Suppr超能文献

早期补充二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)对神经发育有益吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Could early life DHA supplementation benefit neurodevelopment? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hu Ruolan, Xu Juan, Hua Yimin, Li Yifei, Li Jinrong

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of MOE, Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 5;15:1295788. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1295788. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) plays a crucial role in the growth and functional development of the infant brain. However, the impact of additional DHA supplementation on neurodevelopment in infants remains controversial in randomized controlled trials. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the effects of prenatal and postnatal DHA supplementation on neurodevelopment.

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases using a predefined strategy until 8 February 2024. We extracted relevant study characteristics and outcomes related to the nervous system. Two independent reviewers critically evaluated the included studies to assess their validity and risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies met our inclusion criteria, one study was removed after quality assessment, and the meta-analysis included 9 randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between the DHA supplementation group and the placebo group, as assessed by the Mental Development Index [MDI; mean difference (MD), 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.91 to 1.73; = 0.55]. However, the DHA group had a significantly higher Psychomotor Development Index (PDI) than the placebo group (MD, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.23 to 2.72; = 0.02). Subgroup analyses based on populations showed that DHA supplementation was superior to placebo for infants in both MDI (language score conversion; MD, 2.05; 95% CI, -0.16 to 4.26; = 0.07) and PDI (MD, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.23 to 3.65; = 0.03). Other subgroup analyses indicated no statistical differences between the two groups. The remaining assessments that could not be summarized quantitatively underwent a narrative evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Based on the BSID assessments, DHA supplementation in infants may have potential neurodevelopmental benefits. Because the meta-analysis included few high-quality articles and had some limitations, more relevant articles are needed to address the need for separate DHA supplementation in infants, pregnant women, and lactating mothers.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022348100, identifier: CRD42022348100.

摘要

背景

二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)在婴儿大脑的生长和功能发育中起着至关重要的作用。然而,在随机对照试验中,额外补充DHA对婴儿神经发育的影响仍存在争议。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们旨在研究产前和产后补充DHA对神经发育的影响。

方法

我们使用预定义的策略,系统检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库,检索截至2024年2月8日。我们提取了与神经系统相关的研究特征和结果。两名独立的评审员对纳入的研究进行了严格评估,以评估其有效性和偏倚风险。

结果

共有21项研究符合我们的纳入标准,一项研究在质量评估后被排除,荟萃分析纳入了9项随机对照试验。荟萃分析结果表明,根据智力发育指数评估,补充DHA组和安慰剂组之间没有统计学上的显著差异[MDI;平均差(MD),0.41;95%置信区间(CI),-0.91至1.73;P = 0.55]。然而,DHA组的心理运动发育指数(PDI)显著高于安慰剂组(MD,1.47;95%CI,0.23至2.72;P = 0.02)。基于人群的亚组分析表明,补充DHA在MDI(语言分数转换;MD,2.05;95%CI,-0.16至4.26;P = 0.07)和PDI(MD,1.94;95%CI,0.23至3.65;P = 0.03)方面均优于安慰剂组。其他亚组分析表明两组之间没有统计学差异。其余无法进行定量汇总的评估进行了叙述性评价。

结论

基于贝利婴幼儿发育量表评估,婴儿补充DHA可能具有潜在的神经发育益处。由于荟萃分析纳入的高质量文章较少且存在一些局限性,因此需要更多相关文章来解决婴儿、孕妇和哺乳期母亲单独补充DHA的必要性问题。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022348100,标识符:CRD42022348100。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00d/11032049/014e47f1c90f/fneur-15-1295788-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验