Suppr超能文献

阶段 2.0:完善跨诊断临床分期框架,以提高青少年心理健康的可靠性和实用性。

Staging 2.0: refining transdiagnostic clinical staging frameworks to enhance reliability and utility for youth mental health.

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;11(6):461-471. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00060-9. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

Abstract

Globally, 75% of depressive, bipolar, and psychotic disorders emerge by age 25 years. However, these disorders are often preceded by non-specific symptoms or attenuated clinical syndromes. Difficulties in determining optimal treatment interventions for these emerging mental disorders, and uncertainties about accounting for co-occurring psychopathology and illness trajectories, have led many youth mental health services to adopt transdiagnostic clinical staging frameworks. In this Health Policy paper, an international working group highlights ongoing challenges in applying transdiagnostic staging frameworks in clinical research and practice, and proposes refinements to the transdiagnostic model to enhance its reliability, consistent recording, and clinical utility. We introduce the concept of within-stage heterogeneity and describe the advantages of defining stage in terms of clinical psychopathology and stage modifiers. Using examples from medicine, we discuss the utility of categorising stage modifiers into factors associated with progression (ie, potential predictors of stage transition) and extension (ie, factors associated with the current presentation that add complexity to treatment selection). Lastly, we suggest how it is possible to revise the currently used transdiagnostic staging approach to incorporate these key concepts, and how the revised framework could be applied in clinical and research practice.

摘要

全球范围内,75%的抑郁、双相情感和精神分裂症等障碍在 25 岁之前出现。然而,这些疾病通常之前会有非特异性症状或不明显的临床综合征。对于这些新兴精神障碍,确定最佳治疗干预措施存在困难,并且对于共病精神病理学和疾病轨迹的解释存在不确定性,这导致许多青年心理健康服务机构采用了跨诊断临床分期框架。在这篇卫生政策文件中,一个国际工作组强调了在临床研究和实践中应用跨诊断分期框架所面临的持续挑战,并提出了对跨诊断模型的改进,以增强其可靠性、一致记录和临床实用性。我们引入了阶段内异质性的概念,并描述了根据临床精神病理学和阶段修饰符来定义阶段的优势。我们使用医学中的例子讨论了将阶段修饰符分类为与进展相关的因素(即阶段转换的潜在预测因素)和扩展因素(即与当前表现相关的因素,增加了治疗选择的复杂性)的效用。最后,我们建议如何修改当前使用的跨诊断分期方法以纳入这些关键概念,以及如何在临床和研究实践中应用修订后的框架。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验