Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, FINLAND.
Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, FINLAND.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Sep 1;56(9):1722-1731. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003458. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
The skill domains of fundamental movement skills (FMS), emphasizing gross motor movements, including locomotor skills (LMS) and object control skills (OCS), along with process- and product-oriented measures of FMS, may predict cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscular fitness (MF) differently. This study investigates the longitudinal relationship from early childhood FMS, focusing on process-oriented LMS and OCS and product-oriented FMS, to CRF and MF in late childhood.
The study involved 441 Finnish children (49.9% female; mean age at baseline, 5.5 yr) over a 6-yr period. FMS was evaluated using the Test of Gross Motor Development, third version, for process-oriented LMS and OCS, and the Körperkoordinationstest Für Kinder (KTK) was used to evaluate the product-oriented FMS. CRF was assessed through the total number of laps completed in the 20-m shuttle run test, whereas MF was measured via repetitions of curl-ups and push-ups. Employing a two-level cross-classified regression analysis and Cholesky decomposition, this study aimed to determine the contributions of product-oriented KTK and process-oriented LMS and OCS. Adjustments for variations in age, measurement intervals, and maturation were achieved through residualization. In addition, gender and body mass index were incorporated as covariates in the analysis.
The analysis revealed that process-oriented LMS (CRF: Δ R2 = 0.016; MF: Δ R2 = 0.014) significantly predicted later health-related fitness, whereas OCS did not. However, KTK exhibited a better ability to predict both CRF (Δ R2 = 0.092) and MF (Δ R2 = 0.032), overshadowing process-oriented measures.
In conclusion, the findings suggest that KTK, which potentially encompasses a broader spectrum of fitness elements along with FMS, more effectively predicts health-related fitness components than process-oriented FMS.
基本运动技能(FMS)的技能领域强调粗大运动,包括移动技能(LMS)和物体控制技能(OCS),以及 FMS 的面向过程和产品的测量方法,可能会以不同的方式预测心肺健康(CRF)和肌肉健康(MF)。本研究调查了从儿童早期 FMS 到儿童后期 CRF 和 MF 的纵向关系,重点是面向过程的 LMS 和 OCS 以及面向产品的 FMS。
这项研究涉及了 441 名芬兰儿童(49.9%为女性;基线时的平均年龄为 5.5 岁),为期 6 年。使用运动发育测试第三版评估 FMS,用于评估面向过程的 LMS 和 OCS,使用儿童身体协调测试(KTK)评估面向产品的 FMS。CRF 通过 20 米往返跑测试中完成的总圈数来评估,而 MF 通过仰卧起坐和俯卧撑的次数来衡量。本研究采用两水平交叉分类回归分析和 Cholesky 分解,旨在确定面向产品的 KTK 和面向过程的 LMS 和 OCS 的贡献。通过残差化实现了对年龄、测量间隔和成熟度变化的调整。此外,性别和体重指数被纳入分析作为协变量。
分析表明,面向过程的 LMS(CRF:Δ R2 = 0.016;MF:Δ R2 = 0.014)显著预测了以后的健康相关的体能,而 OCS 则没有。然而,KTK 更好地预测了 CRF(Δ R2 = 0.092)和 MF(Δ R2 = 0.032),优于面向过程的测量方法。
总之,研究结果表明,KTK 可能包含了更广泛的与 FMS 相关的体能元素,比面向过程的 FMS 更有效地预测健康相关的体能成分。