• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用医疗委员会来监管错误信息存在问题。

The Problem with Using Medical Boards to Regulate Misinformation.

出版信息

J Leg Med. 2023 Jan-Jun;43(1-2):3-18. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2024.2338057. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1080/01947648.2024.2338057
PMID:38648552
Abstract

Some stakeholders called on medical boards to sanction physicians for spreading misinformation during COVID-19 and discussing off-label medications. In 2022, California passed AB 2098, which classifies physician dissemination of misinformation as unprofessional conduct subject to discipline by the state medical board. This article describes the purpose and function of state medical boards, the law relating to off-label prescribing, and why using medical boards to discipline physicians for discussing controversial opinions exceeds the traditional role of state medical boards. Though physicians do have a duty to provide accurate information to the public, defining misinformation is difficult and poses five distinct problems. Although California's law was repealed, this article asserts that disciplining physicians for disseminating misinformation could pose Constitutional concerns, hinder physicians' ability to practice medicine, or suppress information that is important to the public interest.

摘要

一些利益相关者呼吁医疗委员会对在 COVID-19 期间传播错误信息和讨论未经批准的药物的医生进行制裁。2022 年,加利福尼亚州通过了 AB 2098,该法案将医生传播错误信息归类为不专业行为,可由州医疗委员会进行纪律处分。本文描述了州医疗委员会的目的和职能、与标签外处方相关的法律,以及为什么使用医疗委员会来惩戒因讨论有争议的观点而违反职业道德的医生超出了州医疗委员会的传统角色。尽管医生有向公众提供准确信息的责任,但定义错误信息是困难的,并且存在五个明显的问题。尽管加利福尼亚州的法律已被废除,但本文认为,因传播错误信息而惩戒医生可能会引发宪法问题,妨碍医生行医的能力,或压制对公众利益重要的信息。

相似文献

1
The Problem with Using Medical Boards to Regulate Misinformation.用医疗委员会来监管错误信息存在问题。
J Leg Med. 2023 Jan-Jun;43(1-2):3-18. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2024.2338057. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
3
Protecting the public: state medical board licensure policies for active and inactive physicians.保护公众:针对在职和非在职医生的州医学委员会执照政策
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):643-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1017.
4
Communication of COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media by Physicians in the US.社交媒体上美国医生传播的 COVID-19 错误信息。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28928.
5
Medical licensing board characteristics and physician discipline: an empirical analysis.医疗执照管理局特征与医师纪律:一项实证分析。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010 Feb;35(1):63-93. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2009-041.
6
Pain management, controlled substances, and state medical board policy: a decade of change.疼痛管理、管制药品与州医学委员会政策:十年变迁
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Feb;23(2):138-47. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00403-1.
7
State Medical Boards, Licensure, and Discipline in the United States.美国的州医学委员会、执照颁发与纪律处分
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2019 Oct;17(4):337-342. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190020. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Characteristics associated with physician discipline: a case-control study.与医师纪律处分相关的特征:一项病例对照研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 22;164(6):653-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.6.653.
9
Physicians disciplined by a state medical board.受到州医学委员会纪律处分的医生。
JAMA. 1998 Jun 17;279(23):1889-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.23.1889.
10
Governmental actions to address COVID-19 misinformation.应对新冠病毒错误信息的政府措施。
J Public Health Policy. 2021 Jun;42(2):201-210. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00270-x. Epub 2021 Jan 28.