Arslantürk Eren Mehtap, Nalcı Baytaroğlu Hilal, Atilla Huban
Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Trabzon, Türkiye.
University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Türkiye.
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 19;54(2):56-62. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.93607.
Determining the accuracy of cycloplegic refractive error measurements made with the Spot Vision Screener (SVS, Welch Allyn Inc, Skaneateles Falls, NY, USA) is important for refractive assessment of uncooperative patients during optometric examinations. This study compared cycloplegic refractive errors measured by SVS and tabletop autorefractometer to cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.
Eighty-eight eyes of 44 subjects were examined in the study. Refractive error measurements were obtained under cycloplegia using retinoscopy, SVS, and Nidek ARK-530 tabletop autorefractometer (ARK-530, Nidek, Japan). Spherical and cylindrical values, spherical equivalents (SE), and Jackson cross-cylinder values at axes of 0° (J0) and 45° (J45) were recorded. Correlations between methods were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.
The mean age was 7 years (range: 6 months-17 years). Sixteen (36%) of the subjects were female and 28 (64%) were male. For SE there was excellent agreement between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.924) and between retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.995). While there was a moderate correlation between retinoscopy and SVS for cylindrical values (ICC: 0.686), excellent correlation was detected between retinoscopy and autorefractometer (ICC: 0.966). J0 and J45 crosscylinder power values were not correlated between retinoscopy and SVS (ICC: 0.472) or retinoscopy and tabletop autorefractometer (ICC: 0.442). Retinoscopy was correlated with both SVS and tabletop autorefractometer for all parameters within ±1.96 standard deviations in Bland-Altman analysis.
Cycloplegic retinoscopy is the gold standard for refractive error measurement in the pediatric population. However, it requires time and experienced professionals. This study revealed moderate to good agreement between SVS and retinoscopy, with better agreement in spherical errors than cylindrical errors. Although the SVS is intended for screening programs, it may also be useful in the pediatric eye office to estimate spherical refractive error in uncooperative patients.
确定使用Spot视力筛查仪(SVS,美国纽约州斯卡奈特勒斯福尔斯韦尔奇·阿林公司)进行的睫状肌麻痹验光测量的准确性,对于验光检查期间不合作患者的屈光评估很重要。本研究比较了儿童中SVS和台式自动验光仪测量的睫状肌麻痹屈光不正与睫状肌麻痹检影验光结果。
本研究检查了44名受试者的88只眼。在睫状肌麻痹下使用检影验光、SVS和尼德克ARK-530台式自动验光仪(ARK-530,日本尼德克)获得屈光不正测量值。记录球镜和柱镜值、球镜等效值(SE)以及0°轴(J0)和45°轴(J45)的杰克逊交叉柱镜值。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和布兰德-奥特曼分析来分析各方法之间的相关性。
平均年龄为7岁(范围:6个月至17岁)。16名(36%)受试者为女性,28名(64%)为男性。对于SE,检影验光与SVS之间(ICC:0.924)以及检影验光与台式自动验光仪之间(ICC:0.995)存在极好的一致性。虽然检影验光与SVS在柱镜值方面存在中度相关性(ICC:0.686),但检影验光与自动验光仪之间存在极好的相关性(ICC:0.966)。J0和J45交叉柱镜屈光力值在检影验光与SVS之间(ICC:0.472)或检影验光与台式自动验光仪之间(ICC:0.442)无相关性。在布兰德-奥特曼分析中,检影验光与SVS和台式自动验光仪在所有参数上的相关性均在±1.96标准差范围内。
睫状肌麻痹检影验光是儿童屈光不正测量的金标准。然而,它需要时间和经验丰富的专业人员。本研究显示SVS与检影验光之间存在中度至良好的一致性,球镜误差的一致性优于柱镜误差。虽然SVS旨在用于筛查项目,但它在儿科眼科诊所中对于估计不合作患者的球镜屈光不正可能也有用。