• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛肠造口旁疝修补术:腹腔镜和机器人手术方法的系统评价。

End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

机构信息

General and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Salerno Medical School", San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Campus di Baronissi (SA), "Gaetano Fucito" Facility, Mercato San Severino (SA), Salerno, Italy.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):723-743. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03026-8. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03026-8
PMID:38625435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11249463/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common and challenging complication after stoma creation, with an estimated 50% incidence 2 years after the index surgery. Mesh repair is the treatment of choice. Laparoscopic and/or robotic approaches allow acceptable outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review from January 2012 to November 2023 was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Embase, PubMed, and Scopus search were performed to select articles dealing with minimally invasive surgical treatment for PSH after end colostomy.

RESULTS

603 studies were found, and 24 were chosen. When compared to open surgery, laparoscopy showed decreased postoperative complications and recurrence. The main laparoscopic approaches are the keyhole (KH), the Sugarbaker (SB), and the sandwich technique. Continuous improvement in surgery, mesh technology, and surgeons' expertise led to an amelioration of surgical outcome and recurrence rate after repair. Recent studies showed comparable outcomes for SB and KH techniques, while novel surgical approaches have been proposed in an attempt to further increase the operative and long-term results. Reports on PSH robotic repairs are scarce and describe small series results, suggesting a role of the initial learning curve as a risk factor for complications.

CONCLUSION

End-colostomy PSH surgical repair still represents a challenge for surgeons. Recent evidence has not shown a significant advantage in postoperative complications and recurrence with a specific repair among SB, KH, and sandwich technique. The paucity of data on robotic surgery does not allow to draw definitive conclusion. Further primary, multicentric, and larger cohort studies are needed.

摘要

简介

造口旁疝(PSH)是造口术后最常见且极具挑战性的并发症,估计在指数手术后 2 年内的发生率为 50%。网片修补是首选治疗方法。腹腔镜和/或机器人方法可获得可接受的结果。

材料与方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,对 2012 年 1 月至 2023 年 11 月的文献进行了系统综述。对 Embase、PubMed 和 Scopus 进行了检索,以选择涉及经乙状结肠造口术后微创治疗 PSH 的文章。

结果

共发现 603 篇研究,选择了 24 篇。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜显示术后并发症和复发减少。主要的腹腔镜方法是小孔(KH)、Sugarbaker(SB)和三明治技术。手术、网片技术和外科医生专业技能的不断改进,导致修复后手术结果和复发率的改善。最近的研究表明 SB 和 KH 技术的结果相当,而新的手术方法已被提出,试图进一步提高手术和长期结果。关于 PSH 机器人修复的报道很少,仅描述了小系列结果,表明初始学习曲线作为并发症的一个危险因素。

结论

乙状结肠造口旁疝的外科修复仍然是外科医生面临的挑战。最近的证据表明,在 SB、KH 和三明治技术之间,特定修复方法在术后并发症和复发方面没有显著优势。机器人手术的数据很少,无法得出明确的结论。需要进一步进行初级、多中心和更大队列的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d6e/11249463/5f7cf6f15d5b/10029_2024_3026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d6e/11249463/5f7cf6f15d5b/10029_2024_3026_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d6e/11249463/5f7cf6f15d5b/10029_2024_3026_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.经肛肠造口旁疝修补术:腹腔镜和机器人手术方法的系统评价。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):723-743. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03026-8. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的现状:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28;21(28):8670-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670.
3
Sandwich parastomal hernia repair, a prospective observational study.三明治式造口旁疝修补术,一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Hernia. 2025 Jun 21;29(1):211. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03335-6.
4
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
5
Prophylactic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Following End Colostomy: an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.预防性补片在预防结肠造口术后旁疝中的应用:一项随机对照试验的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Feb;26(2):486-502. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05174-z. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
7
Management and outcomes profiles of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.根治性膀胱切除术和回肠代膀胱术后造口旁疝的管理及预后概况:一项系统评价
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03359-y.
8
Use of prophylactic mesh during initial stoma creation to prevent parastomal herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.在初次造口时使用预防性补片预防造口旁疝:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2821-2833. doi: 10.1111/codi.15849. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
9
GORE BIO-A mesh in parastomal hernia prevention: IDEAL Stage 2a with case series.戈尔特斯生物补片预防造口旁疝:IDEAL 2a期及病例系列研究
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70160. doi: 10.1111/codi.70160.
10
The PROPHER study: patient-reported outcomes after parastomal hernia treatment-a prospective international cohort study.PROPHER 研究:造口旁疝治疗后患者报告结局的前瞻性国际队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Mar;26(3):554-563. doi: 10.1111/codi.16859. Epub 2024 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创与开放造口旁疝修补术:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2025 Sep;49(9):2382-2398. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70013. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
2
Parastomal Hernia: direct repair versus relocation: is stoma relocation worth the risk? A comparative meta-analysis and systematic review.造口旁疝:直接修复与重新定位:造口重新定位值得冒风险吗?一项比较性荟萃分析和系统评价。
Updates Surg. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02155-8.
3
Surgical Outcomes after Laparoscopic Repairs of Para-colostomy Hernia and Para-ileal-conduit Hernia: A Comparative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of recurrence and risk factors in laparoscopic sandwich technique for parastomal hernia repair.腹腔镜三明治技术修补造口旁疝的复发及危险因素分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9125-9131. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10475-2. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
2
Full endoscopic minimally invasive extraperitoneal modified Sugarbaker approach for para-colostomy hernia repair: Technical aspects and 2-year follow-up results of a prospective cohort.全内镜微创经腹膜外改良 Sugarbaker 入路修补结肠造口旁疝:前瞻性队列的技术方面和 2 年随访结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Oct;25(10):2033-2042. doi: 10.1111/codi.16734. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
腹腔镜修补结肠造口旁疝和回肠造口旁疝后的手术结果:一项对比研究。
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Oct 25;8(4):340-347. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-059. eCollection 2024.
Parastomal Hernia Repair.
造口旁疝修补术
Surg Clin North Am. 2023 Oct;103(5):993-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: Two-Year Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人与腹腔镜腹疝修补术的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、盲法随机临床试验的两年结果。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):161-165. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005903. Epub 2023 May 19.
5
Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version : Robotic parastomal hernia repair. Video report and preliminary results.机器人疝手术 IV. 英文版本:机器人造口旁疝修补术。视频报告和初步结果。
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;93(Suppl 2):129-140. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01779-5. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
6
Comparing Sugarbaker versus keyhole mesh technique for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair: study protocol for a registry-based randomized controlled trial.比较 Sugarbaker 与微创网片修补技术治疗开放式腹会阴联合切除术后造口旁疝:基于注册的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 4;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06207-x.
7
Robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic incisional hernia repair following oncologic surgery: short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜切口疝修补术在肿瘤手术后的比较:一项随机对照试验的短期和长期结果。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01403-y. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: One-year Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人与腹腔镜腹外疝修补术的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、盲法随机对照临床试验的一年结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1076-1080. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004795.
10
Endoscopic preperitoneal parastomal hernia repair (ePauli repair) : an observational study.经内镜腹膜前修补术(ePauli 修补术)治疗肠造口旁疝的观察性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1903-1907. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08192-1. Epub 2021 Jan 4.