Dubowski K M
J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1985 Jul;10:98-108. doi: 10.15288/jsas.1985.s10.98.
Key aspects of the pharmacokinetics of alcohol are highly relevant to highway safety. Of particular pertinence are the partition of alcohol between various body tissues and fluids and the resulting alcohol concentration ratios for blood: breath and other body fluids, as well as the irregularity and short-term fluctuations of the blood and breath alcohol curves. Most alcohol pharmacokinetics parameters are subject to wide intersubject variability, as exemplified by peak blood alcohol concentrations reached on ingestion of identical weight-adjusted doses, time to peak after end of drinking and the rate of alcohol elimination from the blood. This great biological intersubject variability, when combined with sex-, age- and time-related differences, makes the blood alcohol information in widely distributed alcohol consumption nomograms and tables based on mean data inappropriate as a guide for the drinking behavior of individuals. Although there is good statistical correlation between the alcohol concentration of different body tissues and fluids in the fully postabsorptive state, wide individual variations from the population mean alcohol partition values exist. It is often impossible to determine whether the postabsorptive state has been reached at any given time. Those factors make it impossible or infeasible to convert the alcohol concentration of breath or urine to the simultaneous blood alcohol concentration with forensically acceptable certainty, especially under per se or absolute alcohol concentration laws. Inclusion of breath alcohol concentrations in drinking-driving statutes, as definitions or per se offense elements, makes unnecessary the conversion of breath alcohol analysis results into equivalent blood alcohol concentrations. Urine alcohol concentrations are inadequately correlated with blood alcohol concentrations or with driver impairment, and analysis of bladder urine is, therefore, inappropriate in traffic law enforcement. Significantly large sex-related differences in pharmacokinetic parameters have been demonstrated (e.g., in peak blood alcohol concentrations for weight-adjusted doses). The effects of age and time of day have been less extensively studies and are less clear. Breath and blood alcohol time curves are subject to short-term fluctuations from the trend line and other irregularities, and often do not follow the typical Widmark pattern. From the existing information on pharmacokinetics of alcohol and the characteristics and variability of blood and breath alcohol versus time curves, the following conclusions can be reached.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
酒精的药代动力学关键方面与公路安全高度相关。特别相关的是酒精在身体各个组织和体液之间的分配情况以及由此产生的血液与呼气及其他体液的酒精浓度比,还有血液和呼气酒精曲线的不规则性及短期波动。大多数酒精药代动力学参数在个体间存在很大差异,例如摄入相同体重调整剂量后达到的血中酒精峰值浓度、饮酒结束后达到峰值的时间以及酒精从血液中消除的速率。这种个体间巨大的生物学差异,再加上与性别、年龄和时间相关的差异,使得广泛传播的基于平均数据的酒精消费列线图和表格中的血液酒精信息不适用于指导个人饮酒行为。尽管在完全吸收后状态下不同身体组织和体液中的酒精浓度之间存在良好的统计相关性,但个体与总体平均酒精分配值存在很大差异。通常无法确定在任何给定时间是否已达到吸收后状态。这些因素使得无法或难以以法医可接受的确定性将呼气或尿液中的酒精浓度转换为同时期的血液酒精浓度,尤其是在本身或绝对酒精浓度法律规定下。将呼气酒精浓度纳入酒驾法规中,作为定义或本身违法要素,使得无需将呼气酒精分析结果转换为等效的血液酒精浓度。尿液酒精浓度与血液酒精浓度或驾驶员损伤之间的相关性不足,因此,在交通执法中分析膀胱尿液是不合适的。药代动力学参数中已证明存在显著的性别差异(例如,体重调整剂量的血中酒精峰值浓度)。年龄和一天中时间的影响研究较少且不太明确。呼气和血液酒精时间曲线会出现偏离趋势线的短期波动及其他不规则情况,且通常不遵循典型的维德马克模式。根据现有的酒精药代动力学信息以及血液和呼气酒精与时间曲线的特征和变异性,可以得出以下结论。(摘要截短至400字)