms of eventfulness with respect to the Covid-19 pandemic. As I show, using both discourse analytic techniques and simple text counts, Democratic governors take up the "wave" metaphor to present what I call "cascading" eventfulness, defined by multiple conditional moments of rupture, or "waves." In contrast, Republican governors largely avoid the "wave" metaphor to present what I call "calamitous" eventfulness, defined by a singular, decisive moment of rupture. I conclude with a discussion of how my findings contribute to scholarship on eventfulness and political ideology.

摘要

本文搭建了关于事件的学术研究与关于隐喻的学术研究之间的桥梁,将隐喻视为相互竞争的“事件性形式”的替代物。具体聚焦于“浪潮”隐喻,我从2020年十位州长(五位民主党人、五位共和党人)的471份州长新冠疫情简报记录中取材,以确定在新冠疫情方面两种相互竞争的事件性形式。如我所示,通过运用话语分析技巧和简单的文本计数,民主党州长采用“浪潮”隐喻来呈现我所谓的“层叠式”事件性,其定义为多个有条件的破裂时刻,即“浪潮”。相比之下,共和党州长在很大程度上避免使用“浪潮”隐喻,以呈现我所谓的“灾难性”事件性,其定义为一个单一、决定性的破裂时刻。最后,我讨论了我的研究结果如何为关于事件性和政治意识形态的学术研究做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b052/10293899/97f8e9184dcd/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验