• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《Spot 视力筛查仪在检测 6 个月至 36 个月龄儿童视力障碍中的有效性》。

Validity of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting vision disorders in children 6 months to 36 months of age.

机构信息

New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts.

New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J AAPOS. 2019 Oct;23(5):278.e1-278.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.06.008
PMID:31521849
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the Spot Vision Screener in detecting targeted vision disorders compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy in children <3 years of age.

METHODS

Children, ages 6 months to 36 months underwent vision screening using the Spot Vision Screener. Results were compared to results of comprehensive eye examinations. Validity of the Spot was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC); the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to determine optimal sensitivity and specificity for detection of targeted vision disorders.

RESULTS

A total of 249 children were included. The AUC for detecting targeted vision disorders as defined by the study specific criteria using the Spot was 0.790. Compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy, the Spot underestimated hyperopia by 1.02 D (95% CI, 0.86-1.17 D). For hyperopia ≥4.5 D spherical equivalent (n = 10), the mean difference between the Spot and cycloplegic retinoscopy was 3.46 D (95% CI, 1.95-4.98 D). In contrast, the Spot overestimated astigmatism compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy (-1.00 D vs -0.48 D; P < 0.001) by -0.52 D (95% CI, 0.43-0.62 D).

CONCLUSIONS

The Spot Vision Screener showed good overall validity in detecting targeted vision disorders. It was within 0.5 D and 1 D of cycloplegic retinoscopy with regard to low hyperopia and astigmatism. Higher hyperopic spherical equivalent refractive errors showed larger differences in mean values between the Spot and cycloplegic retinoscopy.

摘要

目的

评估 Spot 视力筛查仪在检测 <3 岁儿童目标视力障碍方面的表现,与睫状肌麻痹验光相比。

方法

6 个月至 36 个月大的儿童接受 Spot 视力筛查仪进行视力筛查。结果与全面眼科检查结果进行比较。通过计算曲线下面积(AUC)来评估 Spot 的有效性;使用接收者操作特征(ROC)确定检测目标视力障碍的最佳敏感性和特异性。

结果

共纳入 249 名儿童。使用 Spot 按照研究特定标准检测目标视力障碍的 AUC 为 0.790。与睫状肌麻痹验光相比,Spot 低估远视 1.02 D(95%置信区间,0.86-1.17 D)。对于等效球镜远视≥4.5 D(n=10),Spot 与睫状肌麻痹验光之间的平均差异为 3.46 D(95%置信区间,1.95-4.98 D)。相比之下,Spot 高估了散光,与睫状肌麻痹验光相比,差值为-1.00 D(95%置信区间,-0.48 D 至-0.48 D)。

结论

Spot 视力筛查仪在检测目标视力障碍方面具有良好的总体有效性。在低度远视和散光方面,它与睫状肌麻痹验光的差值在 0.5 D 和 1 D 以内。较高的远视等效球镜屈光不正显示 Spot 与睫状肌麻痹验光之间的平均值差异较大。

相似文献

1
Validity of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting vision disorders in children 6 months to 36 months of age.《Spot 视力筛查仪在检测 6 个月至 36 个月龄儿童视力障碍中的有效性》。
J AAPOS. 2019 Oct;23(5):278.e1-278.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
Detection of Amblyogenic Refractive Error Using the Spot Vision Screener in Children.使用斑点视力筛查仪检测儿童致弱视屈光不正。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 May;97(5):324-331. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001505.
3
Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.儿童屈光不正筛查:由非专业筛查人员使用plusoptiX S08和Retinomax K-plus2与睫状肌麻痹验光法进行比较。
J AAPOS. 2010 Dec;14(6):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.09.015.
4
Spot Refractive Screening With or Without Maximum Atropine Cycloplegia in Preschool Chinese Children.学龄前中国儿童的点瞳折射筛查(伴或不伴最大阿托品睫状肌麻痹)。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2021 May-Jun;58(3):146-153. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20210128-01. Epub 2021 May 1.
5
Accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy, retinomax autorefractor, and SureSight vision screener for detecting significant refractive errors.非睫状肌麻痹检影、Retinomax 自动折射仪和 SureSight 视力筛查仪检测显著屈光不正的准确性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Mar 6;55(3):1378-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13433.
6
Accuracy of the Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners for detection of astigmatism.Spot和Plusoptix电脑验光仪检测散光的准确性。
J AAPOS. 2015 Oct;19(5):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.07.284.
7
Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener for children with limited access to ocular health care.针对获得眼部保健服务机会有限的儿童的Spot视力筛查仪评估。
J AAPOS. 2019 Jun;23(3):153.e1-153.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.09.012. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
8
Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error.新的独立暗室折射筛查仪与台式自动折射仪和睫状肌麻痹检影验光在检测屈光不正方面的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 27;23(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03231-6.
9
Detection of significant vision conditions in children using QuickSee wavefront autorefractor.使用 QuickSee 波前自动验光仪检测儿童的重要视力状况。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 May;44(3):501-513. doi: 10.1111/opo.13301. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
10
Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children.儿科眼科诊室中的电脑验光仪:高危儿童的可测试性及验光结果对比
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;158(5):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.041. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Combination of 2 test methods, single-picture optotype visual acuity chart and spot™ vision screener, in the eye health screening program for 3-year-old children in Tokyo: A retrospective, observational study.在东京的 3 岁儿童眼健康筛查计划中,联合使用单张视力表和 spot™视力筛查仪两种检测方法:一项回顾性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38488. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038488.
2
The Performance of Spot Photoscreener in 6 to 10 Weeks Infants in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国6至10周龄婴儿中Spot照片筛查仪的性能:一项横断面研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 11;2024:8817530. doi: 10.1155/2024/8817530. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.
小儿群体中Spot视力筛查仪和桌面式自动验光仪与视网膜检影法的比较
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 19;54(2):56-62. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.93607.
4
Effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener using updated 2021 AAPOS guidelines.使用 2021 年 AAPOS 更新指南评估斑点视力筛查仪的效果。
J AAPOS. 2023 Feb;27(1):24.e1-24.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.11.019. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Photorefraction with Spot Vision Screener versus Visual Acuity Testing as Community-Based Preschool Vision Screening at the Age of 3.5 Years in Japan.日本社区在 3.5 岁时使用点状视力筛查仪进行光折射与视力测试作为学龄前儿童视力筛查的对比研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 16;19(14):8655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148655.
6
Clinical correlation between automated vision screening under cycloplegia and retinoscopy in young children.在睫状肌麻痹下的自动视力筛查与幼儿检影验光的临床相关性。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2023 May-Jun;86(3):232-239. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20230030.
7
2020 Evaluation of Portable Vision Screening Instruments.2020 年便携式视力筛查仪器评估。
Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Mar 31;94(1):107-114. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Comparison of Outcomes of Vision and Eye Screening of Children of Four Orphanages and School Children of Riyadh.比较利雅得四所孤儿院儿童和学龄儿童的视力和眼部筛查结果。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 30;27(3):172-176. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_241_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.