• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生保健专业人员停止使用抗抑郁药的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和主题综合分析。

Health care professional barriers and facilitators to discontinuing antidepressant use: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium.

Primary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Health & Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2024 Jul 1;356:616-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.060. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.060
PMID:38640978
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Long-term antidepressant (AD) use, much longer than recommended, is very common and can lead to potential harms.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the existing literature on perspectives of health professionals (HPs) regarding long-term AD treatment, focusing on barriers and facilitators to discontinuation.

METHODS

A systematic review with thematic synthesis. Eight electronic databases were searched until August 2023 including MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED, Health Management Information Consortium, and the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertation.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the review. Of these, nine focused on general practitioner perspectives, one on psychiatrist perspectives, and three on a mix of HPs perspectives. Barriers and facilitators to discontinuing long-term ADs emerged within eight themes, ordered chronologically based on HP considerations during an AD review: perception of AD use, fears, HP role and responsibility, HPs' perception of AD discontinuation, HPs' confidence regarding their ability to manage discontinuation, perceived patient readiness to stop, support from patient's trusted people, and support from other HPs.

LIMITATIONS

Coding and development of subthemes and themes was performed by one researcher and further developed through discussion within the research team.

CONCLUSION

Deprescribing long-term ADs is a challenging concept for HPs. The review found evidence that the barriers far outweigh the facilitators with fear of relapse as a main barrier. HP education, reassurance and confidence-building is essential to increase the initiation of the discontinuation process. Further research into the perspectives of pharmacists and mental health workers is needed as well as exploring the role of trusted people.

摘要

简介

长期使用抗抑郁药(AD),比推荐的时间长得多,是非常常见的,可能会导致潜在的危害。

目的

调查健康专业人员(HPs)对长期 AD 治疗的看法,重点是停药的障碍和促进因素。

方法

系统综述与主题综合。直到 2023 年 8 月,我们在 8 个电子数据库中进行了搜索,包括 MEDLINE、PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、AMED、Health Management Information Consortium 和 Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertation。

结果

综述共纳入 13 项研究。其中,9 项研究侧重于全科医生的观点,1 项研究侧重于精神科医生的观点,3 项研究侧重于混合 HPs 观点。在 8 个主题中出现了停止长期 AD 的障碍和促进因素,根据 HP 在 AD 审查期间的考虑,按照时间顺序排列:AD 使用的看法、恐惧、HP 角色和责任、HP 对 AD 停药的看法、HP 对其停药能力的信心、感知到患者准备停止、患者信任的人的支持、以及其他 HPs 的支持。

局限性

一个研究人员进行了编码和子主题和主题的开发,并通过研究团队内部的讨论进一步开发。

结论

为 HPs 停止长期使用 AD 是一个具有挑战性的概念。该综述发现,证据表明障碍远远超过促进因素,复发的恐惧是一个主要障碍。对 HP 进行教育、提供保证和建立信心对于启动停药过程至关重要。还需要进一步研究药剂师和心理健康工作者的观点,并探索值得信赖的人的作用。

相似文献

1
Health care professional barriers and facilitators to discontinuing antidepressant use: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.卫生保健专业人员停止使用抗抑郁药的障碍和促进因素:系统评价和主题综合分析。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jul 1;356:616-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.060. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
2
Pharmacists' views on discontinuing long-term use of antidepressants and supporting patients during the discontinuation process: a qualitative study.药剂师对停止长期使用抗抑郁药和在停药过程中支持患者的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 20;74(suppl 1):bjgp24X737781. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X737781.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
7
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
8
Withdrawal versus continuation of chronic antipsychotic drugs for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia.痴呆症老年人行为和心理症状的慢性抗精神病药物撤药与继续用药对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD007726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007726.pub2.
9
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to antidepressant deprescribing - A qualitative interview study with general practitioners in Germany.抗抑郁药减药的障碍与促进因素——一项对德国全科医生的定性访谈研究
Eur J Gen Pract. 2025 Dec;31(1):2531879. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2531879. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
2
Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Antidepressant Discontinuation: A Focus Group Study.医疗服务提供者对抗抑郁药停药的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Jun;137(1):e70051. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.70051.
3
The missing link? Pharmacists' perspectives on discontinuation of long-term antidepressants: a qualitative study.
缺失的环节?药剂师对停用长期抗抑郁药的看法:一项定性研究。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2025 Apr 27;15:20451253251333977. doi: 10.1177/20451253251333977. eCollection 2025.