Castro Seixas Eunice
Research Centre in Economic and Organizational Sociology (SOCIUS), Research in Social Sciences and Management (CSG), Lisbon School of Economics and Management (ISEG), University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Front Sociol. 2021 Jan 25;5:583680. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.583680. eCollection 2020.
Although militaristic metaphors have been pervasive during health crisis in political and science communication, few works have examined how these linguistic devices may influence crisis communication. Drawing on critical discourse analysis (CDA) and on crisis communication literature, I show how political representatives have used the war metaphor for very different purposes in terms of crisis communication and management of the current Covid-19 pandemic. I suggest that these findings challenge previous criticisms of the war metaphor as inherently negative and damaging. Finally, I discuss possibilities of using CDA, and specifically, metaphor analysis to inform and expand crisis communication.
尽管在政治和科学传播的健康危机期间,军国主义隐喻一直很普遍,但很少有作品研究这些语言手段如何影响危机传播。借鉴批判性话语分析(CDA)和危机传播文献,我展示了政治代表们在当前新冠疫情的危机传播和管理方面,如何出于截然不同的目的使用战争隐喻。我认为这些发现挑战了以往将战争隐喻视为本质上具有负面性和破坏性的批评。最后,我讨论了使用CDA,特别是隐喻分析来为危机传播提供信息并加以扩展的可能性。