School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).
World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Apr 22;10:e50958. doi: 10.2196/50958.
Vaccine hesitancy is complex and multifaced. People may accept or reject a vaccine due to multiple and interconnected reasons, with some reasons being more salient in influencing vaccine acceptance or resistance and hence the most important intervention targets for addressing vaccine hesitancy.
This study was aimed at assessing the connections and relative importance of motivators and demotivators for COVID-19 vaccination in Hong Kong based on co-occurrence networks of verbal reasons for vaccination acceptance and resistance from repetitive cross-sectional surveys.
We conducted a series of random digit dialing telephone surveys to examine COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among general Hong Kong adults between March 2021 and July 2022. A total of 5559 and 982 participants provided verbal reasons for accepting and resisting (rejecting or hesitating) a COVID-19 vaccine, respectively. The verbal reasons were initially coded to generate categories of motivators and demotivators for COVID-19 vaccination using a bottom-up approach. Then, all the generated codes were mapped onto the 5C model of vaccine hesitancy. On the basis of the identified reasons, we conducted a co-occurrence network analysis to understand how motivating or demotivating reasons were comentioned to shape people's vaccination decisions. Each reason's eigenvector centrality was calculated to quantify their relative importance in the network. Analyses were also stratified by age group.
The co-occurrence network analysis found that the perception of personal risk to the disease (egicentrality=0.80) and the social responsibility to protect others (egicentrality=0.58) were the most important comentioned reasons that motivate COVID-19 vaccination, while lack of vaccine confidence (egicentrality=0.89) and complacency (perceived low disease risk and low importance of vaccination; egicentrality=0.45) were the most important comentioned reasons that demotivate COVID-19 vaccination. For older people aged ≥65 years, protecting others was a more important motivator (egicentrality=0.57), while the concern about poor health status was a more important demotivator (egicentrality=0.42); for young people aged 18 to 24 years, recovering life normalcy (egicentrality=0.20) and vaccine mandates (egicentrality=0.26) were the more important motivators, while complacency (egicentrality=0.77) was a more important demotivator for COVID-19 vaccination uptake.
When disease risk is perceived to be high, promoting social responsibility to protect others is more important for boosting vaccination acceptance. However, when disease risk is perceived to be low and complacency exists, fostering confidence in vaccines to address vaccine hesitancy becomes more important. Interventions for promoting vaccination acceptance and reducing vaccine hesitancy should be tailored by age.
疫苗犹豫是复杂和多方面的。人们可能会因为多种相互关联的原因而接受或拒绝疫苗,其中一些原因在影响疫苗接种的接受或抵制方面更为突出,因此是解决疫苗犹豫的最重要干预目标。
本研究旨在基于接受和抵制 COVID-19 疫苗的口头原因的共现网络,评估香港 COVID-19 疫苗接种的动机因素和阻碍因素的联系和相对重要性。
我们在 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 7 月期间进行了一系列随机数字拨号电话调查,以检查香港普通成年人对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫情绪。共有 5559 名和 982 名参与者分别提供了接受和抵制(拒绝或犹豫)COVID-19 疫苗的口头原因。最初使用自下而上的方法将口头原因编码为 COVID-19 疫苗接种的动机因素和阻碍因素类别。然后,将所有生成的代码映射到疫苗犹豫的 5C 模型上。基于确定的原因,我们进行了共现网络分析,以了解激励或阻碍的原因如何共同影响人们的疫苗接种决策。计算每个原因的特征向量中心性,以量化它们在网络中的相对重要性。还按年龄组进行了分层分析。
共现网络分析发现,对疾病个人风险的感知(特征向量中心性=0.80)和保护他人的社会责任(特征向量中心性=0.58)是促进 COVID-19 疫苗接种的最重要的共同提及原因,而对疫苗缺乏信心(特征向量中心性=0.89)和自满(感知疾病风险低和疫苗接种重要性低;特征向量中心性=0.45)是阻碍 COVID-19 疫苗接种的最重要的共同提及原因。对于年龄在 65 岁及以上的老年人,保护他人是一个更重要的动机(特征向量中心性=0.57),而对健康状况不佳的担忧是一个更重要的阻碍因素(特征向量中心性=0.42);对于 18 至 24 岁的年轻人,恢复正常生活(特征向量中心性=0.20)和疫苗接种强制令(特征向量中心性=0.26)是更重要的动机,而自满(特征向量中心性=0.77)是更重要的阻碍 COVID-19 疫苗接种的因素。
当疾病风险被认为很高时,促进保护他人的社会责任对于提高疫苗接种的接受度更为重要。然而,当疾病风险被认为较低且存在自满情绪时,培养对疫苗的信心以解决疫苗犹豫问题变得更为重要。促进疫苗接种接受和减少疫苗犹豫的干预措施应根据年龄进行调整。