• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Introducing dynamic consent for improved trust and privacy in research involving human biological material and associated data in South Africa.在南非,引入动态同意以提高涉及人类生物材料及相关数据的研究中的信任度和隐私保护。
Front Genet. 2024 Apr 3;15:1272924. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1272924. eCollection 2024.
2
"A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study.《信任的问题》和《信仰的飞跃》——智能家居研究中参与者对同意、隐私和信任的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 26;9(11):e25227. doi: 10.2196/25227.
3
Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives.将动态同意纳入纵向队列研究:关于EXCEED参与者观点的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00583-w.
4
Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.公众对生物样本库研究中的知情同意和数据共享的态度:美国一项大型多地点实验性调查
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar 2;100(3):414-427. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Biobank Participants' Attitudes Toward Data Sharing and Privacy: The Role of Trust in Reducing Perceived Risks.生物库参与者对数据共享和隐私的态度:信任在降低感知风险方面的作用。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):167-176. doi: 10.1177/15562646211055282. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
8
Is Consent Based on Trust Morally Inferior to Consent Based on Information?基于信任的同意在道德上是否低于基于信息的同意?
Bioethics. 2017 Jul;31(6):432-442. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12342. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from 'easy rescue', 'no harm' and 'consent bias' fail.为健康记录研究中的知情同意辩护——为何“轻松救援”“无伤害”及“同意偏差”的论点站不住脚。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 20;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00519-w.
10
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring ethical monitoring of physical activity behaviors among adults: a Smart Platform study operationalizing digital citizen science.探索成年人身体活动行为的伦理监测:一项实施数字公民科学的智能平台研究
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 18;13:e19793. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19793. eCollection 2025.
2
Perspectives of Research Ethics Committees on the Challenges of Human Genomic Research Participation in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚研究伦理委员会对人类基因组研究参与挑战的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Jul;20(3):162-174. doi: 10.1177/15562646251339221. Epub 2025 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Informed Consent, Understanding, and Trust.知情同意、理解与信任。
Am J Bioeth. 2021 May;21(5):61-63. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1906987.
2
Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far.关于生物医学研究中动态同意的思考:迄今为止的故事。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):649-656. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00771-z. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
3
Replacing Paper Informed Consent with Electronic Informed Consent for Research in Academic Medical Centers: A Scoping Review.在学术医疗中心用电子知情同意书取代纸质知情同意书用于研究:一项范围综述。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2020 May 30;2020:80-88. eCollection 2020.
4
Dynamic-informed consent: A potential solution for ethical dilemmas in population sequencing initiatives.动态知情同意:群体测序计划中伦理困境的潜在解决方案。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Apr 2;18:913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.027. eCollection 2020.
5
Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.动态同意:现代生物医学研究中一些挑战的潜在解决方案。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9.
6
Trust me, I'm a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.相信我,我是一名研究人员!:信任在生物医学研究中的作用。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Mar;20(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9721-6.
7
Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research.动态同意:一种可能的解决方案,可以提高患者对电子病历在医学研究中使用方式的信心和信任。
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Jan 13;3(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3525.
8
Redefining genomic privacy: trust and empowerment.重新定义基因组隐私:信任与赋权。
PLoS Biol. 2014 Nov 4;12(11):e1001983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001983. eCollection 2014 Nov.
9
Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.动态同意:21世纪研究网络的患者界面
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Feb;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71. Epub 2014 May 7.
10
Dynamic consent in the digital age of biology: online initiatives and regulatory considerations.生物学数字时代的动态同意:在线倡议与监管考量
J Prim Health Care. 2013 Dec 1;5(4):341-7.

在南非,引入动态同意以提高涉及人类生物材料及相关数据的研究中的信任度和隐私保护。

Introducing dynamic consent for improved trust and privacy in research involving human biological material and associated data in South Africa.

作者信息

Prinsen Larisse

机构信息

Department of Public Law, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2024 Apr 3;15:1272924. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1272924. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2024.1272924
PMID:38633409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11021646/
Abstract

Biomedical research using human biological material and data is essential for improving human health, but it requires the active participation of many human volunteers in addition to the distribution of data. As a result, it has raised numerous vexing questions related to trust, privacy and consent. Trust is essential in biomedical research as it relates directly to the willingness of participants to continue participating in research. Privacy and the protection of personal information also influence trust. Informed consent has proven to be insufficient as it cannot overcome the informational deficit between primary and unknown future uses of material and data and is therefore not fully informed and invalid. Broad consent is also problematic as it takes full control of samples and data flow from the research participant and inherently requires that a participant must trust that the researcher will use their material or data in a manner that they would find acceptable. This paper attempts to offer some insight into how these related issues can be overcome. It introduces dynamic consent as a consent model in research involving human biological material and its associated data. Dynamic consent is explained, as well as its claims of superiority in instances where future research is possible. It is also shown how dynamic consent contributes to better control of the samples and data by the research participant, and how trust may be improved by using this consent model. Dynamic consent's co-existence with and support of the South African Protection of Personal Information Act of 2013 is also assessed. The limitations of dynamic consent are also discussed.

摘要

使用人类生物材料和数据进行生物医学研究对于改善人类健康至关重要,但除了数据分发外,还需要许多人类志愿者的积极参与。因此,它引发了许多与信任、隐私和同意相关的棘手问题。信任在生物医学研究中至关重要,因为它直接关系到参与者继续参与研究的意愿。隐私和个人信息保护也会影响信任。事实证明,知情同意是不够的,因为它无法克服生物材料和数据最初使用与未来未知使用之间的信息差距,因此并非完全知情且无效。广泛同意也存在问题,因为它完全控制了研究参与者的样本和数据流,并且本质上要求参与者必须相信研究人员会以他们认为可接受的方式使用他们的材料或数据。本文试图对如何克服这些相关问题提供一些见解。它引入了动态同意作为涉及人类生物材料及其相关数据的研究中的一种同意模式。文中解释了动态同意及其在未来可能进行研究的情况下的优势主张。还展示了动态同意如何有助于研究参与者更好地控制样本和数据,以及使用这种同意模式如何可能改善信任。同时还评估了动态同意与2013年《南非个人信息保护法》的共存及对该法的支持情况。文中也讨论了动态同意的局限性。