• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于跨专业重症监护病房团队中后备行为的混合方法研究。

A mixed methods study of backup behavior among interprofessional ICU teams.

作者信息

Costa Deena Kelly, Lee Kathryn A, Wright Nathan C, Boltey Emily M, Ratliff Hannah C, Marriott Deanna J, Yakusheva Olga

机构信息

Yale School of Nursing, West Haven CT, USA; Yale School of Medicine, Section on Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, New Haven CT, USA.

University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2025 May-Jun;71:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.01.012
PMID:39893857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11949697/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Backup behavior-when clinicians help each other via verbal assistance or task completion in their roles-is essential for effective teamwork in the intensive care unit (ICU) but is not well understood. Exploring how interprofessional team members provide backup may guide future interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To examine who, how often, why, and under what circumstances ICU clinicians provide backup in mechanical ventilation care.

METHODS

Using a convergence, triangulation mixed methods design in 2 medical ICUs (2017-2019), we collected qualitative data (observation, shadowing, interviews) to understand how ICU teams provide backup; and patient-shift level surveys of ICU nurses, physicians, and respiratory therapists, to identify whom clinicians contacted for help that shift. We analyzed and compared these data to gain insight into the frequency, and circumstances surrounding ICU clinicians' requests for and receipt of backup when providing mechanical ventilation care.

RESULTS

Backup behavior was common. Interprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to respiratory therapist) related to specific patient care tasks. Intraprofessional backup (e.g. nurse to nurse) involved team members 'checking in' to assist their colleague. Most (57%) survey respondents reported at least one interprofessional contact on day and night shifts, and approximately 25% reported at least one intraprofessional backup contact. We identified distinct backup behavior patterns on day and night shifts.

CONCLUSIONS

While backup behavior was common, interprofessional backup focused on care aligning with professional roles whereas intraprofessional backup entailed checking-in with team members. Examining how to enhance interprofessional backup through trainings or interventions may improve how teams work and patient care.

摘要

背景

在重症监护病房(ICU)中,当临床医生通过言语协助或完成任务来互相帮助时,这种支持行为对于有效的团队协作至关重要,但目前尚未得到充分理解。探索跨专业团队成员如何提供支持可能会为未来的干预措施提供指导。

目的

研究ICU临床医生在机械通气护理中由谁、多频繁、为何以及在何种情况下提供支持。

方法

在2个医疗ICU(2017 - 2019年)采用融合、三角测量混合方法设计,我们收集了定性数据(观察、跟班、访谈)以了解ICU团队如何提供支持;以及对ICU护士、医生和呼吸治疗师进行患者轮班水平调查,以确定临床医生在该轮班中向谁寻求帮助。我们分析并比较这些数据,以深入了解ICU临床医生在提供机械通气护理时请求和获得支持的频率及相关情况。

结果

支持行为很常见。跨专业支持(如护士对呼吸治疗师)与特定的患者护理任务相关。专业内支持(如护士对护士)涉及团队成员“询问情况”以协助同事。大多数(57%)调查受访者报告在白班和夜班至少有一次跨专业联系,约25%报告至少有一次专业内支持联系。我们确定了白班和夜班不同的支持行为模式。

结论

虽然支持行为很常见,但跨专业支持侧重于与专业角色相符的护理,而专业内支持则需要与团队成员询问情况。研究如何通过培训或干预来加强跨专业支持可能会改善团队协作和患者护理。

相似文献

1
A mixed methods study of backup behavior among interprofessional ICU teams.一项关于跨专业重症监护病房团队中后备行为的混合方法研究。
Heart Lung. 2025 May-Jun;71:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
2
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
The experiences of cardiovascular surgeons and nurses with mutual support through interprofessional collaboration in the intensive care unit.心血管外科医生和护士在重症监护病房通过跨专业协作获得相互支持的经历。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e13220. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13220. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
7
Melatonin for the promotion of sleep in adults in the intensive care unit.褪黑素用于促进重症监护病房成年患者的睡眠。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 10;5(5):CD012455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012455.pub2.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) for critically ill adults in the intensive care unit.对重症监护病房中的成年重症患者进行早期干预(活动或主动锻炼)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 27;3(3):CD010754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010754.pub2.
10
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' care coordination competence in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units: a cross-sectional study.重症监护病房中机械通气患者的护士护理协调能力:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12478-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of interactions among ICU interprofessional teams: A prospective patient-shift-level survey approach.ICU 多专业团队间的互动模式:一种前瞻性的患者交接班层面的调查方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0298586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298586. eCollection 2024.
2
Knowing your team in the intensive care unit: an ethnographic study on familiarity.了解重症监护病房中的团队:一项关于熟悉度的人种志研究。
J Interprof Care. 2024 Jul-Aug;38(4):593-601. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2329968. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Evaluating the Effect of TeamSTEPPS on Teamwork Perceptions and Patient Safety Culture among Newly Graduated Nurses.评估团队策略与工具提升绩效系统(TeamSTEPPS)对新毕业护士团队协作认知及患者安全文化的影响。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 13;23(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01850-y.
4
Identifying the unique behaviors embedded in the process of interprofessional collaboration in the ICU.识别 ICU 中跨专业协作过程中所嵌入的独特行为。
J Interprof Care. 2023 Nov 2;37(6):857-865. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2202218. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
5
Toward the Development of the Perfect Medical Team: Critical Components for Adaptation.迈向完美医疗团队的发展:适应的关键因素。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):e47-e70. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000598.
6
Teamwork in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的团队合作。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):468-477. doi: 10.1037/amp0000247.
7
Interprofessional Care and Teamwork in the ICU.重症监护病房中的跨专业护理和团队合作。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):980-990. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003067.
8
Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice.团队合作、协作、协调与网络关系:为何我们需要区分不同类型的跨专业实践。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jan;32(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Accomplishing professional jurisdiction in intensive care: An ethnographic study of three units.实现重症监护的专业管辖权:对三个单位的民族志研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;181:102-111. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.047. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
10
Balancing intertwined responsibilities: A grounded theory study of teamwork in everyday intensive care unit practice.平衡相互交织的责任:对重症监护病房日常实践中团队合作的扎根理论研究
J Interprof Care. 2017 Mar;31(2):233-244. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1255184. Epub 2017 Jan 31.