Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织与各国 COVID-19 治疗指南比较:并非完全匹配。

Comparison of WHO versus national COVID-19 therapeutic guidelines across the world: not exactly a perfect match.

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Apr 22;9(4):e014188. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014188.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic affected all WHO member states. We compared and contrasted the COVID-19 treatment guidelines of each member state with the WHO COVID-19 therapeutic guidelines.

METHODS

Ministries of Health or accessed National Infectious Disease websites and other relevant bodies and experts were contacted to obtain national guidelines (NGs) for COVID-19 treatment. NGs were included only if they delineated specific pharmacological treatments for COVID-19, which were stratified by disease severity. We conducted a retrospective review using the adapted Reporting Checklist for Public Versions of Guidelines (RIGHT-PVG) survey checklist and a derived comparative metric based on the WHO guidelines was performed.

RESULTS

COVID-19 therapeutics NGs could be obtained from 109 of the 194 WHO member states. There was considerable variation in guidelines and in disease severity stratifications. Therapeutic recommendations in many NGs differed substantially from the WHO guidelines. Overall in late 2022, 93% of NGs were recommending at least one treatment which had proved to be ineffective in large randomised trials, and was not recommended by WHO. Corticosteroids were not recommended in severe disease in nearly 10% of NGs despite overwhelming evidence of their benefit. NGs from countries with low-resource settings showed the greatest divergence when stratified by gross domestic product per year, Human Development Index and the Global Health Security Index.

DISCUSSION

Our study is limited to NGs that were readily accessible, and it does not reflect the availability of recommended medicines in the field. Three years after the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, available COVID-19 NGs vary substantially in their therapeutic recommendations, often differ from the WHO guidelines, and commonly recommend ineffective, unaffordable or unavailable medicines.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行影响了所有世界卫生组织成员国。我们比较和对比了每个成员国的 COVID-19 治疗指南与世界卫生组织 COVID-19 治疗指南。

方法

联系了卫生部或访问了国家传染病网站和其他相关机构和专家,以获取 COVID-19 治疗的国家指南 (NGs)。只有当它们详细规定了 COVID-19 的具体药物治疗方法,并按疾病严重程度分层时,才会纳入 NGs。我们使用改编后的公共版本指南报告清单 (RIGHT-PVG) 调查清单进行了回顾性审查,并根据世界卫生组织指南制定了衍生的比较指标。

结果

可以从 194 个世界卫生组织成员国中的 109 个获得 COVID-19 治疗药物 NGs。指南和疾病严重程度分层存在很大差异。许多 NGs 的治疗建议与世界卫生组织指南有很大不同。总体而言,在 2022 年底,93%的 NGs 至少推荐了一种已被大型随机试验证明无效且世界卫生组织不推荐的治疗方法。尽管有大量证据表明皮质类固醇对严重疾病有益,但近 10%的 NGs 不建议在严重疾病中使用皮质类固醇。按每年国内生产总值、人类发展指数和全球卫生安全指数分层,来自资源较少国家的 NGs 差异最大。

讨论

我们的研究仅限于易于获得的 NGs,它不能反映现场推荐药物的可及性。在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行开始三年后,现有的 COVID-19 NGs 在其治疗建议方面存在很大差异,通常与世界卫生组织指南不同,并且通常推荐无效、负担不起或无法获得的药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a7/11043689/f38726909812/bmjgh-2023-014188f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验