文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment.

作者信息

Soleimani Ghazaleh, Towhidkhah Farzad, Saviz Mehrdad, Ekhtiari Hamed

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Laureate Institute of Brain Research, Tulsa, United States of America.

出版信息

Basic Clin Neurosci. 2023 Sep-Oct;14(5):647-662. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2021.3400.1. Epub 2023 Sep 1.


DOI:10.32598/bcn.2021.3400.1
PMID:38628838
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11016884/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as an adjunctive treatment option for substance use disorders (SUDs). Alterations in brain structure following SUD may change tDCS-induced electric field (EF) and subsequent responses; however, group-level differences between healthy controls (HC) and participants with SUDs in terms of EF and its association with cortical architecture have not yet been modeled quantitatively. This study provides a methodology for group-level analysis of computational head models to investigate the influence of cortical morphology metrics on EFs. METHODS: Whole-brain surface-based morphology was conducted, and cortical thickness, volume, and surface area were compared between participants with cannabis use disorders (CUD) (n=20) and age-matched HC (n=22). Meanwhile, EFs were simulated for bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The effects of structural alterations on EF distribution were investigated based on individualized computational head models. RESULTS: Regarding EF, no significant difference was found within the prefrontal cortex; however, EFs were significantly different in left-postcentral and right-superior temporal gyrus (P<0.05) with higher levels of variance in CUD compared to HC [F=5.31, P<0.0001, C=0.95]. Significant differences were observed in cortical area (caudal anterior cingulate and rostral middle frontal), thickness (lateral orbitofrontal), and volume (paracentral and fusiform) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Brain morphology and tDCS-induced EFs may be changed following CUD; however, differences between CUD and HCs in EFs do not always overlap with brain areas that show structural alterations. To sufficiently modulate stimulation targets, whether individuals with CUD need different stimulation doses based on tDCS target location should be checked.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/320e919c1fa1/BCN-14-647-g003b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/0e5d2701c956/BCN-14-647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/a16b952f4153/BCN-14-647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/dfc62b23751b/BCN-14-647-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/320e919c1fa1/BCN-14-647-g003b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/0e5d2701c956/BCN-14-647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/a16b952f4153/BCN-14-647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/dfc62b23751b/BCN-14-647-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f3b/11016884/320e919c1fa1/BCN-14-647-g003b.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment.

Basic Clin Neurosci. 2023

[2]
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study.

J Affect Disord. 2018-2-28

[3]
Computational simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced electric fields in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of heavy cannabis using individuals.

Asian J Psychiatr. 2024-3

[4]
Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial.

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021-2

[5]
HD-tDCS induced changes in resting-state functional connectivity: Insights from EF modeling.

Brain Stimul. 2023

[6]
How do substance use disorders compare to other psychiatric conditions on structural brain abnormalities? A cross-disorder meta-analytic comparison using the ENIGMA consortium findings.

Hum Brain Mapp. 2022-1

[7]
Interaction of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (l-DLPFC) and Right Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC) in Hot and Cold Executive Functions: Evidence from Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

Neuroscience. 2017-11-4

[8]
Differences in electric field strength between clinical and non-clinical populations induced by prefrontal tDCS: A cross-diagnostic, individual MRI-based modeling study.

Neuroimage Clin. 2022

[9]
The efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation to prefrontal areas is related to underlying cortical morphology.

Neuroimage. 2019-4-9

[10]
Modulation of cortical responses by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A resting-state EEG and TMS-EEG study.

Brain Stimul. 2018-6-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
Four dimensions of individualization in brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: context, target, dose, and timing.

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025-5

[2]
Dose-response in modulating brain function with transcranial direct current stimulation: From local to network levels.

PLoS Comput Biol. 2023-10

[3]
Are we really targeting and stimulating DLPFC by placing transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) electrodes over F3/F4?

Hum Brain Mapp. 2023-12-1

[4]
DLPFC stimulation alters large-scale brain networks connectivity during a drug cue reactivity task: A tDCS-fMRI study.

Front Syst Neurosci. 2022-10-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Regionally specific gray matter volume is lower in alcohol use disorder: Implications for noninvasive brain stimulation treatment.

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021-8

[2]
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a potential treatment approach for cannabis use disorder.

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021-7-13

[3]
Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder.

Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021-2-25

[4]
Bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation attenuated symptoms of alcohol use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021-6-8

[5]
Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Brain Morphology: A Review of the Evidence.

Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021-6

[6]
A Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Substance and Food Craving: What Effect Do Modulators Have?

Front Psychiatry. 2020-6-26

[7]
Impaired motor cortical plasticity associated with cannabis use disorder in young adults.

Addict Biol. 2021-5

[8]
Association between tDCS computational modeling and clinical outcomes in depression: data from the ELECT-TDCS trial.

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021-2

[9]
Assessing the Role of Cannabis Use on Cortical Surface Structure in Adolescents and Young Adults: Exploring Gender and Aerobic Fitness as Potential Moderators.

Brain Sci. 2020-2-22

[10]
Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Stimulant Craving in Users of Cocaine, Amphetamine, or Methamphetamine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Front Neurosci. 2019-10-18

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索