Suppr超能文献

ICU 多专业团队间的互动模式:一种前瞻性的患者交接班层面的调查方法。

Patterns of interactions among ICU interprofessional teams: A prospective patient-shift-level survey approach.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.

School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0298586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298586. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Awakening, Breathing Coordination, Delirium monitoring and Early mobility bundle (ABCDE) is associated with lower mortality for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, efforts to improve ABCDE are variably successful, possibly due to lack of clarity about who are the team members interacting when caring for each patient, each shift. Lack of patient shift-level information regarding who is interacting with whom limits the ability to tailor interventions to the specific ICU team to improve ABCDE.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the number and types of individuals (i.e., clinicians and family members) interacting in the care of mechanically ventilated (MV) patients, as reported by the patients' assigned physician, nurse, and respiratory therapist (RT) each shift, using a network science lens.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, patient-shift-level survey in 2 medical ICUs. For each patient, we surveyed the assigned physician, nurse, and RT each day and night shift about who they interacted with when providing ABCDE for each patient-shift. We determined the number and types of interactions, reported by physicians, nurses, and RTs and day versus night shift.

RESULTS

From 1558 surveys from 404 clinicians who cared for 169 patients over 166 shifts (65% response rate), clinicians reported interacting with 2.6 individuals each shift (physicians: 2.65, nurses: 3.33, RTs: 1.86); this was fewer on night shift compared to day shift (1.99 versus 3.02). Most frequent interactions were with the bedside nurse, attending, resident, intern, and RT; family member interactions were reported in less than 1 in 5 surveys (12.2% of physician surveys, 19.7% of nurse surveys, 4.9% of RT surveys).

INTERPRETATION

Clinicians reported interacting with 3-4 clinicians each shift, and fewer on nights. Nurses interacted with the most clincians and family members. Interventions targeting shift-level teams, focusing on nurses and family members, may be a way to improve ABCDE delivery and ICU teamwork.

摘要

背景

唤醒、呼吸协调、谵妄监测和早期活动捆绑包(ABCDE)与重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率降低有关。然而,努力提高 ABCDE 的效果各不相同,这可能是由于不清楚在照顾每位患者时,每个班次的团队成员是谁。缺乏关于患者班次层面上谁与谁互动的信息,限制了根据特定 ICU 团队定制干预措施以提高 ABCDE 的能力。

目的

使用网络科学的视角,确定机械通气(MV)患者护理过程中每个班次报告的患者指定医生、护士和呼吸治疗师(RT)与多少种类型的个体(即临床医生和家属)进行互动。

方法

我们在 2 家医疗 ICU 进行了一项前瞻性、患者班次水平的调查。对于每位患者,我们在每天的白天和夜间班次询问指定的医生、护士和 RT,他们在为每位患者班次提供 ABCDE 时与谁进行了互动。我们确定了医生、护士和 RT 报告的互动次数和类型,以及白天和夜间班次的情况。

结果

从 404 名照顾 169 名患者 166 个班次的医生中获得了 1558 份调查,医生报告每个班次与 2.6 个人进行互动(医生:2.65,护士:3.33,RT:1.86);夜间班次比白天班次少(1.99 比 3.02)。最常见的互动是与床边护士、主治医生、住院医生、实习医生和 RT;不到五分之一的调查中报告了与家属的互动(医生调查的 12.2%,护士调查的 19.7%,RT 调查的 4.9%)。

解释

医生报告每个班次与 3-4 名临床医生互动,夜间班次较少。护士与最多的临床医生和家属互动。针对班次级团队的干预措施,重点关注护士和家属,可能是提高 ABCDE 实施和 ICU 团队合作的一种方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb83/11020828/f6114024b730/pone.0298586.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验